A few years ago, Secondhand Smokette and I were in Europe. We interacted with people who, it would be fair to say, are part of the intelligentsia and political ruling classes. They hated President Bush, which did not surprise us. But the cause of their loathing did: It wasn’t Iraq, as we thought. It was his rejection of Kyoto and global warming hysteria. The people with whom we discussed this really thought a crisis was upon us–and blamed Bush for keeping the world from the solution.
My how times change. Germany–a hotbed of hysteria–seems to have turned against the panic. From the story:
Germans are losing their fear of climate change, according to a survey, with just 42 percent worried about global warming. It seems the long and chilly winter has taken its toll on climate change sensibilities despite the fact that weather has nothing to do with climate. The latest figure is a clear drop from the 62 percent of Germans who said they were scared of such changes just last autumn.
The new survey, carried out by polling company Infratest for Der Spiegel magazine, showed a quarter of those questioned thought Germany would profit from climate change rather than be badly affected by it. Many people have little faith in the information and prognosis of climate researchers with a third questioned in the survey not giving them much credence. This is thought to be largely due to mistakes and exaggerations recently discovered in a report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, the IPCC.
Or to put it another way, fool me once, shame on you–but fool me twice, shame on me.
Jokes aside, I see this as a healthy change. For the last several years, the world has been pounded by the hysterics–led by Al Gore and the IPCC–with panic stories of Himalayan glaciers melting in 30 years, dire predictions of dead polar bears (even though they are not declining), and swamped coastal cities by the end of the century. It was always overblown, toward the goal of scaring people into giving up their freedom and turning the world’s economies over to international bureaucrats and a self selected scientocracy.
But people are no longer fooled. It is like seeing how a magician does his tricks. Once you know, the old hoodoo can never be recreated. The hysteria almost worked. But I don’t see it building up again. And now we have a chance for a more reasoned approach to the entire field.
March 28th, 2010 | 11:34 pm
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Vince Humphreys and Wesley J. Smith, Biggus Swordus. Biggus Swordus said: RT @CO2HOG: SHS: Global Warming Hysteria: Germans Losing Faith in Global Warming http://bit.ly/doaahl #tcot [...]
March 29th, 2010 | 12:18 am
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by CO2HOG: SHS: Global Warming Hysteria: Germans Losing Faith in Global Warming http://bit.ly/doaahl #tcot…
March 29th, 2010 | 9:17 am
What does this subject have to do with “ethics”?
Wesley J. Smith Reply:
March 29th, 2010 at 2:06 pm
Fair question, History Writer. I decided to get into the global warming issue because of the pronounced anti humanism engaged in by some of the hysterics. Also, some among the alarmists express ideology pretending to be science, a tactic we also discuss here. In that sense, global warming hysteria corrupts science, undermining trust in the method, which I think is an ethical issue. Finally, it’s my blog and it interests me.
March 29th, 2010 | 12:14 pm
What is this mentioned “reasoned approach”? Does it exist?
I read Mitt Romney’s “book” last night (it’s a joke, should have come with crayons, don’t worry – I saved the reciept). Given that it appears he is trying to set himself up as the Republican frontrunner in 2012 by being the pro Wall Street candidate, let’s assume he will represent political opposition to the ‘hysterics’ of the liberal/democratic persuasion. He does not present a clear, concise, data-driven framework to begin correctly tackling global warming over the next 50 years. His ideas were riddled with scientific flaws and do not address the underlying issue of carbon usage.
I have yet to see a clear, data-driven, realistic, reasoned approach from Republicans that addresses the reality of global warming in a manner that will work.
[BTW, Kyoto has been around for YEARS and no democrat is signing on - very few scientists think it will work, either; I don't support Kyoto]
Can someone point out a Republican plan that will work? I can’t find one.
http://www.nature.com/climate/2010/1003/full/climate.2010.19.html
Wesley J. Smith Reply:
March 29th, 2010 at 1:59 pm
David: Your snottiness is boorish. Romney is a very successful businessman, saved the Utah Olympics, was governor of MA, and has become a national political figure. What have you ever done? Don’t answer. It doesn’t matter. As usual, you are being irrelevant. Moreover, this isn’t a partisan blog site. Republican plans or lack thereof, are also irrelevant. What the post is about is the hysteria is failing–even in Europe. And that’s a good thing.
March 29th, 2010 | 12:19 pm
clarification, a few democrats have mentioned support for Kyoto; by signing on, I mean an honest, Rick Santorum-esk effort to get back on it – not just lip service.
March 29th, 2010 | 3:40 pm
Thanks, Wesley. Since it’s your blog, does that mean we can expect you to continue pandering to Republicans and conservatives under the same false flag?
Wesley J. Smith Reply:
March 29th, 2010 at 3:44 pm
I reject the characterization.
March 29th, 2010 | 7:43 pm
It’s not a characterization. It’s reality.
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact