Ads


A Story of Exile

My youngest sister, Katie, was expelled from a women’s Bible study program because her stubborn two-year-old refused to stay in the nursery. After her banishment she shared with me her sense of exile in the land of motherhood.

The evangelical church that Katie attends consistently shows a low tolerance for children, and I do not think that attitude is out of the ordinary. Parents whose young children vocalize during the service are pounced on by ushers and asked to leave—that is, if they haven’t already been redirected to the church nursery before even entering the sanctuary. Katie is the mother of five adopted children, aged ten, nine, six, four, and two. With the arrival of the eldest, she left a promising career in business to nurture and homeschool her brood. She often has pushed back at her church’s anti-child policies, bringing the youngest children with her into the service despite the open disapproval. This has not simply been an act of recalcitrance. Katie and her husband have had real concerns about the less-than-charitable treatment their mixed-race children have received in the nursery, and the medical status of some of their children has made leaving them in the care of strangers difficult.

Katie sought out the opportunity to join the church’s Bible study group because she had gone for many years without taking time to nurture her spiritual growth. She viewed these meetings as a chance, finally, to do something for herself. The program meets on a weekday and provides age-leveled activities for the children whose mothers attend. Unfortunately, when Katie’s two-year-old refused to stay in the nursery, the nursery volunteers did not consider distracting a fussy tot to be part of the deal. As soon as the child began to cry, she was brought to Katie in the Bible study. There she quieted down and played happily by herself on the floor next to her mother. She even received compliments from a grandmother in the group: “Your little girl is such a sweetheart,” and “She’s so well-behaved.” The leader of the Bible study did not concur, however, and asked Katie to stop coming. Having a mother and small child in the group just wasn’t “the kind of atmosphere we are seeking to cultivate,” she explained.

Not wishing to be a nuisance, Katie retreated. But what kind of atmosphere should a Bible study group for women seek to cultivate, if not one that recognizes the loneliness and craving for adult interaction that many stay-at-home mothers experience? If she cannot participate in a Bible study specifically designed for full-time mothers, where can she go to find some much-needed fellowship? It appears that the exile that began for Katie with the arrival of her first child will not end until her youngest reaches the age of reason.

The culture in which we live today is not particularly child-friendly, despite appearances to the contrary. Almost everyone loves a well-dressed, well-behaved child, but understanding of the truly difficult and unavoidable aspects of child rearing is scarce. Furthermore, the narcissistic self-indulgence of parents who are unwilling to properly discipline their children is not true child friendliness. Sadly, many churches seem to mirror this culture. “You decided to have this family,” the reasoning goes; “deal with it.” In this matter, though, our churches must stand out as truly different from mainstream culture, especially in the face of the many disturbing cultural forces that threaten the nuclear family.

What does a child-tolerant church look like? First, the church —and all of us, really—must remember that where there are women, there are children. Today, with the widespread use of birth control and the prevalence of abortion services, the bittersweet burden of motherhood is no longer seen in the wider culture as a normal phase of life, but rather as a lifestyle option. As a result, many people don’t wish to be inconvenienced by children, who are seen as someone else’s “choice,” not the collective responsibility of (in this case) the church community. At an infant dedication ceremony, the entire congregation enters into a covenant with the parents to help raise the child to love and serve the Lord. That is what I remember hearing as a child, as I sat with my parents through many a long church service.

In a child-tolerant church, families with small, squirmy children are truly welcomed, not separated and exiled. An infant’s vocalizing, a dropped toy, the movement of a restless child in a pew—all are viewed with tolerance, if not sympathy. Parents whose small children start to scream get up and take them to the cry room or the church foyer. The few moments of noise as a child is carried out are endured by the congregation and politely ignored. No one enjoys the disruption, of course, but all are mindful of having been in the same position or, at least, that all are called to “suffer little children to come unto me.”

Over time, children can learn to sit quietly in church and entertain themselves—or perhaps even listen with reverence and respect. I need not remind readers that these capacities are in short supply among young people today. And let us not underestimate the ability of young children to benefit from grown-up church. My earliest conversion experience came when—at the age of five, sitting restlessly next to my mother with a coloring book and the occasional candy bribe to keep me quiet—I heard the pastor say that if I wanted to live in heaven with Jesus, he needed to live in my heart. This caught my attention. The pastor then explained that I only needed to invite Jesus into my heart for him to be there. “Oh,” I thought, “I can do that right now.” So I did, and no adult was necessary to help me realize that the Lord had done something special for me that day.

A child-tolerant church also knows that families committed to full-time parenting desperately need support and understanding. Women (and men) who spend their days with small children need some time to recharge and listen to the Lord. If they are expected to (and they may indeed wish to) leave the nursing infant and the clinging toddler in the nursery, the church needs to remember that soothing and entertaining these children is also a ministry. If this is too difficult for the nursery volunteers, then mothers (and fathers) who keep their children with them should be welcome in meetings and at services.

I have been a Catholic for seven years. As the mother of one young child, I frequently join the parents who occupy the last rows of pews in church, close to the exits. Children are welcome at Mass—in the cry room if they are screaming, but in the pews even if they aren’t perfectly still. Not all Catholic churches are like this. I lived for a while in a parish where the beautiful old church did not have a nursery or a cry room. Parents with active little ones occasionally used the small Reconciliation room as a cry room, until someone started locking the door. The congregation was predominantly older, past child-rearing years, and most of the families with young children got the message. They moved to the neighboring parish that hosted the local Catholic school and that also offered a more child-friendly environment.

I have seen many evangelical church services in central Africa and other parts of the non-Western world during which toddlers occasionally roam the aisles or even wander up to the pulpit before being scooped up by a parent or older sibling. Infants who start to cry are quickly carried outside. These small disruptions are scarcely noticed. I wonder, sadly, how churches in North American seem to have strayed so far from the fundamental recognition that children are a special gift from God and our collective responsibility. During his earthly life, Christ made it abundantly clear that he does not consider small children a nuisance. The sanctity of the worship service is not diminished by their presence. In fact, without them, the Body of Christ is not complete.

When we are old, let’s hope that our grown-up children don’t conclude that caring for the elderly is just another lifestyle choice. When I am ninety years old, I might have a tendency to make clicking sounds with my dentures, insist on bringing my old afghan to keep my knees warm, be slightly forgetful, and speak out at the wrong moments in the service. I hope, however, that I still will be welcome in church and not exiled to the chapel of a senior center or nursing home. I fear though, that the children of today who grow up with so little experience of the weekly gatherings of the church community (including Bible study) with all their human noise and inconvenience, will see no reason why they should tolerate the presence of the vulnerable elderly any more than they should tolerate the presence of the very young.

Beth Lewis Samuelson, Ph.D., is an assistant professor in the Department of Literacy, Culture, and Language Education at the W.W. Wright School of Education at Indiana University, Bloomington.

Comments:

2.10.2010 | 6:53am
Jeff says:
The snide, old, dried-up, ex-hippy, left-wing Massachusetts Catholics in the parishes that I attend always sneer down at noisy children. These are the types of Catholics who still sport "Vote for Kerry" bumper stickers on their VWs.
2.10.2010 | 8:02am
cyshouse says:
What a great article! There are too many outstanding observations to select just one to praise.
2.10.2010 | 10:46am
S. Hersey says:
"The culture in which we live today is not particularly child-friendly, despite appearances to the contrary"? You astonish me, Dr. Samuelson; my own daily observations had led me to mistake the modern world, secular and otherwise, for a garish, toy-strewn nursery festering upon the remnants of a civilization.

First, you offer "Almost everyone loves a well-dressed, well-behaved child, but understanding of the truly difficult and unavoidable aspects of child rearing is scarce." Following this: "Furthermore, the narcissistic self-indulgence of parents who are unwilling to properly discipline their children is not true child friendliness." But that first sentence is nothing but the eternal battle-cry of the parents you describe in your second. No parents think that that second sentence could possibly describe THEM, and your article suggests little real-world sympathy or patience for anyone who might muster a real-world objection to such parents' depredations.

