ROME—When Pope Francis stepped out onto the central loggia of St. Peter’s on the night of March 13, I thought of the man I had met in his Buenos Aires office ten months before: Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio, S.J., who was looking forward to laying down the burden of leadership and devoting himself to prayer, reflection and study.
Now, because Benedict XVI decided to renounce the Chair of Peter and do what Cardinal Bergoglio wanted to do, the old-school Argentine Jesuit is now Benedict’s successor. His acceptance of the cross that is the papacy was an act of humble obedience by a man who had bent his will to the divine will for over a half-century.
What kind of man is he? Some impressions from an hour’s conversation last May:
A man of God.The new pope struck me then as someone who lived from the inside out: a man whose rich interior life was the basis of his public life; a leader whose decisions grew from prayer and discernment, not calculation.
A man of profound humility. I had long been interested in getting to know then-Cardinal Bergoglio, but I had the hardest time getting him to talk about his own life and experiences. I didn’t detect shyness in this, or false modesty, but a true evangelical humility. Pope Francis will not have the effervescence of a John Paul II; but like the Polish pope who created him cardinal, Jorge Bergoglio has spent his life saying, not “Look at me,” but rather, “Look to Jesus Christ.”
A man of keen and realistic intelligence. Pope Francis is not the university professor that John Paul II and Benedict XVI had been in their pre-papal lives. And while that model of preparing for the papacy served the Church well for thirty-five years, it’s not the only possible model. Now, rather than a professor who learned how to be a pastor, the Church has been given a pastor who has long experience of being a pastor.
Nonetheless, I was struck last May by Bergoglio’s sharp mind, his familiarity with issues throughout the world Church, and his prudence in judging people and situations. He was, for example, completely realistic and lucid about the Church’s situation in Latin America. Rather than complaining about Evangelical Protestant “sheep-rustling,” as more than a few Latin American churchmen do, the archbishop spoke with insight and conviction about the imperative of Catholicism rediscovering the power of the gospel through personal conversion to Jesus Christ.
A man of the New Evangelization. The new pope played a significant role in shaping the Latin American bishops’ 2007 “Aparecida Document,” which embraced the New Evangelization and put it at the center of the Church’s life. In our conversation, the man who would become pope made clear his understanding that a kept Church—“kept” in the sense of legal establishment, cultural habit, or both—had no future in the twenty-first-century West, given the acids of secularism. Pope Francis is a man, I conclude, who intends to go on evangelical offense: It will be all gospel, all proposal, all evangelism, all the time.
A man of reform. We spoke of the Latin American edition of my book The Courage To Be Catholic, for which he thanked me. And in discussing Vatican affairs, then-Cardinal Bergoglio displayed a shrewd, but not cynical, grasp of just what was wrong with the Church’s central bureaucratic machinery, and why. Thus I think we can expect the new pope to lead the Church in a purification and renewal of the episcopate, the priesthood, the religious life, and the Curia, because he understands that scandal, corruption, and incompetence are impediments to the gospel-centered mission I describe in Evangelical Catholicism: Deep Reform in the 21st Century Church.
A man of freedom rightly understood. In addition to Pope Francis’ lifetime commitment to the poor I’d also note his commitment to human rights and democracy, both of which are under severe pressure in Argentina. The new pope knows the fragility of democratic self-governance, and will work to shore up democracy’s eroding moral-cultural foundations throughout the West.
Habemus papam. Thanks be to God.
George Weigel is Distinguished Senior Fellow of the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, D.C. His previous “On the Square” articles can be found here.
Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.
Comments:
Obama knew exactly what he was doing by sending these two renegades, who not so incidentally represent the Democratic line on these vital issues, to the papal installation. It was a challenge to Francis to do the right thing or the easy thing. There is no way that a man as politically keen and knowledgeable in global issues could have been unaware of the malice of the challenge and the importance of the moment. I am sad to say that the pope failed the test big time. I don't see how he can possibly undo the damage this fiasco will cause. I hope I live to see the next pope and I hope that he will be more staunch in defense of the core doctrines of the faith.
I'm frankly very tired of being humiliated in my faith by those charged with upholding it.
Unhappily,
Richard
Mr. Weigel speaks of the New Evangelization, but he leaves out some of the main points that Pope Francis has made in his first week of the papacy, which is a return to Jesus' overriding concern for the anawim, the poor and vulnerable among us. We must be a people who live moral lives, both in terms of our relationship to God but just as importantly in terms of our relationship to others. The two great commandments go hand in hand, and we cannot obey one without obeying the other.
I'm just not sure Mr. Weigel gets it. Much of what he wrote seems to try to defend what he surmised (or rationalized) from the conversations he had with Cardinal Bergoglio in the recent past - much like his spin on Caritas in Veritate back in 2009.
