Burying Barronelle Stutzman
by Steven D. SmithThe Court has declined to review Arlene’s Flowers despite hopes that the Trump-appointed justices would spur the Court to take on lingering First-Amendment questions. Continue Reading »
The Court has declined to review Arlene’s Flowers despite hopes that the Trump-appointed justices would spur the Court to take on lingering First-Amendment questions. Continue Reading »
The Supreme Court's decision not to hear Grimm leaves untouched bad law concerning transgender rights. Continue Reading »
Roe must go. It is morally and, more to the point for the Court, constitutionally indefensible—and has been from the moment it was handed down. Continue Reading »
Fulton is a victory f0r religious liberty, but, given the fact-specific nature of the case, it might not be as concrete or influential as some might hope. Continue Reading »
Fulton is, we should hope, a reminder that religious freedom is foundational and that it need not and should not be only a partisan concern. Continue Reading »
My commitment to God and to the truth of a book I believe to be his holy Word is the defining premise of my life, the focus of my faith, and the guiding directive for my actions. Continue Reading »
The Supreme Court will hear the case that could overturn Roe and Casey. Continue Reading »
The Court’s inaction this term on an abortion case from Mississippi strongly suggests that fewer than four justices are prepared to overrule Roe. Continue Reading »
Meriwether is a sign that there are still a handful of influential people who are not prepared to abandon reality just yet. Continue Reading »
I spent the first thirty years of my adult life fighting racial injustice in America. I was a community activist in Boston in the sixties, I spent time in jail in North Carolina in 1963, and I walked across that Selma bridge with Dr. King in 1965. I was the Massachusetts state official responsible . . . . Continue Reading »