How you say PC?

As Joe Carter reported earlier , the now former editor of the French edition of Vogue tries, or tried, to include “something every month that is — how you say? — not politically correct. A little bit at the limit. Sex, nudity, a bit rock’n’roll, a sense of humour.” . . . . Continue Reading »

Moral Blind Spots

The Washington Post has an interesting article in its archives: “What will future generations condemn us for?” The author, Kwame Anthony Appiah, notes that throughout history, societies have had moral blind spots:Looking back at such horrors [such as slavery and lynching], it is easy to . . . . Continue Reading »

PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICAL SCIENCE

Here’s the table of contents for the forthcoming issue (Jan.-March.): ARTICLES Health Care and the Technological Project 1 Tom Merrill The Demise of Feminist Communitarianism 9 Jon A. Shields and Steven Serna The Modern Foundations of Burke’s Conservatism 16 Andrea Radasanu Beyond the . . . . Continue Reading »

D’Souza on Obama

Some months ago I expressed my skepticism about Dinesh D’Souza’s thesis that the best way to understand Barack Obama involves seeing him as trying to fulfill his father’s anti-colonialist vision. I argued that mainstream American liberalism, especially its hothouse academic forms, . . . . Continue Reading »

Justice and the Priesthood

In today’s second ” On the Square ” essay, Fr. Thomas Guarino (a past contributor to First Things and a member of Evangelicals and Catholics Together ) writes on concerns about draconian juridical policies within Catholic dioceses, and the effect they hold on the theology of . . . . Continue Reading »

The Best Gay Marriage Can Do?

” What Is Marriage? ” Robert P. George, Ryan Anderson, and Sherif Girgis’ recent article on marriage in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy , has generated something of a discourse among scholars of opposing views, even being called a “succinct and clear . . . . Continue Reading »

The Spirit of the Constitution

Much has been made, from all quarters, of the Republicans’ plans to begin the new session of Congress with a reading of the Constitution. Some have derided it as a kind of theater, implying that it therefore can’t be serious and meaningful. (Tell that to my wife, by profession an actor . . . . Continue Reading »

No New Crusades

“It seems to me that beginnings of a stealth New Crusade may be taking root in the minds of some of my Christian correspondents,” writes Elizabeth Scalia in today’s “On the Square” article. The proper Christian response, she says in Surrender Unto Surrender , is a . . . . Continue Reading »