At Christianity Today we often speak of the summer months as the “church report season,” as many denominations hold their annual meeting or conference during this time of the year. The two words most often used to describe mainline Protestantism in North America are “crisis” and “decline,” both of which seem justified in light of recent trends.
The recent article by Ross Douthat in the New York Times, “Can Liberal Christianity be Saved?” offers an insightful analysis of the Episcopal Church in the United States of America (ECUSA) whose House of Bishops last week approved an official liturgy to bless same-sex unions. This is the same communion which counts among its great champions of the past the likes of Thomas Cranmer, John Wesley, and William Wilberforce, and of which George Washington was a member. Meanwhile, the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America (PCUSA) very narrowly turned back a proposal to redefine marriage. The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (TEC) has already adopted what is euphemistically called a “more inclusive” policy in sexual ethics. This has resulted in denominational fracturing and the emergence of several distinct Lutheran renewal groups. Similar struggles have long been present in the United Methodist Church. But this church body which holds one significant advantage over other mainline denominations: the UMC General Conference allows voting members from outside North America. Largely with the support of African delegates, the UMC defeated the latest effort to “reform” (i.e. abandon) its historic commitment to biblical standards. There are flashes of light amidst the shadows.
What are evangelicals to make of these developments? Here are three lessons.
1. There is an intrinsic connection between spiritual vitality and theological integrity. The debate over homosexual practices within the mainline denominations is not the root cause but only the presenting issue in the devolution Ross Douthat has described so well. At the heart of this issue is a broken doctrine of biblical authority, a loss of confidence in the primary documents of the Christian faith. The patina of pietism, and the lushness of a well-rehearsed liturgy, are no substitute for what the Thirty-nine Articles calls “the sufficiency of the Holy Scriptures.” Apart from such commitment, it will not be long before other cardinal tenets of the Christian faith become negotiable, including the Trinity, the full deity and true humanity of Jesus Christ, and redemption wrought through the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross. Two of Chuck Colson’s most important books were titled, The Body, a study of ecclesiology, and The Faith, a call for renewed orthodoxy. The church and the Bible are coinherent realities in the economy of grace. One will not long survive intact without the other.
2. The continuing saga and approaching collapse of mainline denominations should prompt us to pray. Within each of the mainline denominations, there are many faithful believers who have not “bowed the knee to Baal.” Often they face harassment, discrimination, and litigation. Pray that they will remain faithful in the face of such assaults, and pray that they will find communities of love and support in what for many will be an increasingly isolated position. Some impatient evangelicals on the outside may be tempted to say, “Well, why don’t you just leave?” But breaking with the church in which one has been nurtured in the faith, often from childhood, can be like abandoning one’s mother. Like marriage, according to the Book of Common Prayer, such a decision should not be made unadvisedly or lightly, but reverently, deliberately, and in the fear of God.
The words of the apostle Paul are surely pertinent here: “Let everyone be persuaded in his own conscience.” But while we pray for those who remain as faithful witnesses swimming against the tide, we should also lift to the Lord in our prayers those who have responded to the Spirit’s leading to establish new communities of faith and ecclesial alignments. There is no place for self-righteousness on either side of this divide. However much ecumenical advance we have made, Protestants of all kinds remain divided from the Roman Catholic Church, the most glaring evidence for which is the lack of a common table to share the Sacrament of Unity. Going back even further, Catholics of the West have been separated from Orthodox believers in the East since the Great Schism of 1054. In the meantime, let us renew our commitment to the quest for Christian unity, even as we find ways to celebrate what Tom Oden called twenty-five years ago, “The New Ecumenism.” In all of this we seek to bear witness to God’s love and grace in this fragile world.
3. Evangelicals have no room to boast or gloat over the “sickness unto death” in the mainlines. The Roman Catholic Church and the Southern Baptist Convention are the two largest denominations in North America. Significantly, both groups have resisted pressures for theological accommodation in recent decades. But both face stresses and conflicts of their own, including some of the same temptations that beset mainline Protestants a generation ago. Among progressive Roman Catholics and some evangelicals today the temptation is to imitate the fading ethos of liberal Protestantism, in reaction to “authoritarian” dogma, “conservative” politics, or both. In both cases, the motive is often apologetic if not evangelistic: to win over religion’s “cultured despisers” to a kind of vague neo-spirituality. While the intention may be worthy, the results are likely to be disastrous: a social Gospel that is all social and no Gospel; a church which has nothing to say that secular elites have not already said, and usually said better; a horizontal faith with a penchant for the instantaneous and the disconnected but with no confidence in the overarching storyline of God’s redemptive love from creation to consummation. The trajectory from Friedrich Schleiermacher to John Shelby Spong is a well-worn path. As Peter Berger once said, “He who sups with the devil had better have a long spoon.”
Timothy George is the founding dean of Beeson Divinity School of Samford University and the general editor of the Reformation Commentary on Scripture.




