A Little More

So here’s the BIG THINK version of my below. Pete went further than I did the debate portion of the campaign somewhat of a freak show. Doesn’t mean he’s wrong. He’s also right that it would be right for candidates to call Paul out on his actual policy views—the ones . . . . Continue Reading »

Thoughts On Peter Lawler’s Thoughts

1.  The current primary-dominated system for selecting presidential candidates has its flaws, but I don’t see us going back to a system in which a conclave of party leaders choose the nominee.  A party leader-dominated process like the convention would have spared us some of the . . . . Continue Reading »

Chesterton and the Bible

An fyi, though I can find no information on the web about it: On February 27th, the G. K. Chesterton Institute (publisher of The Chesterton Review , on whose board I sit) and the American Bible Society will be sponsoring a conference on  Chesterton and the Bible. It will be held at the . . . . Continue Reading »

A Brief Reply to Jacques Berlinerblau

My previous post on the rise of ‘secular studies’ seems to have touched a nerve with Jacques Berlinerblau, who in a post  for the Chronicle of Higher Education blog  fulminates furiously. First, it’s worth restating that many of the critiques I voiced (particularly those . . . . Continue Reading »

On the Square Today

In his latest On the Square column , Russell E. Saltzman says we should call it Christ’s Mass and let Best Buy keep the holiday: Who cares, first, if Best Buy or Gap “keeps” Christmas as a feature of their annual sales hustle? Hearing  What Child is This? . . . . Continue Reading »

How Martin Luther Went Viral

The Economist explains how social media in the sixteenth century helped bring about the Reformation : Scholars have long debated the relative importance of printed media, oral transmission and images in rallying popular support for the Reformation. Some have championed the central role of printing, . . . . Continue Reading »