Peter J. Leithart is President of the Theopolis Institute, Birmingham, Alabama, and an adjunct Senior Fellow at New St. Andrews College. He is author, most recently, of Gratitude: An Intellectual History (Baylor).
Wright writes that Paul’s “re-reading” of the OT is not “a matter merely of typology, picking a few earlier themes and watching the same patterns repeating themselves, though this also happens often enough.” Rather, “Paul had in mind an essentially historical and . . . . Continue Reading »
Wise words from Wright ( Paul: In Fresh Perspective ) about the biblical assessment of empire: “Things are not straightforward, by our Procrustean standards, in any of these books [Amos, Isaiah, Daniel]. When God acts to rescue the three righteous Jews from the furnace, or Daniel from the den . . . . Continue Reading »
As many dramatically-inclined Bible teachers have said, the page that separates Old and New Testaments shouldn’t be there. It’s theologically indefensible since it bewitches us into thinking that we have two Bibles instead of one. That page is a disaster for literary reasons too. . . . . Continue Reading »
I offer some thoughts on the cultural significance of the Eucharist on the First Things site today: http://www.firstthings.com/ . . . . Continue Reading »
I was recently asked to identify the biggest cultural challenge facing American Evangelicals. In my judgment, the biggest cultural challenge is not out there in the culture but internal“I almost said, inherent“to Evangelicalism: the persistent marginalization of the Eucharist in Evangelical church life, piety, and political engagement. Evangelicals will be incapable of responding to the specific challenges of our time with any steadiness or effect until the Eucharist becomes the criterion of all Christian cultural thinking and the source from which all genuinely Christian cultural engagement springs… . Continue Reading »
In his essay in A Broken Beauty , Gordon Fuglie offers this description of The Art World: It “is in truth a comparatively small and elite cultural entity. It takes itself very seriously, is adequately funded if not always wealthy, and is narrowly self-defined and, as a consequence, . . . . Continue Reading »
In his Rembrandt, Life and Work (Landmarks in Art History) , Jakob Rosenberg argued that Rembrandt rejected the classicist ideal that beauty had to be fully controlled with clearly bounded lines. He notes that “for Rembrandt the essence of truth about man and nature lies in the ultimate . . . . Continue Reading »
God Himself is speech, language, Word. This is implicit in the opening pages of the Bible. God created heaven and earth, and when we see how that works in more detail we find that He does it by speech. The God revealed in Genesis 1 is a Creator, Maker, Actor, but He is all these things because He . . . . Continue Reading »
In an intriguing TNR review of Walter Isaacson’s Steve Jobs , Evgeny Morozov says that the Apple “philosophy” - a form of pop-Platonism emphasizing the link between “essence” and function, purity, unornamented sleekness - cannot be understood except as an expression of . . . . Continue Reading »
In Ezekiel 9, the Lord tells the prophet to mark everyone who mounrs over Jerusalem with a “sign” on the forehead. The word “sign” is not the typical word for “sign,” but rather the name of the letter taw , the final letter of the Hebrew alphabet. Daniel Block ( . . . . Continue Reading »
influential
journal of
religion and
public life
Subscribe
Latest Issue
Support First Things