As we move into health care reform, the issue of health care rationing is coming to the fore. Instituting Futile Care Theory—the putative right of a doctor to refuse wanted life-sustaining treatment based on his or her values as to the quality of the patient’s life—is the opening gambit because it targets those thought to be on their last legs. Now, the Journal of Critical Care Medicine has published an article intended to open the debate as to whether doctors have a social duty to impose medical futility. This is nothing less than the deprofessionalization of medicine by imposing upon (or granting to) doctors a dual and sometimes conflicting mandate—one to provide the patient optimal care and the other to deny optimal care based on social duty. For more details, check out my post over at Secondhand Smoke .
While I have you, can I ask you something? I’ll be quick.
Twenty-five thousand people subscribe to First Things. Why can’t that be fifty thousand? Three million people read First Things online like you are right now. Why can’t that be four million?
Let’s stop saying “can’t.” Because it can. And your year-end gift of just $50, $100, or even $250 or more will make it possible.
How much would you give to introduce just one new person to First Things? What about ten people, or even a hundred? That’s the power of your charitable support.
Make your year-end gift now using this secure link or the button below.
