Theres blood in the water of the MSNBC snark tank. Friday it was announced that Keith Olbermann had been suspendedindefinitely. He apparently violated a corporate policy that forbids newsies making contributions to political campaigns without prior approval. As of now, its unclear whether that is spelled out in his contract or not.
While I wont pretend to be a fan, dont look for any schadenfruede here. Based on whats been disclosed thus far, theres no reason for the man to lose his job.
Why shouldnt Mr. Olbermann be free to spend his mammon stripping shellac where he chooses? If that be on the slippery deck of an ideological Titanic, so what? Besides, what jury would indict, let alone, convict him on charges of being an actual news reporter? Last I heard, you still need evidence for that sort of thing.
What are his superiors up to then? Is this a gesture to the next Congress, a bold first step into a belle-epoque of civility, an invitation to tea? Or is it perhaps a portent of whats in store once Comcast takes over at NBC-Universal? Who knows, maybe its part of some dark pact that will oblige Rupert Murdoch to sacrifice one of his own.
Whatever the case, for Misters Schultz, ODonnell, and Matthews, as well as for Ms. Maddow, the road ahead looks suddenly uncertain. Until this gets sorted, all I can say is, what a difference a (Tues)day makes.
While I have you, can I ask you something? I’ll be quick.
Twenty-five thousand people subscribe to First Things. Why can’t that be fifty thousand? Three million people read First Things online like you are right now. Why can’t that be four million?
Let’s stop saying “can’t.” Because it can. And your year-end gift of just $50, $100, or even $250 or more will make it possible.
How much would you give to introduce just one new person to First Things? What about ten people, or even a hundred? That’s the power of your charitable support.
Make your year-end gift now using this secure link or the button below.