Support First Things by turning your adblocker off or by making a  donation. Thanks!

I am receiving media requests to comment on the embryonic stem cell human trial.  I already have here at SHS.  But I did again today over at The Corner. I point out how the media often fails to report more impressive human studies with adult stem cells.  From “Media Misses the Larger Stem Cell Story:”

I am not sure why the media so clearly cares more about embryonic-stem-cell research than the ethically uncontentious kinds, such as adult-stem-cell research and the advances with induced pluripotent stem cells. But the headlines usually attached to ESCR advances — as opposed to more notable successes with adult stem cells, which often get no headlines at all — prove the old maxim about the media not letting the facts interfere with the story they want to tell.

I discuss some of the adult stem cell early human trial success and conclude:
In my more cynical moments, I think that many in the media simply consider adult stem cells to be the wrong kind. In any event, the stem-cell issue isn’t a science debate, but an ethics debate. Whatever the outcome of this latest medical trial, that is not going to change.

And, of course, as I have repeatedly warned, ultimately it isn’t just about stem cells, but human cloning.


Comments are visible to subscribers only. Log in or subscribe to join the conversation.

Tags

Loading...

Filter First Thoughts Posts

Related Articles