If you expect Jesus to return within the next forty years, does that make you an optimist or a pessimist?
The Pew Research Center recently released a survey about what events Americans believe will unfold in the next forty years. One interesting question asked about the return of Jesus Christ:
As expected, predictions about whether Jesus Christ will return to earth in the next 40 years divide along religious lines. Fully 58% of white evangelical Christians say Jesus Christ will definitely or probably return to earth in this period, by far the highest percentage in any religious group. Only about a third of Catholics (32%), and even fewer white mainline Protestants (27%) and the religiously unaffiliated (20%) predict Jesus Christ’s return to earth.
In addition, those with no college experience (59%) are much more likely than those with some college experience (35%) and college graduates (19%) to expect Jesus Christ’s return. By region, those in the South (52%) are the most likely to predict a Second Coming by 2050.
The Washington Examiner sifted through the data and discovered that 26 percent of Democrats and 19 percent of Republicans believe that the Second Coming “will definitely” happen within the next four decades. Among those who think Jesus will probably return to earth in forty years, there are more GOPers (24 percent) than Democrats (18 percent) that believe this will happen. While these results won’t surprise evangelicals in the South—who recognize that theological views cross party lines—it will probably come as a shock to many Northern secularists that Democrats can be as “Christianist” as Republicans.
But what does it mean? How does this fit into the overall views of Christians in America?
Not surprisingly, there are few areas of Christian theology more contentious or confusing than eschatology, the study of the end times. Should the Book of Revelation be interpreted literally or metphorically? Will Christ establish his Kingdom on earth or has his millenial reign already begun? While I don’t know how much overlap there is with other Christian traditions, within evangelicalism there are four general points of agreement and four general perspectives on eschatology.
The four points of agreement are:
1. Jesus Christ will physically return to earth one day.
2. There will be a bodily resurrection of all people who have ever lived.
3. Satan will be defeated and constrained forever.
4. There will be a final judgment in which believers join Christ for eternity while nonbelievers are separated from God’s presence.*
How this occurs, though, is an issue of great debate. One of the central issues involves the millennium, the thousand-year period during which Christ is said to rule the world. (Revelation 20:1-10). The four most popular views in evangelicalism are dispensational premillenialism, historical premillenialism, amillenialism, and postmillennialism.
Dispensational premillenialism is the view that Jesus will return to remove the church from the world in an event known as the rapture. Theories differ on whether the rapture will occur before, in the middle of, or after a seven year period called the tribulation (pre-trib, mid-trib, post-trib). These events will culminate in a literal thousand year rulership of Christ when peace will reign, the natural world will no longer be cursed, and evil will be suppressed. A final rebellion, however, will break out which will end in God crushing evil forever, judging the resurrected, and establishing heaven and hell.
The following beliefs are features of dispensational premillenialism:
Well-known proponents of this view include: Dallas Theological Seminary, Tim LaHaye (author of the Left Behind series), and Pat Robertson.
Historical premillenialism is the belief that Christ will return “before the millennium” in order to resurrect the saints (the “first resurrection”), establish his rule from Jerusalem over the rebellious nations (the battle of Armageddon), and usher in a thousand year period of material peace and prosperity; at the end of this period the nations (still in unresurrected, natural bodies) will rebel and make war against Christ and the resurrected saints (the battle of Gog and Magog), who will be saved by fire from heaven, followed by the second resurrection—now of unbelievers—and the final judgment
The following are features of historic premillennialism:
Well-known proponents include the late theologian George Eldon Ladd, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, and the early church fathers (e.g., Ireneaus, Polycarp, Justin Martyr).
Amillenialism is the belief that the millennial kingdom is indeterminate in length and fulfilled by Christ currently ruling in heaven. At the end of this reign Christ will come back to gather the church and judge the nations.
The following are features of amillennialism:
^Some amils are preterists, believing that many of the prophecies (including the one about the antichrist) have already been fulfilled (usually around a.d. 70).
Well-known proponents of this view include Augustine, Martin Luther, and John Calvin.
Postmillenialism is the belief that Christ’s second coming will follow the millennium, which will itself be ushered in by the spiritual and moral influence of Christian preaching and teaching in the world.
The following are features of postmillennialism:
At this point there are two types of postmillennialists. Pietistic postmillennialists deny that the postmillennial advance of the kingdom involves the total transformation of culture through the application of biblical law. Theonomic postmillennialists (e.g., Christian Reconstructionists) affirm this.
An extended period of great spiritual prosperity may endure for millennia, after which history will come to an end by the personal, visible, bodily return of Christ accompanied by a literal resurrection and a general judgment, which ushers in the final and eternal form of the kingdom.
Postmillennialism was popular during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries and is still popular with many mainline denominations. Few evangelicals, however, hold this view of eschatology.
One last group that could be included is “panmillenialists”—folks who simply believe “whatever happens, it will all pan out in the end.”