I suspect that increasing rates of childlessness might be the result, not of selfishness, but of ordinary, sensible humans whose lifelong experiences with the "child-tolerant" have offered them no evidence that rearing children needn't be hellish, and that the native ignorance and barbarity of one's offspring needn't be indulged, much less embraced and allowed to rule our stores, restaurants, and even churches.

I regret to hear of a relative's difficulties at church, but I’ve also lost all patience for parents who deride as “selfishness” life choices that they themselves have helped to look like mere self-preservation.
2.10.2010 | 10:50am
Dale says:
Please help me remember who it was that said "Suffer the little children to come unto me and forbid them not"!
2.10.2010 | 12:14pm
senex says:
When I was a small child, my parents went to separate masses until I was old enough and learned to behave myself in public. My wife and I did likewise. Today many parents do not want this inconvenience, and as a result their little ‘darling, aka a brat, disrupts the whole congregation with its screeching and unruliness. This reflects the parents’ selfishness and disregard for others in the pews who are there to pray and to listen to the Scriptural readings and the sermon. Today’s parents need to realize that the world is not about them. They need to be considerate of others.
2.10.2010 | 1:22pm
Robberson says:
S. Hershey-There is a song and you might consider it's words i.e. "with a little love in your heart". I, for one, choose "childish" behavior, regardless of relative age anytime and anyplace, to the frustrated outbursts of one who seeks to, but cannot control others or their own personal environment.
2.10.2010 | 1:46pm
Robberson says:
(Forgive me if this has already been posted but I got an error message when sending.)

Now, to S. Hershey-You might consider the words of a well known song "with a little love in your heart". Nice tune but more importantly words to live by.

For me, I will always choose to be in the presence of "childlike" behavior, regardless of relative age, over the frustrated, and yes quite angry, machinations of one who seeks but cannot control others or their own personal environment.

BTW-when our Lord was preaching before the 5,000 (To me, this was church-after all, He was there!!!) I cannot imagine Him telling the unruly children present and their parents to leave or shut-up! Unless you S. Hershey assert in a crowd of 5,000+ there was no childlike behavior, dogs barking and milling about or children just being children.
2.10.2010 | 2:12pm
Robberson says:
Senex-When our Lord was preaching before the 5,000 (To me, this was church-after all, He was there!!!) can you REALLY imagine Jesus telling the unruly children present and/or their parents to leave or shut-up! That is-unless you assert in a crowd of 5,000+ there was/were no childlike behavior, dogs barking and milling about or children just being children. As for me, I'll follow what Jesus expected the assembled to do i.e. use my God-given gift of concentration rather than exclude occasional childlike behavior or a child from His presence!
2.10.2010 | 2:50pm
Artaban says:
I cannot help but view the issue of noisy children in the same way that I view "bad homilies". So many will object to a priest that is an unskilled homilist, in the same way they object to noisy children--and I think we all would agree without question that a good homilist, like a well-behaved congregation, cannot help but enhance one's appreciation of Church.

But let's be very clear to place first things first. Did you come to receive Jesus, or to hear a particular priest? Is not an uninspiring homily an opportunity to exercise Christian virtues, such as patience, humility, FORTITUDE, and charity? I submit that as long as a noisy child is not a constant problem, in such "annoyances" we also have opportunities to grow in the love of Christ.

On the other hand, a child that is not taught (and teaching can take time) respect and self-discipline is also being deprived of their rights as a child of Christ.

As stated by the demons in C.S. Lewis' "Screwtape Letters", If one parishioner, child, or priest is sufficient to come between you and your Lord, how little indeed is your faith.
2.10.2010 | 2:59pm
My dear Robberson, you've no cause for resentment towards me--the modern world has been virtually engineered to suit you! Pace Dr. Samuelson, I can't think of a public place with the remotest inclination or will to curb or discourage any imaginable manifestation of "kids being kids" (would any pre-Dr. Spock parent find that euphemism comprehensible, or thought it desirable if so?).

And rest easy: I certainly don't pretend to be able to control my environment, or to have the power of imposing civilized behavior on others who think it inauthentic or unfair to impose on a child. No one who values civilized behavior really does, and perhaps that's what rankles most about this article's laments over "exile": there's such a thing as being a sore winner, and it's graceless of someone who holds the cultural whip-hand to find ways of asserting that the culture is essentially intolerant of her and hers.
2.10.2010 | 3:25pm
Robberson says:
Artaban-Perfect! I should have "held back" as your post said it so much better than my scribblings!
2.10.2010 | 3:29pm
Ginny says:
Churches certainly should be tolerant and loving to children. But if someone has
2.10.2010 | 6:14pm
Neil says:
There is a time and place for everything. As a dad of small children, I have observed that some people enjoy children, and some people simply don't. (I void the latter.) In my church experience, it has been a mixed bag. Churches that embrace children not only are following our Lord's teaching, but also ensuring bright futures for them.
2.10.2010 | 8:02pm
Maxim says:
The condition of modern children is not a natural condition; it is a condition created by generations of State-sponsored ignorance of what it takes to raise obedient children, in direct contradiction of the traditions of healthy families and communities in the past. This creates a circumstance in which there are no good answers, as parents need to be involved in communal activities, while the hellish uproar their off-spring creates renders such activities impossible in their presence. It is still possible to find in modernity groups of people who are generally able to control their children, such as the Amish, but they usually live beyond the purview of the Psychobabblers. I very much doubt that Jesus was addressing a crowd of people who were unable to control their children, as there has rarely been a People in all of Time and Space as willing as we to let the tail wag the dog in this respect.
2.10.2010 | 8:09pm
Maxim says:
This is a test, as my last comment disappeared when I tried to submit it, and I want to make sure the system works before I retype it.
2.10.2010 | 8:59pm
sophia says:
This is a good article. I especially am glad that she has noted the reality that many mothers have to accept the end of their liturgical life after baby arrives. If you're a good Christian and have lots of kids, that puts you out for many, many years. Eventually you may find a friendly parish--but if you don't...and sometimes even if you do...what a long sojourn in the desert. That is one aspect of the cross of parenthood that seldom gets mentioned.

On the second issue, welcoming children: that's right, folks, you should just put up with the noise. Lord have mercy on the nasty old ladies--or anyone-- who indulge in exclusion of children and dirty looks to parents who venture to worship with them. Don't they realize they are looking at the future of the faith? They should be helping out not criticizing. And for those who think every parent should either manage the child to silence or never bring them, please remember the flip side: it's often a legitimate concern that if you do discipline your child for misbehaving, someone will criticize you for that, too--or worse--go on a tear about abuse or God knows what.

It certainly is possible to have well-behaved young children...but if someone doesn't...they need kindness and support, not condemnation and criticism.

Thanks for writing this article, and tell your sister to try and start a bible study that meets at a park with a fence. If she's in an area with good weather empty tennis courts work great.
2.10.2010 | 10:56pm
Bernadette says:
Allow children to be in church with or without the cry room. A quote I keep with me often while I take my two kids around, "I rejoice to be little, because only children and those who are like them will be admitted to the heavenly banquet." Saint Therese Of the Child Jesus

"A young mother at a papal audience once asked another woman to hold her crying baby while she approached Pope Pius XII. She returned a moment later, saying: 'Let me have him. His Holiness says he doesn't care if the baby does cry.'"--From Rychlak, "Righteous Gentiles" p. 190
2.11.2010 | 9:21am
sanpietrini says:
Give me a church – and Mass – with kids any day. I have attended Mass in many churches in my travels, and I find those parishes with little kids to be the most vibrant and welcoming. After all, a parish that excludes one group, probably excludes others; and since none of us is getting any younger….

As to needing silence to worship, I don’t depend on one hour on Sunday to fulfill that need.
2.11.2010 | 12:28pm
cyhouse says:
I think one of the author's most important points is that what presents itself as a society that is concerned for children - our society - really is not. The proliferation of institutions and activities for children - daycare centers, "camp" programs, and so on - exist to serve the needs not of children but of adults, adults who wanted to "have" children but do not want to be around their children.

Here are a few examples of situations that are often brought up by the child-detesting. Children are disruptive in restaurants; however, the children are not there because they want to be, or because it's a suitable environment for them. They are there because their parents wanted to eat out, instead of preparing meals at home. Children do not take themselves to theaters to see movies obviously not suited for them; parents take them there, because the parents want to see the movie but do not want to employ a babysitter or wait for the movie to be available for home-viewing.

Children are not undisciplined because that is the best thing for them. They are undisciplined if their parents are not willing to make the effort to teach and enforce correct behavior. Children are not materially overindulged because it is the best thing for them, but because it suits a purpose for their parents.

A society in which most adults who spend time with children are paid to do so is not one that is welcoming to children. And (to mention a pet peeve) neither is a society in which *Christian Homeschooling Conferences* exclude children!
2.18.2010 | 1:34pm
OUr Church has sound proof rooms off to the left and right of the chapel for parents to go when they cry or just get too roudy. I hated it at first but now I LOVE it because I can actually still hear what is going on and what the priest has to say.
2.18.2010 | 7:38pm
G says:
At an infant dedication ceremony

Is that what they call baptism now???
2.20.2010 | 11:57pm
Brenda says:
no, that is what congregations that don't believe in infant BAPTISM call it...
2.21.2010 | 12:01pm
If children are not allowed to be in church for worship, then just how, exactly, are they expected to learn HOW to worship? If a child is being truly disruptive due to loud, ceaseless crying, then by all means take him/her out so that the baby can be comforted without sensing Mom's growing anxiety level. But if a child is just being a happy child, making the appropriate noises and behaving, then that's exactly where the child belongs.

If the child never hears the Lord's Prayer, the Creeds, or the Liturgy being spoken, how will s/he learn them? Granted the parents should teach them, but it's just not the same as repeating them week after week with your brothers and sisters in Christ.
3.4.2010 | 11:32pm
At the point our culture and courts decided it was ok to vacuum babies out of their mother's wombs, we ceased to become child friendly. With almost all denominations accepting of birth control and even 95% of Catholics using artificial birth control, is it any wonder children are not welcomed?

Actually we can learn something from the Mormons. Children are all in the pews. It is what is expected.
4.16.2010 | 2:36pm
Anna says:
As a believer in infant baptism, it is my firm belief that worship belongs to the family, not just the individual. Throughout history, the christian God has dealt with families and included all ages in his dealings. There is no reason at all to believe that simply because our culture has become individualistic that God has done so too. Therefore, as a matter of theology, not just personal preference (which honestly, might leave my children in a nursery and me taking a typical selfish "break" from their care), I try my best to keep my sometimes noisy or disruptive children in worship with me.

I can think of no better way to "forbid" the little children than to forbid their presence in the corporate worship of God. What's more, aren't we to "turn and become like children", not they like us?
4.17.2010 | 2:24pm
There is a difference between the infant noises and a crying, talking 6-24 month old. Consider when you are juggling an infant on your lap the person in the pew in front of you is only about 18 inches from this child mouth. How do you expect that person to hear the pastor. A child you can reason with 2 years plus, is teachable. Before that, they don't want to be there anymore than anyone else wants them there. We currently have a child in our services, who is not removed with excessive loud crying and noises. That is all everyone is thinking about. Should one inconsiderate parent disrupt the worship of 500 other people? Yes, I have two children. I wouldn't have considered forcing my children on the congregation. However when they got to be 3 plus they joined us in the evening services to learn how to behave in church. They are now men and complaining about the screaming kid in church that is not removed.
If everyone would show consideration for others, this wouldn't be an issue.
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact