<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>First Things RSS Feed - Leora Batnitzky</title>
		<link>https://www.firstthings.com/author/leora-batnitzky</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.firstthings.com/rss/author/leora-batnitzky" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description></description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2025 First Things. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
		<managingEditor>ft@firstthings.com (The Editors)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>ft@firstthings.com (The Editors)</webMaster>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:51:35 -0500</pubDate>
		
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<item>
			<title>The Martin Buber Reader: Essential Writings</title>
			<guid>https://www.firstthings.com/article/2003/02/the-martin-buber-reader-essential-writings</guid>
			<link>https://www.firstthings.com/article/2003/02/the-martin-buber-reader-essential-writings</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2003 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
			
			<description><![CDATA[<p> The 1920s and  &rsquo;30s were a time of intense intellectual ferment in Germany. Radical questioning  was the order of the day in every domain of thought, including religion. Take,  for example, the uncompromising de&shy;bate that took place between the young Leo  Strauss and Julius Guttmann, a student of the great neo-Kantian philosopher  Hermann Cohen and author of the formidable  
<em> <a href="https://www.amazon.com/PHILOSOPHIES-JUDAISM-Philosophy-Biblical-Rosenzweig/dp/B0000CM6TH/?tag=firstthings20-20" target="_blank">Philosophy of Judaism</a></em>
(1933).  In his early work of 1935,  
<em> <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Philosophy-Law-Contributions-Understanding-Predecessors/dp/0791419754/?tag=firstthings20-20" target="_blank">Philosophy and Law</a></em>
, Strauss criticized Guttmann&rsquo;s  attempt to understand Jewish philosophy as an aspect of &ldquo;culture&rdquo; rather than  &ldquo;law.&rdquo; For Strauss, Guttmann&rsquo;s attempt to assimilate Jewish thought to culture  showed him to have bought in to questionable liberal presuppositions about the  common cultural roots of philosophy and revelation, which, even at this early  stage of his career, Strauss insisted on keeping sharply distinct from one another.  Against Guttmann&rsquo;s liberal (and liberalizing) view, Strauss contrasted the thought  of medieval Islamic and Jewish philosophers who understood religion neither  as a &ldquo;field of validity,&rdquo; nor as a subjective &ldquo;turn of consciousness,&rdquo; nor,  least of all, as a &ldquo;field of culture.&rdquo; Rather, the medievals never wavered in  grounding religion in divinely ordained  
<em> law </em>
 . 
</p> <p><em><a href="https://www.firstthings.com/article/2003/02/the-martin-buber-reader-essential-writings">Continue Reading </a> &raquo;</em></p>]]></description>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
