<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>First Things RSS Feed - James Kalb</title>
		<link>https://www.firstthings.com/author/james-kalb</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.firstthings.com/rss/author/james-kalb" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description></description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2025 First Things. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
		<managingEditor>ft@firstthings.com (The Editors)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>ft@firstthings.com (The Editors)</webMaster>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:55:32 -0500</pubDate>
		
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<item>
			<title>Technocracy Now</title>
			<guid>https://www.firstthings.com/article/2015/08/technocracy-now</guid>
			<link>https://www.firstthings.com/article/2015/08/technocracy-now</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2015 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
			
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The recently revised New York City Health Department form for parents requesting birth certificates asks the &ldquo;woman giving birth&rdquo; whether she is female or male. The question is obviously absurd. But why do absurdities of this sort keep popping up? And why do most people fall in line, pretending&mdash;at least in public&mdash;that they are perfectly sensible? The natural reaction is to roll our eyes: These things cannot be serious, and they will go away if we ignore them. But they do not go away, and the absurdities become more common, extreme, and compulsory.
</p> <p><em><a href="https://www.firstthings.com/article/2015/08/technocracy-now">Continue Reading </a> &raquo;</em></p>]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sex and the Religion of Me</title>
			<guid>https://www.firstthings.com/article/2014/12/sex-and-the-religion-of-me</guid>
			<link>https://www.firstthings.com/article/2014/12/sex-and-the-religion-of-me</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
			
			<description><![CDATA[<p></p> <p><em><a href="https://www.firstthings.com/article/2014/12/sex-and-the-religion-of-me">Continue Reading </a> &raquo;</em></p>]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Libertarian Limits</title>
			<guid>https://www.firstthings.com/article/2012/01/libertarian-limits</guid>
			<link>https://www.firstthings.com/article/2012/01/libertarian-limits</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
			
			<description><![CDATA[<p>   
<em> On Tolerance:  </em>
 ? 
<em> A Defence of Moral Independence </em>
  
<br>
 by Frank Furedi  
<br>
  
<em> Continuum, 224 pages, $22.95 </em>
  
</p> <p><em><a href="https://www.firstthings.com/article/2012/01/libertarian-limits">Continue Reading </a> &raquo;</em></p>]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Squaring the Circle</title>
			<guid>https://www.firstthings.com/article/2011/02/squaring-the-circle</guid>
			<link>https://www.firstthings.com/article/2011/02/squaring-the-circle</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
			
			<description><![CDATA[<p>  
<em> The Conservative Foundations of the Liberal Order:  <br> Defending Democracy Against Its Modern Enemies and Immoderate Friends </em>
  
<br>
 by Daniel J. Mahoney 
<br>
  
<em> ISI, 240 pages, $26.95 </em>
  
</p> <p><em><a href="https://www.firstthings.com/article/2011/02/squaring-the-circle">Continue Reading </a> &raquo;</em></p>]]></description>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
