Perichoresis and Patripassianism
by Peter J. LeithartGiven the unity of the Persons of God, all of God suffers for the sake of the world. Continue Reading »
Given the unity of the Persons of God, all of God suffers for the sake of the world. Continue Reading »
Atonement theories, whether built on Old or New Testaments, tend to ignore the narrative context that gives the atonement meaning. Continue Reading »
The Levitical system of sacrifice cannot be wholly explained without penal substitution. But can it be explained without it? Continue Reading »
Religions can be said to “spiritualize” sacrifice only if sacrifice was originally “non-spiritual.” Continue Reading »
Substitution is necessary but not sufficient for a biblical understanding of atonement. Continue Reading »
God reconciles us to Himself. Why would we need reconciliation in the first place? Continue Reading »
Which discourse matters in atonement theology? Continue Reading »
Recent writers have emphasized the communal telos of the atonement: Jesus died to found a community. That disrupts some traditional atonement theories more than has been recognized. Continue Reading »
Classic atonement theories have looked past the gospel narratives in an effort to uncover the underlying substructure, logic or mechanism of atonement.What if the gospel narratives are the atonement theory? What if, instead of God’s offended honor or God’s reputation for just rule, we . . . . Continue Reading »
Over many decades and in voluminous writings, René Girard has elaborated a theory of sacrifice, scapegoating, and violence that purports to unveil things hidden from the foundations of the world. He has become a guru, not least to Christian theologians eager to formulate non-violent versions of . . . . Continue Reading »
Subscribe
Latest Issue
Support First Things