Debate Thoughts

1. So I was right about everything . The questions leaned farther left than would have been likely if Crowley had to take full responsibility for what was asked. Crowley spent a lot more effort interrupting Romney even though Obama was doing more talking. Crowley even intervened in the conversation . . . . Continue Reading »

A Nation of Takers, Yes or No

For those of you in the New York area: Tomorrow night Nicholas Eberstadt will be arguing with William Galston about whether entitlements corrupt those they intend to sustain or a necessary, civic responsibility that support us all. The debate continues the debate begin in Eberstadt’s . . . . Continue Reading »

Particle Man

Professor Anthony Gill, a political scientist at the University of Washington, talks to particle physicist Dr. Stephen M. Barr in a Research on Religion podcast. The casual, hourlong discussion veers from such topics as determinism and the role of the observer (get ready to reopen the catbox), . . . . Continue Reading »

Horror: The Revolt of Conscience

Tonight, the second season of American Horror Story begins. I thought last season was an excellent, though perhaps unintended , cultural acknowledgement that along with sexual “liberation” come unintended consequences – particularly regret of voluntary sterility. The realities . . . . Continue Reading »

On the Square Today

George Weigel on economy and empowerment : A robust economy is not only an economic imperative; it is a moral and cultural imperative. A robust economy makes honorable work possible for all who wish to be responsible for their own lives and the lives of their loved ones. And work, according to . . . . Continue Reading »

Doubts About Mitt

My colleague Matthew Schmitz has asked  whether Romney betrayed social conservatives  at Tuesday’s debate, and his answer is no. As he points out, Romney technically did not contradict his earlier statements about the HHS mandate, and considering that the debate moderator was . . . . Continue Reading »

Had I but Time Enough

With all the important issues at stake in the presidential and vice presidential debates, it takes a small and pettifogging disposition to be concerned with a matter of fairness. But since John Rawls talks so much about procedural justice, and since no enlightened professor today would dare label . . . . Continue Reading »

First Links — 10.17.12

A Fire-Stained and Blackened Cathedral: An Interview with Joshua Hren Meredith Wise, Dappled Things Understanding Internet Trolling Whitney Phillips,  The Atlantic Why I Like Denominations Roger E. Olson, Patheos Vatican II: The “Long Argument” is a Distraction Robert Royal, The . . . . Continue Reading »