Edward Feser is associate professor of philosophy at Pasadena City College.

Edward Feser teaches philosophy at Pasadena City College.

Edward Feser is the author of The Last Superstition: A Refutation of the New Atheism.

Edward Feser is associate professor of philosophy at Pasadena City College and author of Aquinas: A Beginner’s Guide (Oneworld) and The Last Superstition: A Refutation of the New Atheism (St. Augustine Press).

Edward Feser is associate professor of philosophy at Pasadena City College and author of Aquinas: A Beginner’s Guide and The Last Superstition.

Edward Feser, for instance, issued a robust if confused denunciation, accusing me of numerous logical errors I did not commit and of being a Humean modernizer who doubts reason’s natural orientation toward the good. I suppose I should savor that as a refreshin

Edward Feser’s review of Ray Kurzweil’s How to Create a Mind in this issue. • Massie’s review begins, we’ll mention in case you like this kind of thing, by calling Craig Raine’s novel The Divine Comedy “a poet’s novel,” explaining that this isn’t necessaril

Edward Feser, Francesca Murphy, James Davison Hunter, and others engage something as ambitious as Robert Bellah’s account of the emergence of religious cultures from prehuman life to the centuries just prior to the time of Christ. Fundamental questions kept

Edward Feser Oneworld Publications, 224 pages, $14.95 Do not let the subtitle deter you. While Aquinas is “a beginner’s guide,” it is rigorous and accessible philosophy at its best. Even seasoned Thomists will benefit from Edward Feser’s analytic precisi

Edward Feser is the author of The Last Superstition: A Refutation of the New Atheism  and Aquinas. He blogs about philosophy here. Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.

Edward Feser is the author of The Last Superstition: A Refutation of the New Atheism and Aquinas. He blogs about philosophy here. RESOURCES Thomas Nagel, Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False Edwa

Edward Feser, for instance, issued a robust if confused denunciation, accusing me of numerous logical errors I did not commit and of being a Humean modernizer who doubts reason’s natural orientation toward the good. I suppose I should savor that as a refreshin

Edward Feser in the June/July issue of First Things, even if one grants that string theory is true, Krauss has already conceded the very medieval axiom he thought he was dispatching, since, after all, a “brane” (assuming it exists) is something. Checkmate. No

Edward Feser, who points out that it doesn’t explain why there is something rather than nothing, while Jeremy Beer of the Front Porch Republic finds that even conservatives have lost a sense of place in his review of Craig G. Bartholomew’s Where Mortals Dwell:

Edward Feser—but I think that can be largely ignored. To be perfectly frank, most natural law arguments on the matter are hopelessly ad hoc constructions, consisting in prescriptions unconvincingly and willfully attached to endlessly contestable descriptions (

Edward Feser, measures the traditional criteria of the just war according to the moral manuals of the pre-Vatican II period, in order to employ a fair meaning of "traditional," at least from (one would think) the paleoconservative side. In doing so,