Support First Things by turning your adblocker off or by making a  donation. Thanks!

The mainstream bioethicists are mightily ticked because National Review’s Ramesh Ponurru (and others) resist their perceived wisdom on ESCR funding and ethics. But in attacking Ponurru, they bit off more than they can chew. In his usual methodical manner, the NR writer demonstrates that he isn’t the one spouting dubious facts.


Comments are visible to subscribers only. Log in or subscribe to join the conversation.

Tags

Loading...

Filter First Thoughts Posts

Related Articles