Pseudonymous history professor Rufus F. remarks on the difficulty we have hearingreally hearingmusic that is mediated by digital technology :
Im always amazed to read essays on classical music from the 18th and 19th centuries. The writers, often with no more musical training than I have (i.e. none), also would have necessarily had to listen to the pieces performed live, maybe only once. And yet, their attention was such that they picked up on nuances that elude me after hearing these works dozens of times. There are many works I have never heard unmediated by some form of recording and playback technology. And I wonder if music, possibly the most abstract of the arts, doesnt demand direct attention bordering on meditation. When I read Prousts description of Swanns total rapture at the little phrase of Vinteuils sonata (fiction, but seemingly rooted in a common experience of the late 1800s), its hard not to wonder if the technology that we now live our lives steeped in doesnt somehow objectify music, turning it into a thing that can be easily chopped up, replicated, and manipulated, or silenced and neglected; if it doesnt also handicap our aesthetic and emotional response by reducing the spiritual in music to its empty digital husk.
Read more . . .
While I have you, can I ask you something? I’ll be quick.
Twenty-five thousand people subscribe to First Things. Why can’t that be fifty thousand? Three million people read First Things online like you are right now. Why can’t that be four million?
Let’s stop saying “can’t.” Because it can. And your year-end gift of just $50, $100, or even $250 or more will make it possible.
How much would you give to introduce just one new person to First Things? What about ten people, or even a hundred? That’s the power of your charitable support.
Make your year-end gift now using this secure link or the button below.