July 18th, 2012 | 8:26 am
I once saw an article written by a theologian from a mainline church who wrote, “The Bible should be taken seriously.” That was it! Take the Bible seriously. Once you’ve done that, you can preach and teach whatever you want. You can change Biblical admonitions and creedal statements, so long as you assert that you have taken what the scriptures “seriously.”
July 18th, 2012 | 9:29 am
And yet we are told that, if the Church would just loosen up or even jettison this or that old and stuffy (if not evil) doctrine, all sorts of moderners, post-moderns, gays, unmarried couples, blended families, singles, countless varieties of minorities, test tube children, “undocumented workers”, golfers, Sunday-morning-lay-around-in-bed drinking coffee New York Times readers, and university professors would flock to the pews–vastly expanding our numbers and outreach. That change never lives up to these promises only means that some other “old, stuffy doctrine” must come under the cross-hairs–then watch’em break down the doors!
July 18th, 2012 | 10:33 am
I believe it is the question of authority that is central. The Reformers repudiated the authority of the teaching church, in the name of fidelity to scripture. That belief in the inspiration of scripture rested on the teaching of the Church and nothing else, they contrived to overlook. Will anyone seriously maintain it to be self-evident that the Epistle of Jude is inspired and the Epistle of Barnabas is not? It is not surprising that Semler, Ernesti and others should attack the inspiration of scripture, in the name of private judgment. The wonder is that it took so long.
A church founded on its rejection of authority can never hope to impose its authority on its own members. Why should the Thirty-Nine Articles or the Westminster Confession have more authority than the canons of the ancient councils?
July 18th, 2012 | 12:35 pm
[...] Three Lessons from the Decline of Mainstream Protestantism – Timothy George, First Things/First Thoughts [...]
July 18th, 2012 | 3:40 pm
Michael PS has it right.
The issue of authority will determine how the different ecclesial bodies will weather the sociopolitical storms that are challenging the very foundations of Christianity.
Since Holy Scripture requires an authoritative interpreter, protestant communities have no hope of defending the authority of Scripture because they lack the Magisterium protected by the Holy Spirit.
Adaptation to a worldly agenda is inevitable when Scripture is subjected to an eisegesis that merely mirrors a contemporary will to licentiousness, permissiveness and hyper-individualism.
Furthermore, the inane action of submitting doctrine to a vote in these relativism soaked times, as is the common practice in mainline protestant communities, has proven to result in ecclesial suicide.
Protestant pentecostal communities will fare no better since their praxis is hardly different from the mainliners. They naively think that the fundamentalist (bibliolatry) fist they have jammed into the leaking levee will protect them from disintegration. The fact that the Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada, for example, have caved on divorce and remarriage confirms that they are already digging sand out from underneath the berm to prop up the top of their teetering doctrinal tower of Babel.
July 18th, 2012 | 7:00 pm
[...] decline of liberal Christianity, and Diana Butler Bass’s response. Over at First Thoughts, Timothy George weighs in with an evangelical pespective on Douthat’s essay. What are evangelicals to make of [...]
July 20th, 2012 | 9:10 pm
Yes, those that call themselves Evangelical (and even Roman Catholic) should not be gleeful at the collapse of the mainline denominations because we are next. They may be farther down the path to perdition, but we are on the same trail. Our congregations are no less corrupt and worldly. We offer your best life now, health and wealth, a therapeutic Jesus, or a moralistic Jesus. God’s Word is little read nor given its rightful place of authority. We tell them that God has a wonderful plan for their lives, rather than take up your cross. We do have our god, but he is more of our creation. Indeed, we think that the liberals are in bad shape because they are hemorrhaging members and money. Yet, what profit do we have we have rich congregations full of goats and tares?
July 21st, 2012 | 8:55 am
[...] and other progressive bloggers explained it. (One more post on this topic I’d recommend: Timothy George’s, which offers three important lessons for [...]
July 21st, 2012 | 11:58 am
A few miles from where I live in downtown Royal Oak, is St. David’s Episcopal Church; built during the late 50s, early 60s building boom. There is plastic sign suspended over the old one declaring it is now the Community Evangelical Church. The other day I saw a group of young black, brown and white kids working on the lawn supervised by an elderly Chinese man. Then it hit me. There will never be another new Episcopal or Anglican church built in North America again. Ever. In a recent WSJ House of Worship column, the author claims membership in the US is now below one million. And the ECUSA headquarters in Manhattan on Second Avenue (I used to shop its religious bookstore when I worked at Image Books/Doubleday) is now for sale. Including its large penthouse apartment housing the presiding bishop. It’ll fetch a nice penny even in this market. A bishop wrote the Journal countering the facts of the piece except he didn’t actually list any specific corrections. Only repeated folksy anecdotes of social justice and outreach to the Other. The Other is all those individuals and families who quietly drifted away or, as I did, became Catholics.
July 22nd, 2012 | 12:05 am
[...] Read More [...]
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact