Heidegger on Correspondence

As Inwood explains, Heidegger doubts that a correspondence theory of truth is coherent. Truth for him is “disclosure” rather than correspondence. Why? If truth is correspondence, then an assertion is true if it corresponds to the facts of the case. Heidegger raises questions about both . . . . Continue Reading »

Beyond epistemology

Michael Inwood’s Heidegger: A Very Short Introduction is superb. It is, as the title indicates, very short. It is, however, thorough; and it is, unlike its subject, completely lucid. Inwood has the English knack of making Heidegger’s most abstruse concepts seem perfectly down-to-earth. . . . . Continue Reading »

Foundations

Intellectually and politically, Christianity is a stability. We have a foundation. But Christianity also has a high tolerance for instability, uncertainty, imperfection, incompletion. The reason is that our foundation is that our foundation is not below us, set in the past; rather, our foundation . . . . Continue Reading »

Constituting Mind

Steven Crowell ( A Companion to Phenomenology and Existentialism (Blackwell Companions to Philosophy) ) gives this helpful explanation of what Husserl means when he says, counter-intuitively, that objects are “constituted” by the mind: “he means neither that the mind composes a . . . . Continue Reading »

Deleting the Ego

Why, Leszel Kolakowski ( Husserl Search For Certitude ) wants to know, do philosophers talke about “Ego” when they mean the person, the self, or the soul? He thinks it’s a trick of language: You can’t say that the Ego is the philosopher, a real “I,” since for . . . . Continue Reading »

What is Phenomenology For?

In his contribution to A Companion to Phenomenology and Existentialism (Blackwell Companions to Philosophy) , Steven Crowell summarizes the aims of phenomonology: it is “descriptive” rather than “constructive”; it aims at “clarification, not explanation”; it is . . . . Continue Reading »

Transcendental

In his German Idealism: The Struggle against Subjectivism, 1781-1801 (p. 138-9), Frederick Beiser offers this lucid explanation of “the transcendental” in Kant: “Rather than reducing experience down to the level of individual consciousness, the critical philosophy makes both the . . . . Continue Reading »

Cartesian Moses

According to Dermot Moran’s account ( Introduction to Phenomenology ), Husserl’s phenomenology was an effort to arrest “cultural fragmentation and relativism, brought about by deep uncertainties about the nature and project of reason in the twentieth century. Husserl saw himself . . . . Continue Reading »

Perichoretic imagination

Gadamer waxing (Hegelian and) perichoretic (quoted in Gadamer’s Hermeneutics: A Reading of Truth and Method , p. 159): “Life is defined by the fact that what is alive differentiates itself from the world in which in which it lives and to which it is bound, and preserves itself in such . . . . Continue Reading »

Coherence of history

As Weinsheimer ( Gadamer’s Hermeneutics: A Reading of Truth and Method , p. 150) explains, Dilthey like every other theorist of historical hermeneutics is haunted by the Hegelian ghost he tries to escape. For Dilthey, the problem is to prove the coherence and unity of history. He points to . . . . Continue Reading »