Theres hardly a more disquieting and grotesque topic than pedophilia, but, as Mary Eberstadt reveals in her essay on pedophilia chic , it has not always been given the condemnation it deserves, evenas it werein America.
Present unanimous disapproval comes from the political right and leftso much so that in the thick of the Polanski scandal, The New York Times and the Washington Post . . . untrue to form, found themselves editorializing about the case in phrases that the Washington Times or the Catholic League could have reprinted verbatim. Interestingly, both conservatives and liberals arrive at their condemnation of pedophilia through moral reasoningthough liberals, on nearly every other matter of sexual morality, allow only pragmatic considerations in public discussion.
But as late as the 1990s, this unanimity could hardly have been predicted, as a sizable cadre of enlightened folk were still wondering whether intergenerational sex . . . might be worth a cheer or two. Perhaps current disgust for this attitude is motivated by guilt, as the enlightened view of child abuse was entertained by more than a few opinion-machines of the likes of The Nation , New Republic , Vanity Fair , and the American Psychological Association.
Interestingly, Eberstadt identifies this decades abuse scandal among priestsor, perhaps, the coverage of itas a watershed moment for our attitude towards the vice. Not only did the scandals do away with all vestiges of benignity pedophilia retained, but they made the public acutely aware of the lasting harm sexual abuse causes. And while the scandals gave professed enemies of the Church a motive for claiming a moral high ground, the Churchs harshest critics are, generally speaking, the same sort of enlightened folks from whom pedophilia chic had floated up. So the libertine view of pedophilia chic and hating on the Church were no longer compatible.
While the problem of pedophilia has not gone away, we can take consolation in Eberstadts assurance that this grave wrong remains a marker of right and wrong in a world where other markers have been erased.
We launched the First Things 2023 Year-End Campaign to keep articles like the one you just read free of charge to everyone.
Measured in dollars and cents, this doesn't make sense. But consider who is able to read First Things: pastors and priests, college students and professors, young professionals and families. Last year, we had more than three million unique readers on firstthings.com.
Informing and inspiring these people is why First Things doesn't only think in terms of dollars and cents. And it's why we urgently need your year-end support.
Will you give today?