A Rabbi Remembers Pope Benedict

The one and only time I met Pope Benedict XVI was when he was Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger. The time was 1988, and the place was St. Peter’s Lutheran Church in New York. The occasion was a lecture by the cardinal arranged by Fr. (then Lutheran Pastor) Richard John Neuhaus. The occasion was . . . . Continue Reading »

On the Square Today

R.R. Reno on Benedict and the next pope : Ratzinger fought an intellectual battle for sanity in the long decade of theological insanity that followed the Council. When he was appointed as head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith by John Paul II in 1981 he was no longer a young turk . . . . Continue Reading »

Fr. Robert Barron on the Next Pope

Fr. Robert Barron discusses Pope Benedict XVI’s possible successors on the Today show: Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news , world news , and news about the economy For more speculation on the papabili , see Michael Brendan Dougherty’s list at Business Insider . . . . . Continue Reading »

Pomocon POLITICAL Realism

Thanks to Jason for his very instructive post below on Wendell Berry. For me, it’s not so much that Berry is for same-sex marriage these days. It’s that he thinks—with his characteristic self-righteousness—that anyone who disagrees with him is a bigoted jerk in the thrall of . . . . Continue Reading »

First Links — 2.12.13

“Pope Emeritus”? Ed Peters, In the Light of the Law Heart Work Louis Markos, Touchstone Money, Culture, Authenticity Marc Barnes, Bad Catholic Should a Reformed Pastor Be Charismatic? Anugrah Kumar, Christian Post How Timbuktu Saved Its Books Tristan McConnell, Harper’s . . . . Continue Reading »

A Port William Statement?

Wendell Berry’s comments on gay marriage last month raised some eyebrows among conservatives. Were his comments a ‘ Grandpa Simpson moment ’ or the logical outcome of Porcher presuppositions?  Below are snippets of what he said. On Nature: “If it can be argued that . . . . Continue Reading »

Which Party Of John C. Calhoun?

This line from Sam Tanenhaus’s article on the “original sin” of conservatism jumped out at me: Calhoun’s innovation was to develop a radical theory of minority-interest democracy based on his mastery of the Constitution’s quirky arithmetic, which often subordinated the . . . . Continue Reading »