Jordan Ballor has an intriguing post on “the relationship between the churchs approach to charity and the creation of the welfare state” as discussed in Lester DeKoster and Gerard Berghoef 1980 book, The Deacons Handbook: A Manual of Stewardship :
DeKoster and Berghoef argue in The Church and the Welfare State that The Church is largely responsible for the coming of the modern welfare community. But they also contend that the diaconal office is the key to answering the challenge posed by the welfare state: The Church could be largely responsible for purging welfare of its faults and problems. IF enough deacons caught the vision!
The church helped to bring about the welfare state in two ways. First, the Church embodied the idea of loving self-sacrifice in service of others. The Word which the Church proclaims demands charity and justice for the poor. As this Word has permeated at least the Western world, an alerted public conscience has demanded public welfare, write DeKoster and Berghoef. The Church is the parent of the welfare community.
But this welfare community became secularized when the Church did not, and perhaps in some respects could not, measure up to her own ideals. Not all the starving were fed, not all of the homeless given shelter, not all of the oppressed and exploited relieved. The cries of the needy ascended to heaven. The Lord answered with the welfare state. The government undertakes to do what the Church demands and then fails to achieve by herself.
In this sense, the welfare state is understood to be Gods preservational (thus imperfect) answer to the failed duty of the Church:
Thus the Church is, both by commission and by omission, author of the welfare state. Deacons start from here. Government has undertaken to do what conscience, tutored out of the Scriptures, demands but fails, through the Church, entirely to achieve.
Read more . . .