Ads


Keeping the (Year of) Faith in 2012

Coinciding with the 50th anniversary of the opening of Vatican II, the twentieth year since the publication of the Catechism, and the first-ever Synod on the New Evangelization, 2012 has been declared the “Year of Faith.” As Benedict underscored in his 2011 Christmas address to the Roman Curia, the Year of Faith is meant to incite more than lively belief; its celebration is also a call to glance backward and to look forward.

The Year of Faith provides a chance to remember both the fruits and the failures of the Second Vatican Council’s implementation, with honest clarity. The failure to transmit the habits of piety coupled with the advance of an aggressive secularism led many young people, often after years of sitting at the desks of parochial classrooms, simply to abandon the Church. Such baptized but unformed souls never have nor ever will attend the fraternities, Catechism classes, or processions that their parents took for granted.

An alternative response has been the revival of energetic orthodoxy. The cultural conditions that alienated some young people and their parents have galvanized others. These youth are the fruit of Blessed John Paul II’s call for the New Evangelization and have been emboldened by the courage of Benedict XVI. Increasingly, seminaries and monasteries are filled with young men and women such as these.

With the 2012 worldwide Synod on the New Evangelization, we must consider anew what strategies are congruent with the task of preaching in our time. Of course, we should be leery of grand plans that would propose to remake the Church in the name of relevance. Even so, as Cardinal Newman once said in relation to the development of doctrine, since the Church militant needs to march through time, she must in a certain sense constantly be on the move.

If in this generation the Church is to advance her world-transforming mission we can aim for no less than these four practical objectives: the ending of abortion; the return of large families; the renewal of classical education; and the building of better churches. These correspond, so it seems, to the most pressing political, social, educational, and liturgical needs of the Church in the West.

As grace builds upon nature, so Catholic culture builds upon certain goods, like society. If low birth rates are both a symptom and cause of cultural decline, then killing your children is an act of cultural suicide. (Christians cannot be fooled by those who would reduce abortion to an evil equal to, say, unfair immigration rules. They are not equivalent. The good of life is more basic than the good of mobility.) Next, besides defending children, Christians need to have more of them. Even the UN now admits that demographic meltdown chills the economy. The Church, for her part, has never abrogated its longstanding commendation of large families. As from the Catechism: “Sacred Scripture and the Church’s traditional practice see in large families a sign of God’s blessing and the parents’ generosity.” (The italics are in the original.)

Third, we must take control of our own children’s education. Since John Dewey the professional guild of educators have been trained according to a progressive philosophy that destroys memory. Teaching Latin conveniently forges a link to the history, art, literature, and philosophy of the West that has been largely shaped by the Catholic Church. Catholic parents feel a need to introduce their children to what is noble and fine in the Christian intellectual tradition, which explains, at least in part, the rise of independent Christian academies and of home-schooling (which grows at a rate of 7 percent per year).

A final objective: let us build better churches. Culture follows cult. If Christian culture depends upon learning, it presupposes piety. Activism and education—necessary as these are—will lose their way if not nourished by a rich liturgical experience. So, alongside this Year of Faith, believers need to remember again what it means to celebrate that faith with solemnity. Given the often reckless liturgical experimentation of the last fifty years, any effort at re-evangelizing the West will depend on a renewal of liturgical piety. With the new translation of the Novus Ordo and a new lease on life given to the old form of the Mass, this renewal is now well underway.

Pope Benedict’s call for the Year of Faith is a call, at the least, for the defense of life, for the flourishing of the family, for the renewal of education, and for the revival of cult. But all programs for reform must be taken in the right spirit. It is not committees or conferences that will ultimately bring about the New Evangelization. It will be our Lord himself. Who knows under which florescent bulb the next great saint is studying, or serving? In one very real sense, the Year of Faith should teach us that there is nothing for us to do. As the Russian monastic Seraph of Serov memorably said, “Acquire a peaceful spirit and then thousands of others round you will be saved.”

Ryan N. S. Topping, is the Visiting Chair in Studies in Catholic Theology at the John XXIII Centre for Catholic Thought at St. Thomas University, Fredericton, Canada. These reflections are adapted from a manuscript which he is completing titled “Lazarus Rising: The Catechism and the Renewal of Catholic Culture”.

Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.

Comments:

1.23.2012 | 8:40am
Fr. Andrew says:
Professor Topping, your four points are concise and achievable, thank you. What citation to you have of the U.N.'s concern of demographic "winter?" That would be helpful.

I understand it is rare for a First Things author to respond to comments- perhaps someone else knows as well?
1.23.2012 | 1:21pm
bill bannon says:
    Catholic tradition on large families is continuous only in our imagination.  It actually takes place consistently in Christian groups who can rely on each other in disasters... like the Amish and Hutterites.  I give you the two main Fathers of the Church slighting or disparaging large families amongst Christians which large families they felt were appropo only to Jewish OT times in order to increase and produce a safe context for the eventual Messiah.....you can imagine the hundreds of thousands of Catholics, celibate and married, who followed their lead subsequently.  Both men tended to want marrieds to be kind of celibate like vowed people.  Chrysostom thought similarly but I can't find the cite for him.

Augustine in "The Good of Marriage"...

section 17
"For there is not now necessity of begetting children, as there then was, when, even when wives bare children, it was allowed, in order for a more numerous posterity, to marry other wives in addition, which now is certainly not lawful."
section 19
  " For in these (moderns) the very desire of sons is carnal, but in those (OT patriarchs) it was spiritual, in that it was suited to the sacrament of that time. Forsooth now no one who is made perfect in piety seeks to have sons, save after a spiritual sense; but then it was the work of piety itself to beget sons even after a carnal sense: in that the begetting of that people was fraught with tidings of things to come, and pertained unto the prophetic dispensation."

Jerome saw "be fruitful and multiply" as falling under the curse of the law in two documents:

Against Helvidius / section 21:  "So long as that law remained, "Be fruitful, and multiply and replenish the earth" [Gen. 1:28]; and "Cursed is the barren woman that bears not seed in Israel" [cf. Ex. 23:26], they all married and were given in marriage, left father and mother, and became one flesh....But once in tones of thunder the words were heard, "The time is shortened, that henceforth those that have wives may be as though they had none" [1 Cor. 7:29], cleaving to the Lord, we are made one spirit with Him. And why? Because "He that is unmarried is careful for the things of the Lord...". ( Jerome here strangely conflates the Christian married and the celibate therein as both not needing children).

Letter to Eustochium. letter XXII.  Jerome...
20. I praise wedlock, I praise marriage, but it is because they give me virgins. I gather the rose from the thorns, the gold from the earth, the pearl from the shell. 
21. The old law had a DIFFERENT ideal of blessedness, for therein it is said: "Blessed is he who hath seed in Zion and a family in Jerusalem:"(5) and "Cursed is the barren who beareth not:"(6) and "Thy children shall be like olive-plants round about thy table."
1.23.2012 | 9:09pm
Don Roberto says:
Mr. Topping, I agree. I have been very happy since we began home schooling five years ago. The families we have met are great. May God grant that the New Evangelization continue to bear fuit.

Fr. Andrew, you might want to type "global ageing crisis" into your search engine. "Demographic winder" is a term that tends to be used by those of us who worry about the issue more from a moral and cultural viewpoiint that an economic one, the U.N. being an example of the latter.

Mr. Bannon, you wouldn't deny the importance of demography, would you? While their writings have great wisdom still, Jerome and Augustine were focused on their contemporaries, and perhaps at that time the balance called for more immediate cleaving and less worry about the following generation. Scripture (read properly, i.e., in its entirelty) covers all of human history, and at present, with so many people placing pleasure and comfort above God, the bias is against children. Good people are open to as many children as they can raise and pass the Faith on to.

1.23.2012 | 10:40pm
Mark VA says:
The author wrote:

"Teaching Latin conveniently forges a link to the history, art, literature, and philosophy of the West that has been largely shaped by the Catholic Church."

Very true and necessary, in a sense, but it could also be needlessly restrictive, especially since the concept of the "West" is fluid (Norman Davies, in the introduction to his "Europe", has something to say about this).

Additionally, the Catholic Church can grow and thrive with or without the "West", whereas the opposite is debatable. In view of this, one could argue that the "Great Books Scheme" is in need of a thorough overhaul, if it is to be of any service to the present and future needs of the members of this universal society.

In other words, what I suggest is that what the author proposes is good, but not enough.
1.24.2012 | 12:23am
bill bannon says:
Don Roberto
I'm making no value judgement myself on the topic of children numbers but I am very tired of what passes for Catholic history even in this case in a catechism comment.
If you read Aquinas cover to cover in the ST, you see him citing Augustine verbatim as authoritative on multiple sexual issues ( including the IC...ergo both erred together therein) in the 13th century while Augustine wrote in the 4th and 5th century. 800 years went by and Augustine had verbatim authority in the 13th which means his and Jerome's ideas on child numbers probably lasted 800 years with many people til Aquinas and how many centuries thereafter? The Church has existed 2000 and Augustine's views lasted at minimum 800...and I'm being stingy.
I see cheerleading in places where there should be history. Pope Leo XIII did the exact type of cheerleading "history" when he wrote the Brazilian Bishops about the Popes and slavery....a letter shown to be fiction once Fed judge/ Catholic historian, John Noonan Jr. examined that area in great detail.
Having many children is wonderful in the US and Canada where the government gives tax support and widows and children are covered by SS in the US. But pan to India where I sent money for ten years to a woman whose husband died and where there was no government help and she had to give her children to orphanges and work as a maid to be near them and visit them in the orphanges.
And in four Catholic countries...Brazil, Phillipines, East Timor and Uruguay...there are street waif problems...children living on the streets. China sees that right off her coast....two Catholic countries with street waifs. That takes credibility away from Rome telling China that Rome knows what China should do about population. China cannot afford to have on its scale a street waif problem
proportionate to the one in East Timor which is 97% Catholic or proportionate to the Phillipines.
10.6.2012 | 8:50pm
Robert says:
I only have one concern. I teach 12 year students in my parish's CCD program, and I want them and all of the other students I have taught for the last 42 years, to receive an injection of Faith that will bring them to Mother Church, and to the Faith that Jesus taught to His disciples, and the same Faith that I want to teach to these children today in 2012. I see the waning of their faith as each year goes by, and I want them to go beyond secularism that they experience every day in every aspects of their life, and come to recognize the love of Jesus within them, and the growing of their faith in the Catholic Church. I want the children to be ready for the call from God to live their life in the grace of salvation, and to grow in that grace to the filling of their souls, and their ability to pass that faith on to other people in their life. I am here to plant the seeds of faith; I just want the ground of the children's sould to be properly prepared.
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact