<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>First Things RSS Feed - Antonin Scalia</title>
		<link>https://www.firstthings.com/author/antonin-scalia</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.firstthings.com/rss/author/antonin-scalia" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description></description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2025 First Things. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
		<managingEditor>ft@firstthings.com (The Editors)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>ft@firstthings.com (The Editors)</webMaster>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:53:35 -0500</pubDate>
		
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<item>
			<title>A Nation Under God</title>
			<guid>https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2019/04/a-nation-under-god</guid>
			<link>https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2019/04/a-nation-under-god</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
			
			<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Our country has a long tradition of official encouragement of religion on a non-sectarian basis. That tradition reflects the understanding of the nation&rsquo;s founders that, as George Washington declared in his Farewell Address, religion and morality are &ldquo;indispensable supports&rdquo; of &ldquo;political prosperity&rdquo; and that we should &ldquo;with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion.&rdquo;</em>
</p> <p><em><a href="https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2019/04/a-nation-under-god">Continue Reading </a> &raquo;</em></p>]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Law & Language</title>
			<guid>https://www.firstthings.com/article/2005/11/law--language-26</guid>
			<link>https://www.firstthings.com/article/2005/11/law--language-26</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
			
			<description><![CDATA[<p>  
<em> Law&rsquo;s Quandary <br>  </em>
 by Steven D. Smith 
<br>
  
<em> Harvard University press, 222 pages, $45 <br>  <br>  <br>  </em>
  
</p> <p><em><a href="https://www.firstthings.com/article/2005/11/law--language-26">Continue Reading </a> &raquo;</em></p>]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>God&rsquo;s Justice and Ours</title>
			<guid>https://www.firstthings.com/article/2002/05/gods-justice-and-ours</guid>
			<link>https://www.firstthings.com/article/2002/05/gods-justice-and-ours</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2002 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
			
			<description><![CDATA[<p> Before proceeding to discuss the morality of capital punishment, I want to make clear that my views on the subject have nothing to do with how I vote in  capital cases that come before the Supreme Court. That statement would not be  true if I subscribed to the conventional fallacy that the Constitution is a  &ldquo;living document&rdquo;&mdash;that is, a text that means from age to age whatever the society  (or perhaps the Court) thinks it ought to mean.  
</p> <p><em><a href="https://www.firstthings.com/article/2002/05/gods-justice-and-ours">Continue Reading </a> &raquo;</em></p>]]></description>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
