Ads




The Moral Consequences of Episcopal Sin

[Editor’s Note: The following is an adaptation of a homily delivered on Divine Mercy Sunday, 11 April 2010 at St. Alphonsus Church in Chicago.]

A preacher is often faced with the burdensome task of confronting the discrepancy between the texts from Scripture assigned for the day and the headlines that have been blaring during the past week. For example, how does one reconcile the news of God’s love with the news of the earthquake in Haiti?

Something like the same dilemma faces me today, when I must preach on this verse from today’s first reading, where we just heard: “The apostles performed many miraculous signs and wonders among the people. They used to meet in Solomon’s Portico. No one dared join them, even though they were esteemed by the people” (Acts 5: 12-13).

Such a situation hardly obtains today, where the successors of the apostles are neither feared nor esteemed. I presume you have all heard the news or read the headlines about the revelations of sexual abuse of minors by priests which have recently come to light in Ireland, Germany, and elsewhere, and which are so reminiscent of the revelations of similar crimes committed by American priests that came to light in the Long Lent of 2002.

Given how devastating must be the effect of these crimes on the victims, I cannot help but be struck—as has been the world—by the collusion of bishops in covering up these crimes, lest they cause “scandal to the Church.” Even now, explicit confessions of guilt in that sin have been remarkably muted. At least, those expressions of remorse come tinged with both embarrassment and defensiveness. All too rarely does one hear the ringing tones of, for example, Buti Tlhagale, the Archbishop of Johannesburg, South Africa, who had this to say during his homily at the Chrism Mass last week on April 6, 2010:


In our times we have betrayed the very Gospel we preach. The Good News we claim to announce sounds so hollow, so devoid of any meaning when matched with our much publicized negative moral behavior. Many who looked up to priests as their model feel betrayed, ashamed and disappointed. They feel that some priests have “slipped away from the footprints of the Apostles.” Trust has been compromised. The halo has been tilted, if not broken. What happens in Ireland or in Germany or America affects us all. It simply means that the misbehavior of priests in Africa has not been exposed to the same glare of the media as in other parts of the world. We must therefore take responsibility for the hurt, the scandals, the pain and the suffering caused by ourselves who claim to be models of good behavior. The image of the Catholic Church is virtually in ruins because of the bad behavior of its priests, wolves wearing sheep's skin, preying on unsuspecting victims, inflicting irreparable harm, and continuing to do so with impunity. We are slowly but surely bent on destroying the church of God by undermining and tearing apart the faith of lay believers. …

The upshot of this sorry state of affairs is that we weaken the authoritative voice of the church. As church leaders, we become incapable of criticizing the corrupt and immoral behavior of the members of our respective communities. We become hesitant to criticize the greed and malpractices of our civic authorities. We are paralyzed and automatically become reluctant to guide young people in the many moral dilemmas they face.

Under such circumstances, when allegations after allegations are made, when scandal after scandal is brought forth, as clergy, we probably feel much closer to Judas Iscariot and his thirty pieces of silver. “Alas for that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed” (Mk. 14.21). Or perhaps like Simon Peter, we are deeply buried in denial; we curse and swear when we hear the words: “You are one of them.” We answer: “I do not know the man you speak of.” Each time we toss our vows in the air, each time we break our fidelity, we betray Christ himself.

I have long felt that we Catholics will know that this crisis has finally been put behind us, at least in the United States, when the bishops, in one of their collective annual meetings, passes a resolution actually thanking those newspapers who revealed the slime and filth lurking inside the presbyterate of too many dioceses and the attempted cover-ups by too many chanceries. Please understand: I am not naïve about the secular media. But if the Hebrew prophets could see the hand of God at work in the attacks on ancient Israel from the Assyrian empire, then Catholics ought to be able to espy the workings of divine providence when the media bring to light crimes that should have been made public from the beginning.

