Not A Constitutional Crisis
by John MurdockWe have no “constitutional crisis.” We have no “normative crisis.” One could, however, make the case that we have a “credibility crisis.” Continue Reading »
We have no “constitutional crisis.” We have no “normative crisis.” One could, however, make the case that we have a “credibility crisis.” Continue Reading »
Amy Coney Barrett has not had her soul shaped by the places and people governed by the dominant liberal ethos of our age. Continue Reading »
The warmth and compassion that Judge Barrett has shown me on so many occasions flow from the same wellspring of faith for which she is now so excoriated. Continue Reading »
America evaluates judicial nominees under three criteria—legal credentials, judicial philosophy, and personal character—and Barrett passes each criterion with flying colors. Continue Reading »
With the official right to abolish our human nature inscribed in law in Bostock, we have all become slaves of our own “freedom.” Continue Reading »
The Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, which incorporates sexual orientation and gender identity into Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, is a victory for gay rights advocates and entrenches gender ideology into civil rights law. Many are asking about its implications . . . . Continue Reading »
The contemporary crisis of Western civilization is fundamentally a crisis in the idea of the human person. Continue Reading »
Bostock struck at the very root of the law in denying the necessary way in which human beings by nature must be constituted. Continue Reading »
This Term, both progressives and the traditionally religious can claim victories in the debate over sexuality, gender, and equality. Continue Reading »
Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru and Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania might have profound implications for religious freedom in the years ahead. Continue Reading »