<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>First Things RSS Feed - Philippe Bénéton</title>
		<link>https://www.firstthings.com/author/philippe-bnton</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.firstthings.com/rss/author/philippe-bnton" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description></description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2025 First Things. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
		<managingEditor>ft@firstthings.com (The Editors)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>ft@firstthings.com (The Editors)</webMaster>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:51:32 -0500</pubDate>
		
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<item>
			<title> The Languages of the Rights of Man</title>
			<guid>https://www.firstthings.com/article/1993/11/the-languages-of-the-rights-of-man</guid>
			<link>https://www.firstthings.com/article/1993/11/the-languages-of-the-rights-of-man</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 1993 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
			
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Those who once spoke, or who speak, the language of the rights of man make up a most varied group: Jefferson and Mounier, Robespierre and Saint Just; Roosevelt but also Vyshinsky; John Paul II and Ronald Dworkin. Which is to say, this language has been used in a whole assortment of ways. Thus if the notion of the rights of man has become the hallmark of modern ethical theory and liberal politics, it is nevertheless a confused notion. There were, there are, different languages of the rights of man, and these languages must first of all be distinguished one from the another.
</p> <p><em><a href="https://www.firstthings.com/article/1993/11/the-languages-of-the-rights-of-man">Continue Reading </a> &raquo;</em></p>]]></description>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
