Dwayne Carter Jr.’s release from Rikers Prison in New York may have slipped past many news readers last month. After all, the story didn’t make major headlines but was primarily relegated to entertainment substories or headlines on pop culture website. Dwayne Carter, more popularly known as Lil’ Wayne, finished serving 8 months in federal prison for charges of attempted weapons possession back in 2007. Although many may not express surprise that Wayne’s career involved prison time (after all, he is a gansta rapper), it did contribute to a lengthy discussion that has surfaced repeatedly in my Christian school classroom lately.
The discussion began after my students responded with shock and disbelief to my own musical preferences (which are dominated by Mozart, monks, and medieval polyphony). One student re-assured me that she didn’t believe the rumor of my classical tastes for a second; after all, she added, you’re far too young to like that stuff. Another student was a bit less diplomatic, declaring that my musical tastes are a “disgrace to teenagers” after I mentioned that I began building my classical library during my high school years.
My students turned the tables of surprise on me, though, when I asked each of them to introduce me to one song they deemed worthy of appreciation. I expected Christian rock artists, classic rock ’n’ roll, and possibly some Indy Pop, but I was not prepared for the string of explicit rap artists that hit my desk, including Jay-Z, Kevin Rudolf, and Lil’ Wayne, along with heavy metal songs such as “Raining Blood” by Slayer.
I would be tempted to write this off as a successful class-wide prank to abuse my classically-trained ears and torture my soul, but our class discussions on music revealed a firm belief that the “skill, creativity, and cultural popularity” of this music made it worth listening to. All the students recognized that explicitly sexual, drug addicted rap artists should not be their models in life, but all were equally persuaded that they could listen to and enjoy such music without letting it impact their own lives.
Despite my temptation to condemn such music immediately for its ugly perversity, a moment’s reflection reveals that the issue is much more complex than declaring an entire genre off limits because the lives of its artists aren’t godly, or because many of the songs contain profanity. These standards would call into question a host of art, music, plays, and movies that I have enjoyed immensely. Thus, while I may not enjoy rap music, making the argument that Christians have a moral obligation to set rap music aside demands more than a quick dismissal.
If music is a form of communication it is worth asking what rap artists are trying to say. Of course, even a genre such as rap has different subcategories, and arguments against popular rap stars such as Lil’ Wayne may not apply to every rap song. But I am interested in thinking carefully about the message of the rap stars that my students have idolized. Katie Couric got an answer to this question when she asked Lil’ Wayne what it means to be a gangsta rapper. Lil’ Wayne’s response: “I don't take nothin' from no one. I do what I wanna do. And I'm gonna do that until the day I die."
In other words, at the core of Lil’ Wayne’s music is a message to his listeners to assert themselves, do what they want to, and ignore rules or boundaries. This agrees exactly with what philosophy professor Bill Lawson argued when he wrote that rappers try to show that each person must look after his own interests, and that rap “glamorizes the ‘bad’ guy” who will not be pushed around or told what to do.
Rap pounds this self-promoting, authority denouncing message from every angle. Most obviously, it does so with its subject matter. Sex and drugs pervade the lyrics while violence and anti-cop images fill rap music videos, all urging listeners to revolt against standards of morality and rebel against “tyrannical” authority. Even the most secular moral standard based on “consenting adults” stands in the way of rap’s push for self assertion as rape, degradation of women, and violence to get what I want pervade the lyrics.
Rappers add to this revolt by casting off the laws of language itself. Rap lyrics very literally bastardize the English language by ignoring grammar, pronunciation, or clarity in communication. Thus, rap music promotes a “sing what I want, talk how I want, do what I want” attitude in rejection of standards for right or wrong.
In addition to the lyrics, it is worth remembering that music itself is a means of communication. Music is not a neutral medium that becomes good or bad based on the words that accompany it; music is an art form that creates impressions, communicates to an audience, and presents its listeners with an interpretation of reality.
One doesn’t need to go read dissertations on the reactions of mice in mazes in order to recognize music’s power. Think about the natural reactions of the body to a Braham’s lullaby, a Sousa march, a U2 rock song, or a Lil’ Wayne rap. Although we might be able to curb our natural reactions, the body longs to sit and relax, to march in line, to jump and clap, or to grind and mosh based on the music it hears. Lyrics often become the only litmus test of acceptable music, but music itself impacts both the mind and the body by stirring up emotions in its listeners. Rap music undermines authority as its jolting beat assaults the standards of musical form.
In the long run, streaming such music through our ears and into our minds must eventually impact how we think and act. However, I am aware that many young people listen to such music and do not end up walking out of their house to commit rape or murder. So, is the popular opinion in my classroom correct, that this music is appropriate to listen to as long as we are careful not to let it impact our actions?
If our standard of virtue is built on the likelihood of becoming violent, drug addicted gangsters then this music is probably harmless to many young people. Most of my students will not take this path of immorality regardless of their musical tastes. But if our desire is to live according to biblical principles, this music fails to meet the standard.
God’s desire for His people consists of far more than a mere set of actions they shouldn’t commit or a line in the sand they are not to cross. After generations of watching His people chase after idols, one might think God would be pleased to see his people offering sacrifices on His altars. But Isaiah tells the Israelites that God would rather they not sacrifice at all than sacrifice with their hands while their hearts were far from Him. Thus, our standard of acceptability should not just be whether or not our actions cross the border between right and wrong, but should also rest on whether or not what we watch, listen to, or think about is consistent with God’s calling for our life.
Our Lord commands us to fill our minds with what is pure, lovely, admirable, and virtuous, to take every thought captive to Christ, and to be holy just as he himself is holy. If these commands shape our musical litmus test, we ought to arrive at a very different conclusion about the rap albums our culture calls skillful, creative, or popular. Further, if we consider the message of self-promotion that rap artists claim they are trying to communicate, God’s word again pushes us in the opposite direction.
Christ summons us with such commands as “clothe yourselves with humility” and “consider others’ interests ahead of our own”. It certainly seems paradoxical to desire humility but to enjoy music that undermines self-sacrifice in favor of self-promotion.
In the end, Lil’ Wayne won’t be banned from my iPod because he’s done time in federal prison. Nor am I necessarily concerned that my students who have purchased his explicit album are one step from cop-killing or drug addiction. Instead, I won’t be listening to Lil’ Wayne because I do not want his message to have a repeated hearing in my heart and mind.
I am concerned about the culture of rap music, including the music and the lyrics, because it is fundamentally opposed to the Biblical picture of a Christian life: a life guided by the Spirit, renewed in God’s image, and destined for a glorious future in God’s presence. That’s a calling worth pursuing with every thought, word, note, and rhythm of our lives.
Christopher Walker is a secondary teacher at Veritas Academy in Leola, PA. He lives in Leola with his wife, Kathryn, and 17 month-old daughter, Alana. He attended Hillsdale College (BA in Classics, minor in music) and Westminster Seminary (Master of Arts in Religion).
Comments:
I have been wrestling with this question for awhile actually, because I too take my faith very seriously and agree that the core of rap and the "gangsta rap" persona is truly offensive, and stands in opposition to many facets of the Christian faith. However, I am an avid runner/exerciser and have been for many years. It was just in the past few years that I really began to take my faith seriously, and to realize that the "pump-up" music I have been listening to for all these years is not appropriate music to be listening to as a Christian. I have firmly banned all blatanly offensive songs from my playlists, but every once in awhile I still notice myself singing along to a song with implicit meanings/subliminal messages/etc.
I guess I am wondering what to do in this situation! I almost feel like I need this upbeat rap music to keep myself motivated in my exercise routine. I do not buy into the lyrics, by any means, but still, they are a part of my daily routine. Any thoughts on something I could try subbing in? Or tips in general? I'm curious.
Although I grew up in the Elvis/Fats Domino era, I was also early-on corrupted (as some might think it) by playing serious orchestral music, and confess that most (not all!) popular music rather bores me - and has done all my life. I am lead horn in a local orchestra (Manukau Symphony) and so have some interest in music.
Just interested - is rhythm the most fundamental essence of music?
jj
Theodore Dalrymple explains why the Baroque is superior to Rock
My point is that every musical genre can be used in an ungodly manner, however they were ALL created by God, and can ALL be used for God, here are some examples: Skillet- christian 'heavy' rock with strings, Guvna B-christian rap(grime), Fee christian rock/worship and Lecrae-Christian rap(RnB) to name only a few.
Listen to some of their songs and see that they are all about God and experiences with God, and even if you don't like the style of music, maybe you can recommend these artists to your pupils or at least tell them to look out for the christian artists in their prefered musical genres.
Thanks
God Bless
Duncan
Actually, you do. Assert what you will, but because a particular piece of music moves you and me in a particular way is just as likely because of our common ingrained culture as it is because of 'nature.
I enjoyed reading your thoughtful and honest post very much. Emily, it may be difficult in the beginning to start dissociating yourself from that which is so blatantly offensive, but with God's help, it's all eminently doable.
If I may be so bold as to offer you this advice: stick with Mozart and Shakespeare. These two gentlemen encompass a range of human thought, experience, and emotion that is simply incomparable with the dessicated sound and word of today's "culture". Stick with them, and before long you'll start hearing the difference.
Now, if you like running, try keeping up with the third movement of Mozart's symphony #34 (K.V. 338). Also, following the score on youtube is like a roller-coaster ride - violins and oboes, oboes and violins.
Progressive bands like Dream Theater and Spock's Beard as well as classic prog-rock artists like Rush, Yes, early Genesis and others are great for running.
Also, I really got into running with a site called Podrunner that has frequently updated mixes of electronic music specifically designed for working out. I would never listen to it under other circumstances, but once I lace up my running shoes, it's gold for keeping me going.
Prior to my age ten, my family was Amish, which is an ethnic culture of its own that has roots in the Reformation. This culture has consistently striven to wall itself off from the culture of the general public and to maintain an essentially unchanged way of thinking about how life should be lived. I think this is a model that needs emulation by traditional Christians who want to resist assimilation into the post-modern secularized culture that suffers a continuing loss of moral perspective. Christians must develop their own space apart from the general culture.
Do we discourage students from reading Shakespeare because of this? Should we warn them away from the theatre because some productions don't conform to Christian ideals?
Of course not. What we should be doing is teaching our youth to engage with the culture and transform it, not to ignore it. We recognize what is good in the thing and build from there.
Your suggestion is right - we do need to cultivate our garden, slowly and mindfully, and invite all people to come to it. What we should also be emulating from the Amish, is the practice of humility and modesty in all things. Too much of our global culture, pop and otherwise, is like one perpetual rumspringa - it's no way to live without always being exhausted in mind, spirit, or body.
Thus, your experience is valuable - how do you integrate the Amish ideals and any practices, into your life today?
Dan:
I'm not sure what you're proposing - perhaps you can clarify you reservations regarding Shakespeare a little more.
Beyond the Bard himself, we do not hold the entire genre of theatrical productions in disrepute because some plays, e.g., The Vagina Monologues, present themes that are contrary to Christian thought and morality. We judge each on its own merits.
As another commenter pointed out already, there are musicians who proclaim the Gospel in genres where we might not expect to find it. Let's support this and work to transform our culture. We always keep the "old" and recognize its value and its pre-eminence, but if we don't engage the new, if we stop finding new ways to share the Gospel, then it becomes just an historical artifact, when in reality it holds meaning for all men in all ages.
And Christopher, look at this statement: “In other words, at the core of Lil’ Wayne’s music is a message to his listeners to assert themselves, do what they want to, and ignore rules or boundaries.” But look deeper Lil’s Wayne can sing whatever lyrics he pleases, but his attorneys expect him to follow accounting rules scrupulously, as well as his production companies because if he doesn’t they will take him to court. And Lil’ Wayne himself expects those same courts to uphold laws that enrich him (and his business partners) by making music and videos that ridicule the moral standards which give those rules life. It’s all a con. Lil’ Wayne and his like (and the corporate structures that promote him) are not revolutionaries, they’re all simply hoodlums on the take. And the kids they take from are just rubes.
The problem with this music is that it makes no deep sense. It assumes that its enthusiasts are too stupid to know that they’re being coned. I want to be proved wrong. I’m waiting.
And Nathan Duffy, the “message” of a piece of music is part of its aesthetic value—it can’t be leached out of it. And look, this is 2010, America, and you read First Things blogs. Saying that rap music is all you really know, well, here, now, with what’s available to you, it’s kinda pathetic. You’re young with a life ahead of you. Don’t listen to music. Learn to make it. It’s Christmas. Nathan, buy yourself a keyboard, they’re cheap. And learn to play it. Takes some time, some effort, but do it. Learn to play a two part invention. I dare you.
Oh, and Emily, on the treadmill? Sousa. Or Donner und Blitz, Johann Strauss Jr. Here’s the link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Q_86qyUzRM&feature=related
Word of warning: the Strauss is more fun with a partner
I agree with you, but would add this - it is necessary, even a duty, for the new to learn, master, and sink its roots in the old. Or to say it another way, the new should chase the old first, if it hopes to maximize its chances of being relevant to the future generations. Otherwise, the new risks being relevant only to itself, with each new stumbling into yet another self absorbed cycle - a repeating hermeneutic of discontinuity, if you wish.
Consider a current example - Madonna and Lady Gaga. How many in the younger generations know that one is a spin-off the other, or even know of the former in the first place? And that the whole shtick here is about making fun of healthy femininity?
If the new knew the old, then perhaps they could place this act in its true context - as an honourable mention in the Catalogue aria in Don Giovanni, or perhaps as some of those tavern characters in Shakespeare's plays.
Yes many of you are probably rolling your eyes and laughing in disgust (much as one of my theology classmates once did when I proceeded to quote Jay-Z, Bonhoeffer, Barth, and Kanye in one presentation). Faithful presence in the world often means bringing light into the darkest corners of one's society, and sometimes even means showing the world the longing and truth of Christ hidden in the deepest recesses of their minds (and which often pops up in the weirdest of places). When we do this we stand alongside Paul at Mars Hill speaking of the unknown god, and Clement in Alexandria as he discussed the "pre-evangelical content" of Plato and Aristotle.
"One doesn’t need to go read dissertations on the reactions of mice in mazes in order to recognize music’s power. Think about the natural reactions of the body to a Braham’s lullaby, a Sousa march, a U2 rock song, or a Lil’ Wayne rap. Although we might be able to curb our natural reactions, the body longs to sit and relax, to march in line, to jump and clap, or to grind and mosh based on the music it hears. Lyrics often become the only litmus test of acceptable music, but music itself impacts both the mind and the body by stirring up emotions in its listeners. Rap music undermines authority as its jolting beat assaults the standards of musical form."
I'm completely with you up until the last line of that paragraph. Especially since you take the time earlier in your article to differentiate between the lyrics and the music.
Let's start by looking at the musical components common to the structure of rap music. A common pattern you will hear in rap music is the same basic sound structure repeated every 5 seconds for the duration of a song. To off set this basic repetition other sounds and effects are add on top of that 5 second cycle. These augmentations or even pauses usually last 2 or 3 cycles and then the song returns to the basic 5 second cycle. One other feature that is almost always included in rap music is a heavy bass beat. Nothing about the strict musical features of the music has anything to do with undermining authority or assaulting the standard of the musical form. I would say the most important relationship in rap music is not the internal structure of the music. I think the more interesting relationship is between the structure of the music and the human mind.
How does the mind receive the sound structure that rap music is trying to give? The simple repetition of the music and the heavy beat make a kind of sound structure that is really attractive to the mind. Because the 5 second cycle repeats itself so frequently and because of the heavy beat this music generally blocks out all other sound inputs. Many other types of music and sounds have more variation in volume, pattern, and the length of the repetition of each sound cycle. Most people's minds will take the path of least resistance and sync to the simple and consistent sound structure that rap music provides. Interestingly enough the 5 second cycle of rap music is similar to the 4-6 second duration of a shot used in TV in movies. There are huge similarities between the affects of the consistent picture change every 4-6 seconds on TV and a consistent 5 second cycle in rap music. Between 4-6 seconds is usually long enough for the mind to understand and absorb, but also short enough that the mind doesn't want to separate itself from the consistency of the input. Consistency is relaxation. While the sound structure of rap music is very simple it also is filled with beauty because it acknowledges and utilizes the way the mind moves.
So now that the mind is relaxed and receiving consistent sound input and so let us add the lyrics. Your mind will have trouble ignoring the consistency of the lyrics because they are coming to you through a very mentally appealing sound structure. The words will probably be absorbed as easily as the sound. The musical structure function like advertising in that if you keep pounding the same message home from the same source there is no mental room for other inputs. Does this mean the negative meaning of the words is absorbed and the negative actions that follow the words are adsorbed? Not necessarily, but your mind is physically absorbing them and anything that is absorbed has some kind of effect.
I'd like to explore the psychology of rap music for a moment especially since you included the following quote: Katie Couric got an answer to this question when she asked Lil’ Wayne what it means to be a gangsta rapper. Lil’ Wayne’s response: “I don't take nothin' from no one. I do what I wanna do. And I'm gonna do that until the day I die."
Many of the people that I know who are the most heavily invested in rap music have lives that lack consistent positive input. These people's lives also tend to lack reciprocal relationships with other people and within the parts of their own person. This is what Lil Wayne is talking about. I don't know much about Lil Wayne, but that attitude seems like an active rejection of some kind of structure that was imposed him. Was that a broken family, poverty, or loneliness? I don't know well enough to say, but all those things seem worthy of rejection. Unfortunately, his attitude perpetuates the very thing he is trying to escape from. He will invent and impose his structure on others rather than be the one that is being imposed on. This attitude completely misses the point. This attitude will never allow for the building of a relationship that contains positive giving to others and receiving from others. Which interestingly relates back to the music and exposes the music's greatest functionality and fault. Rap music is effective for imposing a structure and seems to have been designed to escape from being imposed on, yet it perpetuates same method of domination that it rebels against.
All this aside I think the formal sound structure of rap music is an ingenious acknowledgment of how the mind functions and receives input.
Remember???
...AND ... We can't trust the New Generation.....?
Remember?? (Maybe we can't...(?))
I know NOTHING about RAP...............


