Last month, Alan Potash, the Midwestern regional director of the ADL, wrote the Omaha World-Herald to declare that “freedom of speech does not extend to racist groups.”
As Eugene Volokh points out, this is particularly dangerous for a Jewish organization to hold, given the decades-long willingness of leftists to name Israel a racist state. Beyond that, however, it is yet another marker of what appears a growing willingness to place some people beyond the pale of Free Speech protections. Note that Potash didn’t just say that racist speech ought to be banned, bad as that would be; he said that certain people ought to have their speech-rights removed.
We’ve seen this kind of thing building in the kangaroo courts of the Canadian human-rights commissions, and I am growing more and more worried about its application to those who dissenters on same-sex marriage. The media’s dominant metaphor of racism surely puts this in play. Does Alan Potash really want to see what will happen to Orthodox Jews when freedom of speech is removed from disfavored groups?




July 1st, 2009 | 10:42 am
On thecatholicthing.com website, a U. N. document entitled “Yogyakarta Principles” was recently discussed. This document seeks to add to “long standing human rights treaties” a category described as “gender identity and sexual orientation”. If successful this program would deny freedom of speech to individuals and divest parents of the freedom to educate their children. The piece is worth reading especially because it seems too horrible to be true but, at least according to the writer, is.
July 1st, 2009 | 10:45 am
[...] Consequences of policy. [...]
July 1st, 2009 | 10:47 am
[...] Consequences of policy. [...]
July 6th, 2009 | 2:40 pm
THIS IS A WEBSITE THAT DEALS WITH RACISM USING FREEDOM OF SPEECH:
http://www.bullies2buddies.com/How-to-Stop-Racism
July 6th, 2009 | 6:47 pm
[...] NO FREEDOM of Speech for “Racists?” …. [...]
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact