Amy Sullivan wonders about the Republican embrace of the anti-Christian Ayn Rand. Now, I don’t think that Republicans should be taking political advice from Sullivan, but one has to wonder how anyone can square his or her faith with Rand’s almost Nietzschean libertarianism.
This is not to say that, in my view, a Christian must embrace ‘big government.” Far from it. I think that there are multiple paths from various plausible versions of Christianity to limited government. Consider, for example, this and this . (I hasten to add that I’m not necessarily endorsing either of these views.)
To be politically successful, the Republican Party must offer the proverbial big tent. There should be no litmus test for admission. Well, I take that back: I don’t see how a party that purports to be faith-friendly can accommodate those who are actively hostile to Christianity. I have no evidence that the folks Sullivan cites are hostile, but there is substantial evidence that Rand herself was. Once again, I ask: how can one embrace both a Randian worldview or moral anthropology and a Christian worldview or moral anthropology?
Discuss.
While I have you, can I ask you something? I’ll be quick.
Twenty-five thousand people subscribe to First Things. Why can’t that be fifty thousand? Three million people read First Things online like you are right now. Why can’t that be four million?
Let’s stop saying “can’t.” Because it can. And your year-end gift of just $50, $100, or even $250 or more will make it possible.
How much would you give to introduce just one new person to First Things? What about ten people, or even a hundred? That’s the power of your charitable support.
Make your year-end gift now using this secure link or the button below.
