George Grant

Tue, 01 Nov 1994 00:00:00 -0500

In considering Canada’s contribution to twentieth-century intellectual life, one might think of the novels of Margaret Atwood and Robertson Davies, or the literary criticism of Northrop Frye, or even the flashy insights of Marshall McLuhan. For some, there might be the philosophy of Charles Taylor. In terms of actual impact on Canadian intellectuals in the last generation, however, it is George Grant who looms as a major figure. He deserves to be better known in the United States, especially to readers of First Things. And the recent biography by William Christian is a major contribution to furthering the public’s acquaintance with Grant’s personality, career, and thought.

George Grant was a professor of philosophy (mostly at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario) who had a wide audience through his public lectures and contributions to mass circulation magazines. He disliked the narrow analytic approach of his discipline and ignored fashionable trends in favor of the grand picture. Grant was a Christian, a deep thinker, even something of a mystic, and a commentator with insight into developments not only in Canada but in the entire Western world.

One reason for his lack of recognition in the United States could be his reputation as an anti-American. He was vehemently opposed to the Vietnam war, and he put this in a larger context of a critique of American imperialism. In this respect he provided useful ammunition for Canadian leftists in the 1960s and 1970s.

False conclusions were drawn, however, about Grant’s politics. As this book shows, Grant usually voted conservative, was an ally of the unfashionable John Diefenbaker, and throughout his adult career was strongly antiliberal (both political party and ideology). What Grant was opposed to was statist liberalism, mega-government, and the patterns imposed on modern life by bureaucratic thinking.

He was born in Toronto in 1918, educated at Queen’s University (in Kingston, Ontario), and, as a Rhodes Scholar, at Oxford during two periods interrupted by the Second World War. One of the strongest impressions on Grant at Oxford was the clear and forceful thought of C. S. Lewis at meetings of the Socratic Club.

England during the blitz, and also in a time of personal turmoil, he had an experience of God (reminiscent of what Lewis himself described in Surprised by Joy ). Grant was getting off his bicycle to open a gate; he walked his bike through and closed the gate behind him, and “as he did so, it just came to him at once, in a moment and forever, that all was finally well, that God existed.”

Originally Presbyterian by family background, Grant joined and remained in the Anglican Church of Canada, though at times unhappily when church committees took liberal stands on abortion and euthanasia. A major theme of Grant’s work is the relationship of mainline Christianity to North American culture, and this is one reason why he deserves attention: he offers a valuable perspective on American culture, from outside-but not very far outside-of the United States. He knew us well.

He also knew where to look for truth. Although influenced by Kant and, for a while, by Hegel and David Strauss, the major influences on Grant’s thought were Plato, Augustine, and Simone Weil. Grant probably would be better known today if he had written the major work on technology or the freedom of the will that he once contemplated doing. As it is, his legacy takes the form of some powerful essays in a few slim collections: Technology and Empire, English-Speaking Justice , and Technology and Justice (the last two are in print in the U.S. from the University of Notre Dame Press).

William Christian has drawn on a large body of correspondence, and on personal meetings with Grant’s wife, Sheila (who shared in some of Grant’s projects, especially the anti-abortion essays). The portrait that emerges is interesting and well drawn. Grant had a flair for drama, loved Mozart, and was often unkempt in dress. Mainly what the book conveys, however, is a deep understanding of and sympathy for his intellectual contribution. Grant’s convictions as a Christian were an integral part of his worldview, which the book convincingly demonstrates.

The author draws attention to one of Grant’s important insights-that Americans have no premodern history to go back to. There is a pre- Enlightenment Puritan heritage, of course; but for Grant the Puritans were already modern, at least in the crucial area of science and human progress. The tradition of contemplation, of understanding and enjoying (here Plato and Augustine are so important for Grant), has had little influence in America by comparison with the assumption that things in nature are meant to be used. This aspect of modernity goes back to the sixteenth century.

Another theme in Christian’s book is the focus Grant brought to the significance of the Roe v. Wade decision. Grant wrote of the position taken by Justice Harry Blackmun that it was not only ”monstrous,” but a warning to us. In that decision we were warned, Grant felt, that we no longer know in advance what justice requires us to do, but only whether something is or is not technologically possible. In this connection, Grant often quoted the words of Robert Oppenheimer: “If something is sweet, you have to go ahead with it.”

Grant’s antiliberalism was profound. He contrasted the traditional Greek view of justice, modified by Christianity, with the modern one:

Continue Reading »

First Things RSS Feed - Daniel Westberg

George Grant