(In case your curious about my own view: Like many Southern evangelicals, I assumed for many years that dispensational premillenialism was the historic biblical position. But now I’m an amillenialist who subscribes to partial preterism (e.g., I believe that Nero was the antichrist that St. John was referring to).)
* Boyd and Eddy, Across the Spectrum
**All points listed as features are from R.C. Sproul, The Last Days According to Jesus





July 22nd, 2010 | 12:26 pm
Just wanted to pop in and say that, as an atheist, this was a really really helpful clarification for me.
July 22nd, 2010 | 1:26 pm
Would it be too harsh to say that the publication of the Scofield Bible was one of the worst things ever to happen to evangelicalism?
July 22nd, 2010 | 1:42 pm
Criag: maybe a little too harsh. Those old Bible teachers – John Nelson Darby, George Muller, C.I. Scofield, William Kelly, Harry Ironside – were men of deep faith and irenic spirit. They just happened to be wrong about eschatology. Unfortunately, sola scriptura taken to its (logical?) extremes.
July 22nd, 2010 | 2:50 pm
Joe Carter: This is a very helpful summation. Thank you.
TomG: How is it that the errors of four men warrant such a gratuitous swipe at Sola Scriptura? Do you think Sola Scriptura depends on four human beings?
Thanks to all.
Peace.
July 22nd, 2010 | 3:20 pm
Interesting statistics. But here’s where many seem to get the meaning of the word “eschatology” wrong, so wrong that when a fellow PhD Theology student asked me my interest and I replied, “eschatology,” he remarked, “So you want to know when Jesus will return?” Eschatology is not just about the “last things.” Here’s a helpful distinction:
“I distinguish three different ways of using the term eschatology, each of them related to a specific grammatical form of the Greek word eschatos. Ta eschata, the neuter plural, ‘the last things,’ refers to those questions that traditionally are dealt with at the end of Christian dogmatics, such as death, resurrection, judgment, and new creation. Eschatology in this sense deals with the future, the grand finale of life, world, and cosmos. It is about the chronologically last things. To eschaton, the neuter singular, turns the interest away from chronological last things to existential ultimate things. It is about the ‘last’ in the sense of the deepest meaning of everything. Paul Tillich, who introduced this shift, spoke of the eschaton as the ‘transcendent meaning of events’ (1963, 67). This would mean that every event carries an eschatological deep dimension of ultimate meaning. We can call this the existential understanding of eschatology. The third variant, ho eschatos, the masculine singular, refers to Jesus Christ — especially the Jesus who announces ‘The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God has come near; repent and believe in the good news’ (Mark 1:15 NRSV) and of whom Paul says ‘when the fullness of time had come, God sent his Son, born of woman, born under the law’ (Galatians 4:4 NRSV).” — Antje Jackelén, “A Relativistic Eschatology: Time, Eternity, and Eschatology in Light of the Physics of Relativity,” Zygon 41, no. 4 (Dec. 2006): 957-958.
So how would the statistics change if people were asked about the transcendent, deepest, eschatological meaning of everything?
July 22nd, 2010 | 3:40 pm
Two of my favorite quotes:
Without millenarian hope, the Christian ethic of resistance and the consistent discipleship of Christ lose their most powerful motivation. — Jürgen Moltmann, The Coming of God (Fortress, 1996), 201.
The challenge to the contemporary church is to formulate the Christian hope in a way which (with the postmillennial tradition) promotes responsible and hopeful activity, but (with the premillennial tradition) avoids the dangerous utopianism of believing that humanity can design and build the kingdom of God itself. — Richard Bauckham, “Millennarianism,” Dictionary of Ethics, Theology and Society, ed. Clarke and Linzey (Routledge, 6), 568.
July 23rd, 2010 | 9:09 am
Consider that the ages follow the Feasts of the LORD. the spring feast have been fulfilled. it is the summer for bringing gentiles to the gospel. the fall feasts are soon to be fulfilled. let us be ready, watching to see what our Messiah does.
July 23rd, 2010 | 1:28 pm
C.I. Scofield was the huckster who abandoned his wife and children (refusing to support them), even taking their money…
http://poweredbychrist.com/files/cyrus/scofield.htm
July 23rd, 2010 | 5:35 pm
Joe Carter: “Christianist.” Isn’t that an Andrew-Sullivanist term?
July 23rd, 2010 | 9:58 pm
“Christianist.” Isn’t that an Andrew-Sullivanist term?
Yes, it is. And its a word I despise.
August 4th, 2010 | 2:03 am
Jewish Wedding & the Rapture
If you believe in this connection, Google “End Times Passover blog of August 2.” As you know, many prophecy teachers see connections between the stages of a Hebrew Wedding and the Rapture many are looking for. The above blog has a great in-depth discussion that everyone who is expecting an imminent rapture will enjoy reading! And please tell many others of the same blog. Maranatha!
(observed the above while webbing – Clare)
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact