<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>First Things RSS Feed - Robert A. Sirico</title>
		<link>https://www.firstthings.com/author/fr-robert-a-sirico</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.firstthings.com/rss/author/fr-robert-a-sirico" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description></description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2025 First Things. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
		<managingEditor>ft@firstthings.com (The Editors)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>ft@firstthings.com (The Editors)</webMaster>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:53:32 -0500</pubDate>
		
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<item>
			<title>Faithful and Invisible</title>
			<guid>https://www.firstthings.com/article/2024/06/faithful-and-invisible</guid>
			<link>https://www.firstthings.com/article/2024/06/faithful-and-invisible</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
			<author>ft@firstthings.com (Robert A. Sirico)</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>On December 18, 2023, the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith issued the declaration 
<em><a href="https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_ddf_doc_20231218_fiducia-supplicans_en.html" target="_blank">Fiducia Supplicans</a></em>
, which granted permission for Catholic priests to bestow blessings upon couples in &ldquo;irregular situations&rdquo; and same-sex couples. Discussions surrounding the meaning and implications of this letter have been extensive, occasioned by the confusion it generates and the theological inconsistencies it contains. Recently, along with Catholic leaders around the world, I signed a &ldquo;Filial Appeal&rdquo; addressed to cardinals and bishops expressing concerns about the repercussions and substance of 
<em>Fiducia Supplicans</em>
 and advocating for its withdrawal.
<br>
</p> <p><em><a href="https://www.firstthings.com/article/2024/06/faithful-and-invisible">Continue Reading </a> &raquo;</em></p>]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Profits and Peace </title>
			<guid>https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2008/10/profits-and-peace</guid>
			<link>https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2008/10/profits-and-peace</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
			<author>ft@firstthings.com (Robert A. Sirico)</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Prof. Timothy L. Fort has made a very interesting contribution to our understanding of the relationship between business and commerce in his recent book,  
<em> Prophets, Profits, and Peace: The Positive Role of Business in Promoting Religious Tolerance </em>
 . &#147;Religion affects politics,&#148; he writes. &#147;Why wouldn&#146;t we think that it would affect business, too?&#148;
</p> <p><em><a href="https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2008/10/profits-and-peace">Continue Reading </a> &raquo;</em></p>]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Friends of the Unrighteous Mammon</title>
			<guid>https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2008/09/friends-of-the-unrighteous-mam</guid>
			<link>https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2008/09/friends-of-the-unrighteous-mam</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
			<author>ft@firstthings.com (Robert A. Sirico)</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>What is the theological significance of wealth and its production? The debate rages over this issue in American public life today. But the debate is not new. It is quite ancient, and it has only grown in complexity and precision in recent times.
</p> <p><em><a href="https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2008/09/friends-of-the-unrighteous-mam">Continue Reading </a> &raquo;</em></p>]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Economics as Religion: From Samuelson to Chicago and Beyond</title>
			<guid>https://www.firstthings.com/article/2002/12/economics-as-religion-from-samuelson-to-chicago-and-beyond</guid>
			<link>https://www.firstthings.com/article/2002/12/economics-as-religion-from-samuelson-to-chicago-and-beyond</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
			<author>ft@firstthings.com (Robert A. Sirico)</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p> Economics, as a social science, occupies a peculiar space within academic and national life. Economists deal with acting, choosing human persons,and their behavior in the most fickle area of life, the commercial marketplace; yet economists employ mathematical devices drawn from physics and the hard sciences. Unlike hard scientists, they are not content to study and discover what is given and seek improvements only within this constrained framework. Economists also see themselves, in the words of that old progressive Thorstein Veblen, as &ldquo;keepers of the community&rsquo;s material welfare.&rdquo; They thus employ every manner of value and moral judgment in the practice of their science. 
</p> <p><em><a href="https://www.firstthings.com/article/2002/12/economics-as-religion-from-samuelson-to-chicago-and-beyond">Continue Reading </a> &raquo;</em></p>]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>How Partisan Are the Bishops?</title>
			<guid>https://www.firstthings.com/article/1996/10/003-how-partisan-are-the-bishops</guid>
			<link>https://www.firstthings.com/article/1996/10/003-how-partisan-are-the-bishops</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 1996 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
			<author>ft@firstthings.com (Robert A. Sirico)</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In preparation for the election year, the United States Catholic Conference (USCC) issued a statement on &#147;Political Responsibility.&#148; Numerous critics have asserted that the statement, despite its claim to be nonpartisan, aligns the Catholic Church with the positions of the Democratic Party, with the notable exception of abortion. Defenders of the USCC have vigorously challenged that assertion. A close comparison of passages from the USCC statement with passages from the 1992 platforms of the two major parties on the same topics (the platforms available to the writers of &#147;Political Responsibility&#148;) provides, I believe, the information necessary to judge the partisanship of the USCC statement.

 
<strong>  <center> I. Jobs </center>  </strong>
  
</p> <p><em><a href="https://www.firstthings.com/article/1996/10/003-how-partisan-are-the-bishops">Continue Reading </a> &raquo;</em></p>]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title> God and the Economists</title>
			<guid>https://www.firstthings.com/article/1992/04/god-and-the-economists</guid>
			<link>https://www.firstthings.com/article/1992/04/god-and-the-economists</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 1992 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
			<author>ft@firstthings.com (Robert A. Sirico)</author>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>  
<em> <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Reaching-Heaven-Earth-Theological-Economics/dp/0822630249/?tag=firstthings20-20" target="_blank">Reaching for Heaven on Earth: The Theological Meaning of Economics</a></em>
  
<br>
 by Robert H. Nelson 
<br>
 Rowman and Littlefield, 378 pages, $24.95 
</p> <p><em><a href="https://www.firstthings.com/article/1992/04/god-and-the-economists">Continue Reading </a> &raquo;</em></p>]]></description>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