When we say we are pro-life, we mean it for all stages of life, and we defend the dignity of all those who are vulnerable.
As for those who are more worried about who gets the Eucharist than anything else - everyone comes to the table as a sinner and someone in need of salvation. When I distribute Communion, I don't ask to review everyone's credentials. I simply pray that by consuming the Body of Christ that they may come to follow him more closely. The small-minded, phariasic adherence to certain doctrinal principles is counter to the Gospel and does not benefit the Church.
By the way, I was at the Installation Mass in Rome yesterday, and it was magnificent! Mr. Weigel was at the PNAC afterwards.
Blessings to all!
The small-minded and narrow
http://www.lifenews.com/2013/03/20/pro-abortion-biden-and-pelosi-received-communion-at-mass-for-pope-francis/
Best,
Richard
I don't think anyone here is more worried about who gets to receive the eucharist than anything else. Unless you can read minds.
However, if you're not worried about people receiving communion who are formal heretics (not saying you are) than that is a little suspicious because it is a great violence against their person. Not only do they bring condemnation upon themselves, but it is a double death they are inviting. Not only are they taking communion unworthily, but they are taking communion without faith (meaning they receive no grace from the sacrament).
God bless Pope Francis, God bless us all. May we all strive to know and to do God's will.
"To those of you who judge (condemn) Biden, Pelosi, et al. - will you also show at least similar passion for protecting the other vulnerable people among us? "
They remind me of the passages where Jesus exposes the hypocrisy and pretentions of the Pharisees, in that what they do is for the approbation of other men, not God. While publicly pronouncing their faith, they act counter to what God would have them do, whether it was helping to ease the burdens of the less fortunate, or protecting the most vulnerable of our society.
Regarding the second part of your statement above, it is for us, as Christians, to assist those in need. Pawning that responsibility off on the government, through the payment of taxes and support for governmental social welfare programs is not what God intended for us. Loving your neighbor as yourself means taking personal action because, as you well know, Jesus will answer us, ‘Amen, I say to you, what you did not do for one of these least ones, you did not do for me.’
http://catholicexchange.com/biden-and-pelosis-in-your-face-to-pope-francis/
Best,
Richard
BUENOS AIRES, October 5, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - In the wake of a clandestine abortion performed on a retarded woman with the help of the nation’s health minister, Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio and other Catholic authorities have let loose a torrent of criticism against the promoters of the "death sentence" for unborn children in Argentina, as well as other anti-life policies and customs.
In a speech given to a gathering of priests and laity on October 2nd, the cardinal pointed out that people say that "we aren’t in agreement with the death penalty," but "in Argentina we have the death penalty. A child conceived by the rape of a mentally ill or retarded woman can be condemned to death."
The cardinal made the remarks while presenting the final version of the "Aparecida Document", a joint statement of the bishops of Latin America regarding the situation of the Church in their countries. The document, approved by Pope Benedict XVI in July of this year, makes a very clear statement regarding the consequences of supporting abortion, disallowing holy communion for anyone who facilitates an abortion, including politicians.
The text states in paragraph 436 that "we should commit ourselves to ‘eucharistic coherence’, that is, we should be conscious that people cannot receive holy communion and at the same time act or speak against the commandments, in particular when abortion, euthanasia, and other serious crimes against life and family are facilitated. This responsibility applies particularly to legislators, governors, and health professionals."
Richard
There is much talk about the New Evangelization today. Mr. Weigel has certainly written about it. It can successfully take several forms in its expression. But if we think it's mainly about the pharisaic adherence to rules, then I guarantee you it will fail.
One very good framework for the New Evangelization is the 1993 document from the U.S. Bishops entitled "Communities of Salt and Light." It is a wonderful expression of what it means to live out the fullness of our faith. It is definitely pro-life, and I believe it also conforms very well to what Pope Francis has proclaimed thus far in his papacy.
God's blessings to all as we enter Holy Week.
There are people you can meet in one hour and you can make a statement like this I read.
This is not the case unless you have a lot of more information regarding former Cardinal Bergoglio.
There had been a lot of persecutions in Buenos Aires.
For example, and this is just one : Do you know that Buenos Aires is one of the worst diocesis in Argentina in terms of number of vocations (versus population) to be priest ?
The murder of fifty million unborn children is far more important than whatever "modern" public relations/marketing friendly slogans you come up with--like "the New Evangelization", which seems to be a scared, defensive reaction to "Evangelical" Protestant Christianity, not a proud act of Roman Catholic culture. (You have to have strong, REAL, orthodox Roman Catholic communities and, if we can even imagine it anymore, Roman Catholic countries for that.)
The murder of all those children couldn't happen without politicians like them. Being a Roman Catholic, you can convince me there's a reason not to kill them--but giving them Holy Communion is heretical and absurd!


