<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>First Things RSS Feed - Yale Kamisar</title>
		<link>https://www.firstthings.com/author/yale-kamisar</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.firstthings.com/rss/author/yale-kamisar" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description></description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2025 First Things. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
		<managingEditor>ft@firstthings.com (The Editors)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>ft@firstthings.com (The Editors)</webMaster>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:55:34 -0500</pubDate>
		
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<item>
			<title> &#8220;Right to Die&#8221;&#226;&#128;&#148;Good Slogan, Fuzzy Thinking</title>
			<guid>https://www.firstthings.com/article/1993/12/002-right-to-die-good-slogan-fuzzy-thinking</guid>
			<link>https://www.firstthings.com/article/1993/12/002-right-to-die-good-slogan-fuzzy-thinking</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 1993 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
			
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In recent years we have heard a good deal about the &ldquo;right to die.&rdquo; As my colleague Carl Schneider has observed, Americans tend to think about every social problem in terms of &ldquo;rights,&rdquo; a mode of thinking we find convenient and comfortable. And few rallying cries or slogans have been more appealing and seductive than that of the &ldquo;right to die.&rdquo; Few are also more fuzzy, more misleading, and more misunderstood. The term has been used loosely by many people to embrace at least four different rights:
</p> <p><em><a href="https://www.firstthings.com/article/1993/12/002-right-to-die-good-slogan-fuzzy-thinking">Continue Reading </a> &raquo;</em></p>]]></description>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
