Support First Things by turning your adblocker off or by making a  donation. Thanks!

Our friend Matt Franck is absolutely right that those of our friends who use the “no religious test” clause of the Constitution to condemn religious bigotry have got it absolutely wrong.  There are many evils associated with religious bigotry, but the solution is not to assume that a Constitutional provision that prohibits barring all but the orthodox from officeholding also applies to the private deliberations of voters and the appropriate range of political speech in the public square.  The interpretation of the no religious test clause propounded by good people like Bill Bennett and William McGurn would put it at odds with at least two clauses of the First Amendment.

To be sure, in a sinful world religious freedom and freedom of speech will be abused.  But there are plenty of ways of identifying those abuses without misinterpreting the Constitution and further weakening its barriers against an all-encompassing government.

Dear Reader,

While I have you, can I ask you something? I’ll be quick.

Twenty-five thousand people subscribe to First Things. Why can’t that be fifty thousand? Three million people read First Things online like you are right now. Why can’t that be four million?

Let’s stop saying “can’t.” Because it can. And your year-end gift of just $50, $100, or even $250 or more will make it possible.

How much would you give to introduce just one new person to First Things? What about ten people, or even a hundred? That’s the power of your charitable support.

Make your year-end gift now using this secure link or the button below.
GIVE NOW

Comments are visible to subscribers only. Log in or subscribe to join the conversation.

Tags

Loading...

Filter First Thoughts Posts

Related Articles