I am of course referring to the revelations of the Long Lent of 2002. Recent reports by the U.S. media rehearsing those same and other American stories of the distant past in the wake of truly new revelations in Ireland and Germany, all in an effort to try to bring Pope Benedict down, are a different matter. But to explain this second wave of reports for what it is—fundamentally an anti-Catholic campaign—requires that we first recognize some fundamental rules for discerning spirits.

I am a Jesuit trained in rules for discerning spirits first formulated by our founder, St. Ignatius Loyola, which he set down in print in his influential Spiritual Exercises. Two of them are of particular relevance: one, which touches on the sin of the hierarchical Church; and the second, on the attacks on the Church that come from without her precincts. Here is how the first one reads:


Our enemy may be compared in his manner of acting to a false lover. He seeks to remain hidden and does not want to be discovered. If such a lover speaks with evil intention to the daughter of a good father, or to the wife of a good husband, and seeks to seduce them, he wants his words and solicitations kept secret. He is greatly displeased if his evil suggestions and depraved intentions are revealed by the daughter to her father, or by the wife to her husband. Then he readily sees he will not succeed in what he has begun. In the same way, when the enemy of our human nature tempts a just soul with his wiles and seductions he earnestly desires that they be received secretly and be kept secret. But if one manifests them to a confessor, or to some other spiritual person who understands his deceits and malicious designs, the evil one is very much vexed. For he knows that he cannot succeed in his evil undertaking, once his evident deceits have been revealed.

Here stand exposed all the attempts to hush up heinous crimes under the pretext that one was preventing “scandal,” when in fact one was, however unawares and unintentionally, colluding in the very secrecy that made these crimes go undetected and unpunished for so long.

For that sin, the Church is now paying a heavy price, and deservedly so. But the revelations of these crimes, both of commission and of collusion, have also unleashed, particularly lately, another campaign of vilification against the Church against which you, as lay Catholics, must now be made aware. And for discerning the spirit behind that campaign, I offer these further observations from the Spiritual Exercises:


The conduct of our enemy may also be compared to the tactics of a leader intent upon seizing and plundering a position he desires. A commander and leader of an army will encamp, explore the fortifications and defenses of the stronghold, and attack at the weakest point. In the same way, the enemy of our human nature investigates from every side all our virtues, theological, cardinal, and moral. Where he finds the defenses of eternal salvation weakest and most deficient, there he attacks and tries to take us by storm.

To be overly schematic about this, for the most part the revelations that came to light in 2002 were salutary. So too, mostly, are those that have recently come to light in the past few weeks about the crimes that took place, however long ago, in Ireland and Germany, precisely because they are only now coming to light. But at this juncture, at least in the United States, one cannot help but notice that the stories coming out now about US crimes deal exclusively with events that took place even back as far as the 1950s. And there’s a reason for that. For not only must the Church face the crimes and sins that have taken place inside her folds. But precisely because they came to light under the glare of a secular press often hostile to the very mission of the Church, she must now face a whole new arsenal of weapons being aimed at her very existence. And where she is weakest, there will she be attacked the strongest.

One of John Henry Newman’s Parochial and Plain Sermons was called “The Moral Consequences of Single Sins,” in which he preached on a verse from the Old Testament: “Be sure your sin will find you out” (Numbers 32:23), and on which he had this to say:


Day and night follow each other not more surely than punishment comes upon sin. Whether the sin is great or little, momentary or habitual, willful or through infirmity, its own peculiar punishment seems, according to the law of nature, to follow—as far as our experience of that law carries us—sooner or later, lighter or heavier, as the case may be.

That law is now being visited upon the Church as a whole, but our prayer must be that the operation of this divinely instituted law lead not to her weakening but to her strengthening, and precisely because it leads to her purification.

Edward T. Oakes, S.J. teaches theology at the University of St. Mary of the Lake, the seminary for the Archdiocese of Chicago.

Bookmark and Share

Comments:

4.15.2010 | 5:44am
DNB says:
Fr Oakes.
Thank the news media? You have to be kidding. To pursue your Ignatian analysis, this would be thanking the devil for his help. Exposure is one thing, unrelenting unbalanced reporting is another, especially in the interest of discrediting the moral authority of the Church, the only institution with moral clout that stands against sexual deviance. How about a little comparative analysis of the percentage of cases in other churches, schools, and medical facilities. What about the statute of limitations, violations of the rules of discovery, false accusations, one time offenders, etc., etc. What about the responsibility of the media in supporting "sexual freedom" and creating an atmosphere of license? This stuff will be with us forever because such sins will recur, and the "news" will go on and on. Ah, the selective outrage! It’s touching to see all this media concern about “the children.” But not to worry. After contraception, abortion, homosexuality, and gay marriage, our tolerant liberals, anti-Catholics and the NYT will gradually come to approve of pedophilia.
Here’s a little comparative context from an article by Thomas Plante is a Professor and Chair of Psychology and Director of the Spirituality and Health Insitute at Santa Clara University as well as a Clinical Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University School of Medicine.
First, the available research (which is quite good now) suggests that approximately 4% of priests during the past half century (and mostly in the 1960s and 1970s) have had a sexual experience with a minor (i.e., anyone under the age of 18). However, it appears that this 4% figure is consistent with male clergy from other religious traditions and is significantly lower than the general adult male population that is best estimated to be closer to 8%.
Second, 80% of all priests who in fact abuse minors have sexually engaged with adolescent boys not prepubescent children.
Third, quality research suggests that half of the clergy sex offenders in the Catholic Church had one victim. Almost all the cases coming to light today are cases from 30 and 40 years ago. We did not know much about pedophilia and sexual abuse in general back then. In fact, the vast majority of the research on sexual abuse of minors didn't emerge until the early 1980's. So, it appeared reasonable at the time to treat these men and then return them to their priestly duties. In hindsight, this was a tragic mistake.
It has been estimated that 40 years ago about 23% of male psychotherapists have been sexually involved with their clients.
4.15.2010 | 6:40am
Gil Costello says:
Father Oakes is a priest I have always admired, for he is a priest who abides in Christ. I would hope that he, with his gift of intellectual discernment, will find a way to answer the question why lay formation has not yet begun anywhere at any parish. I am convinced that it is because bishops and pastors have consistently succumbed to the temptations of what can be called "the secular good". A pursuit of holiness for them would be an embarrassment. That hasn't changed since the scandal.

Right off the cuff I can think of five saintly persons at my parish who have been ostracized because of their holiness. THIS is the problem the Catholic Church is faced with, not unlike the 20 centuries that preceded the 21st. The Society of Jesus has birthed many saints, including Avery Cardinal Dulles and Hans Urs von Balthasar in our time, but it is no secret that the lives of these exceptional priests will not undo how the Society has been tainted by "the secular good".

I'm waiting in these final days of my life to see a sign of an actual beginning of lay formation, something that can only come from priests, priests who have yet to be inspired by their faith, not politics.
4.15.2010 | 7:04am
Ars Artium says:
My inability to respond effectively to questions about this matter has been a source of suffering. This sermon imposes needed order on my somewhat incoherent thoughts and emotions. It will allow me to provide confident replies to hostile queries - together with confidence that I will not be understood by those who do not possess a theological frame of reference. That will be part of the heavy cost which will be borne by all who are members of the Body of Christ
4.15.2010 | 7:11am
sd says:
Hey! Str. Alphonsus is my parish!
4.15.2010 | 7:43am
Mr Costello, What do you mean by lay formation? Adult religious education? Training to help prevent sexual abuse of children? Something else? In my parish, the first two are common. In addition, we have devotional groups for the Rosary, the Divine Mercy, and, less often than I would like, Eucharistic Adoration. We have numerous people who carry the Host to the sick and house bound. I live in Massachusetts where the Globe led the first round of scandal reporting in 2002. What am I missing? Perhaps the phenomenon you speak of is more localized than you think?
4.15.2010 | 7:44am
hayesms says:
Thank you so much for this post. "He that hath ears to hear, let him hear."

And for those priests and bishops (and Popes?) who are responsible for committing, covering up, and/or otherwise failing to prevent these sins and "grave errors"?

Let those who deserve it be defrocked. Require the rest to repent in sackcloth and ashes. Literally. Require them to wear sackcloth and ashes every Friday in public for a year. Or five. Or however long the victims of the abuse demand. That won't make it right. But it will mean something in this age of cheap talk show confessions and soulless institutional paper apologies.
4.15.2010 | 7:53am
Sean says:
Good call, Fr. Oakes. Thank the media indeed.
4.15.2010 | 9:49am
Gil Costello says:
Mr. Melendez – Adult religious education, training to help prevent sexual abuse of children, devotional groups, Eucharistic Adoration, visiting the sick and house bound: all of these prayerful actions are paths to holiness, but they do not constitute lay formation. They are examples of ministries.

Lay formation involves a pastor preparing lay persons to go out into the world and evangelize by guiding all parishioners into a life of holiness in communing with the Holy Spirit as the Body of Christ in an assembly. Most priests fear assemblies because they fear the Holy Spirit. I have yet to discover a single parish that has a true assembly life.
4.15.2010 | 10:21am
Gil Costello says:
Sean - Aren't we Catholics much better off? What tools God used or allowed to awaken us Catholics in the 21st Century should not be the issue. We know the liberal media is out to destroy the Church (the NYT , espoused as the most professional reporting in America, would not be guilty of so much distortion if this weren't so).

We know that sexual abuse of children by educators in the secular realm is 100 times more prevalent than what occurred in the Church, and most of those educators are still being protected. But would we want to be a part of that dynamic as Church? No, it is a blessing that the media reported the abuses in the Church: it gives us true hope for the future. As I see it, the deeper we go into our humility, not our anger, the more we will be able to discern that there is no place for us to go now in our shame but to Christ. It's like when the thousands of people who witnessed the miracle of the loaves and fishes were prepared to lift Jesus up and take him into Jerusalem and declare him King. They were ready to die for this. But when Jesus told them they would have to eat his flesh and drink his blood, they ran away. Even the disciples wanted to run away, and when Jesus asked them why they didn’t run, they responded, "We have nowhere to go" That's how it is now for us Catholics. We have nowhere to go but Christ. And this is a great blessing at the beginning of this new century.
4.15.2010 | 12:12pm
Bob G says:
A very wise article by Fr. Oakes.

We all know that a secular society experiences a good deal more difficulty than the Church in controlling its sexual impulses. As Mary Eberstadt pointed out, even man-boy love was gaining traction until these Church sexual abuses were uncovered, putting a damper on the fun for a while. I predict that these weaknesses in the secular order soon will begin to manifest their effects, making the homosexual (not pedophile) priest-predators look almost benign by comparison. Let's hope the Church can get its house in order in time to deal with THAT.
4.15.2010 | 12:53pm
jm says:
Superb homily.

Jesus was irked by nothing more than hypocrites and poseurs. Jesus loved honest-to-goodness sinners. Own your sin, repent, strive to to better, and place your soul in God's mercy. The media, including their own hypocrites and poseurs, have done a very good job as pointing out hypocrites and poseurs in our church. I am glad. We must own it.

Heck, the papacy is descended from a thrice-admitted liar/denier, who was the worst possible friend and support at a difficult time. Yet, Jesus chose this sinner as the head of his church, and Peter rose to the challenge. (I'd have chosen John, but I'm not Jesus. And on tax day today,)

It's easy to blame the media. We must be honest, though, take responsibility for what we have done and what we have failed to do, and move forward, renewed in the spirit.

(Good St. Matthew, help me on tax day to get a good refund, etc.)
4.15.2010 | 5:10pm
Yes, and Satan torments us for our sins, but I'm damned if I'm going to thank him for it.

Richard Moorton
4.16.2010 | 8:45am
DNB says:
Guys. Peggy Noonan has a great idea in the WSJ, a wonderful solution. Get younger men amd women into key positions! WOW! Why has no one thought of this?
But I think I have a better idea. Get rid of the sinners in the Church and keep only the perfect. The only downside is that we would have no news, but then everything has its downside. I think Peggy will love it!
4.16.2010 | 9:40am
John Cummins says:
"To pursue your Ignatian analysis, this would be thanking the devil for his help."

Yes, that type of message, although unnecessary, would be a valid adjunct to the testimonies of
- Job, who, with the devil's help was able to say, "I had heard of you [God], now I see you, and repent of myself",

- Joseph, who said to his brothers, "you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good"

- and Paul, "We do not want you to be uninformed, brothers, about the hardships we suffered in the province of Asia. We were under great pressure, far beyond our ability to endure, so that we despaired even of life. 9Indeed, in our hearts we felt the sentence of death. But this happened that we might not rely on ourselves but on God, who raises the dead".

The devil is not the point, God's salvation is.
4.16.2010 | 9:44am
John Cummins says:
"the available research (which is quite good now) suggests that approximately 4% of priests during the past half century (and mostly in the 1960s and 1970s) have had a sexual experience with a minor (i.e., anyone under the age of 18). However, it appears that this 4% figure is consistent with male clergy from other religious traditions and is significantly lower than the general adult male population that is best estimated to be closer to 8%.
Second, 80% of all priests who in fact abuse minors have sexually engaged with adolescent boys not prepubescent children.
Third, quality research suggests that half of the clergy sex offenders in the Catholic Church had one victim. Almost all the cases coming to light today are cases from 30 and 40 years ago."

Comparisons aren't central to the issue of a church that's intended by God to be, ultimately, "without spot or blemish", DNB.
4.16.2010 | 10:54am
Roughcoat says:
Well, I'm really angry with the Church and this time I'm not in forgiving mood. I'm fed up with the whole abusive-priest merry-go-round. I'm tired of people not acknowledging the presence of the elephant in the room, namely the problem of having homosexual priests. On, wait, you don't think this is a problem? You don't think pedophilia is mostly about same-sex (i.e., homosexual) relations between an adult priest and a minor boy? What do you think that Catholic men in the trenches (otherwise known as pews) think about this? Wake up and smell the coffee, gang.
4.16.2010 | 11:36am
Lee Cerling says:
Fr. Oakes speaks wisely.

We are called to love our enemies. I am not Catholic, but it is plain to anyone that the Catholic Church has enemies both within its walls and without. The secular press has made itself the enemy of the Church. But I am reminded of this wonderful prayer for enemies of St. Nicolai of Zica:

Bless my enemies, O Lord.
Even I bless them and do not curse them.

Enemies have driven me into Thy embrace more than friends have.

Friends have bound me to earth; enemies have loosed me from earth and have demolished all my aspirations in the world.

Enemies have made me a stranger in worldly realms and an extraneous inhabitant of the world.

Just as a hunted animal finds safer shelter than an unhunted animal does, so have I, persecuted by enemies, found the safest sanctuary, having ensconsed myself beneath Thy tabernacle, where neither friends nor enemies can slay my soul.

Amen.
4.16.2010 | 12:20pm
Fr. Oaks has it right. This is the best treatment I have read.
4.17.2010 | 1:54pm
Fr. Oakes has a properly hard view of the episcopacy on this issue, though I far prefer George Weigel's more balanced view, including the following from a recent Ethics and Public Policy Center article:

"The sexual abuse of the young is a global plague. Portraying the Catholic Church as its epicenter is malicious and false. 40-60% of sexual abuse takes place within families. There were 290,000 reported cases of abuse in public schools in 1991-2000. There were six credible cases of sexual abuse reported in the Catholic Church in the United States in 2009: six, in a Church of some 65,000,000 members. Having learned the lessons of 2002, the Catholic Church in America today is likely the safest environment for children in the country. No institution working with the young -- not the public schools, not the teachers unions, not the Scouts -- has done as much to face its past failures in this area and to put in place policies to prevent such horrors in the future.

...The Pope's March 20 letter to the Irish Church made clear that Joseph Ratzinger is determined to clean out what he once described as "filth" in the Church, and determined to bring the Curia along with him in that cleansing. That there is filth to be cleaned up is not in doubt; much of that filth is decades old. There is no credible evidence, however, that the Catholic Church is at the center of the global sexual abuse crisis. Honest journalists will recognize that. So will serious Catholics."

Serious Catholics need to recognize the "filth" of the some 4% of the sodomite priests that broke their sacred vows, though we, also, need to respect the some 96% of the priests who kept their vows. The Church needs to be penitent on the issue, though it need not flagellate itself. When Benedict came to my area, Boston, he met with victims of priestly abuse and made a quite heartfelt apology to them.

The reality is that outfits like the New York Times and the Boston Globe are presently involved in smearing the Catholic Church in order to promote their secular liberal fundamentalist agenda.
4.17.2010 | 9:07pm
The profoundly sad central issue is the purposeful, organized, institutional cover up of abusive priests by the highest echelon of catholic leadership. The abuse cases are symptomatic of this institutional rot. The worldwide catholic church leadership operated like a kind of mafia. A number of well regarded lawyers have written that many of these cases meet all the criteria of RICO laws. These are laws used to prosecute mobsters, drug lords, and sex traffickers, criminal organizations that operate interstate and worldwide. Clergy who were raping youngsters under the protective shield of the catholic church, transferred to new dioceses, even out of the country to escape the law. Responsible leaders like Cardinal Law were gotten out of the country. These bishops and cardinals are not being persecuted but rightly prosecuted. The Biblical analogy of the Assyrians and the Babylonians is an apt one. This protection of the priest at all costs has been an ingrained part of catholic culture. Loyalty gone very bad. The same system has been at work protecting alcoholic and drug addicted priests and nuns, priests who fathered children, etc. I've traveled and seen the cute little girls who work in priest's residence in poor Third World Countries. I thought many times that something was very wrong. The huge settlements that are bankrupting dioceses are the fruit of this criminal behavior. Monies and properties accrued over centuries through the sacrificial giving of the saints are being used to pay for clergy misdeeds instead of the work of the church.

Perhaps most discouraging aspect of this is the refusal of the previous Pope, John Paul, and now the current Pope, Benedict, to take any genuine responsibility for these problems. Benedict recently washed his hands of the mess in Ireland, noting that it's the Bishop's fault, he's "only the Pope," (my words). I don't buy for a second that Pope John Paul or Pope Benedict couldn't have effectively acted on the abuse problem. When John Paul visited Central and South America and encountered liberation theology, he knew exactly what to do. He acted immediately, de-funding errant institutions, firing leadership, and banning priests from holding political office. The abuse scandal falls squarely at the feet of the Pope.

I've read many articles on this scandal with many Bible quotes, but these words of Jesus are for some reason never quoted, "But he that shall scandalize one of these little ones that believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone should be hanged about his neck, and that he should be drowned in the depth of the sea. " (Matthew 18:6 Douay-Rheims Bible)
4.18.2010 | 8:32pm
Andrew says:
Re ad today's OP-Ed column in today's (Sunday, April18, 2010) New York Times by Nicholas Kristof. Excellent. Amusingly, he took Maureen Dowd's column slot.

AJC
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact