In so many Christian contexts today, it is almost impossible to avoid hearing about the importance of discerning one’s “personal vocation.” This label, apparently, is meant to denote the specific calling God gives to each individual, through which each is to live out his own particular call to holiness. Yet this language reflects only a half-truth. We are indeed meant to follow the will of God in all that we do. But such popular talk of one’s “calling” also betrays a crucial misunderstanding of discernment, a cardinal error that is entirely foreign to the great tradition of the Church.
The confusion is rooted in the oft-overlooked sin of presumption. For when a Christian goes to prayer with the expectation that God will reveal to him a personalized plan for his life, he presumes that God will make him the recipient of a miraculous private revelation. Now, our Christian history has seen numerous instances of his doing exactly that, particularly with some of the Church’s most venerable mystic saints. But God is under no constraints to act in this way, and far be it for me to deem myself worthy to receive so extraordinary a message from Our Lord.
But if a Christian is not to presume that God will supernaturally reveal his “personal vocation” to him, how then is he to know God’s will for his life? I would contend that, if he has been going to church on a weekly basis and has received at least average catechesis along the way, he probably already does know his will for his life. God summarizes it succinctly in the Ten Commandments, and even more succinctly in Matthew 22: “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind”, and “You shall love your neighbor as yourself”. That, further informed by the ordinances of the Church, is all the instruction we need to achieve our fulfillment and arrive at salvation.
In a recent documentary on Eastern Christian monasticism, NYU’s Norris Chumley asked a monk in the Ukraine if God speaks to him in prayer. “He does not speak to me,” the monk answered, “because he has already said everything, through the Gospel and through the works of the Holy Fathers, of the saints.” Such a response might sound borderline blasphemous to contemporary Christians. And yet, this answer reflects perfectly the consensus of the Church over the past 2,000 years. In general, it seems that God provides the graces people need to serve him in whatever station of life they occupy.
So God does not tell each of us exactly what to do all the time. In fact, he does not necessarily even tell us what to do with regards to major life choices, including choices between religious and secular life. He gifts us with any number of good and virtuous options, and then leaves the decision to us. As a mantra classically attributed to St. Augustine puts it, “Love God and do what you will.”
This attitude obviously flies in the face of most of today’s popular literature on vocation, wherein “discerners” are told to look within themselves to see if their desires indicate that God has singled them out to live a religious life. So, in addition to the prideful presumption lurking within that common strategy, this typical modern message about discernment also sows a dangerous confusion about the nature of a religious vocation.
The religious life is a higher calling, not an esoteric, separate one. Just as giving an extra hundred dollars to the collection plate is not as good as giving an extra thousand, still both are goods, and there is no immorality in opting out of the heroically generous higher option. That is an ancient doctrine of the faith, but too often today people shy away from it and try to mitigate the revealed truth that a religious vocation is more perfect than any secular life can be. The message of Our Lord and St. Paul in the Scriptures, and that of the Church’s tradition throughout history, is simply this: “Let those who can take religious life take it.”
God tells Jeremiah that he knows well the plans he has made for him, “plans for his welfare and not for his woe.” What he does not say is that Jeremiah will likewise know these plans before they come to fruition. God promises never to abandon the Christian in his pilgrimage towards Heaven, but not that the path ahead will be made clear to him before he walks it. Does this seemingly radical rejection of “personal vocation” mean that God does not care what I do with my life? Of course it does not. It simply means that God does not condemn all ways but one.
The Christian ought to make major life decisions as he ought to make all decisions: by evaluating how he can serve God, by choosing a course of action accordingly, and by having the courage to follow through and do it. As Pope Benedict XVI writes, “If I listen to [God] and walk with Him, I become truly myself. What counts is not the fulfillment of my desires, but of his will. In this way life becomes authentic.” May we each have the courage to live such an authentic life, free from the unnecessary burdens we impose on ourselves by becoming too preoccupied with what one of my friends refers to as “an over-devotion to Our Lady of Perpetual Discernment.”
Michael Hannon studies philosophy, religion, and medieval studies at Columbia University.
Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.
Comments:
And? Arguably, the Bible itself grew tired of prophets per se: in Jeremiah there are many complaints about "false prophets." While the OT concludes with an expectation that in the end, "every prophet" will be "ashamed" of his vision. And in the New Testament? Jesus in the NT warned that there would be many "false prophets" after him.
Was the Bible itself in the end, becoming disenchanted with prophets and soothsayers? Becoming more "secular"? Or certainly, more supportive of lay vocations?
Religious Vocation: An Unnecessary Mystery.
This is an over-simplication and does not accurately reflect Catholic teaching on personal vocation and mission. See especially Pope John Paul II, Christifideles Laici on this topic, and LifeWork by Ignatius Press.
A certain type of personality prefers to approach life this way, and decrees that other Christians should as well, or fail in their spirituality.
My cure came from CS Lewis, partly, and from reading the New England Puritans, who recognised the general and specific calling of the Christian, and considered the latter of no value compared to the former.
Amen, this really is the consensus of the last 2000 years. This is basically exactly what St John of the Cross says, in Jesus Christ, the Word of God, God has already said everything, and has nothing more to add.
Those rare times when God speaks to us are to be greatly treasured. Free will would be less meaningful in a world where God often reveals Himself overtly.
†
How does one become convinced if God is calling without noticing and embracing the fruit of conversations with Him, conversations that obviously include desires. Desires are not self evidently clear and so as Benedict says they must be placed within the context of guidance. Such guidance, which includes both interior movements of the soul and attention to external input from trusted spiritual leaders, is crucial for a man to enter before he embraces priesthood. This process is commonly known as discernment.
And as far as the monk noting that God does not speak to him....hmmm. What is this monk doing as he is reading the scriptures? Applying them to some generic human situation or is he discerning the scriptures relevance to his own concrete life? If the latter... God is speaking to him, personally.
"So God does not tell each of us exactly what to do all the time. In fact, he does not necessarily even tell us what to do with regards to major life choices, including choices between religious and secular life. He gifts us with any number of good and virtuous options, and then leaves the decision to us. As a mantra classically attributed to St. Augustine puts it, 'Love God and do what you will.'"
Those called to a priestly vocation, a religious life or a lay calling eventually see the journey to arriving as a bundle of resistances. God's gentleness in abiding with our resistances until his light gradually builds up in us, seeping through our walls, eventually instills a profound gratitude in the person with each piecemeal advance.
Jane Mansfield’s father knew that his daughter had been called to be a writer, that there were no other options from God, although He would have abided in any case if she had chosen another path, and her dad decided to support that calling no matter what the expense, monetarily and emotionally. And Mansfield addressed this dynamic of calling (how we are all called to our baptismal priesthood, our holy orders and our ordination) in what I believe his her greatest novel, "Mansfield Park". In it she simply shows how those who are not listening to how they are called journey into wasted lives, and those who listen to how they are called and embrace the specifics of how they are called find a path to the fullness of joy and happiness.
This notion of God providing options of equal value just doesn't sit well with me. What I do think is true is that every person can opt out of what God calls him/her to do in every specific situation, and in opting out God still abides and providentially graces us until we move back on track, and abides when we move off that track again. We are, after all, to be perfect as our Father is perfect, and that we fail in this most of the time humbles us, always trying to return to doing everything that God would choose if he were in our situation, his will.
I also have to disagree with the monk who said, "He does not speak to me because he has already said everything, through the Gospel and through the works of the Holy Fathers, of the saints." Unless he meant something other than how his words are being interpreted here.
I just wrote this today:
Pray all the time. That is what is required of every Christian. But how? We must first acknowledge that Jesus speaks to us in every second, even from behind the door we refuse to open when he knocks.
Second, we must respond to his voice with a Marion “Yes”, an invitation for him to enter our room. Our room then becomes the rich soil where Jesus’ words are planted and grow into a beautiful flower that will pollinate the world.
This pollination is praying all the time.
**********
When I hear Jesus’ voice I respond, “Yes Lord…Bless you Lord…Thank you Lord.” This response is provided by our Lord, for he provides all good things. And it occurred to me one day that this response is complete in its receiving him, worshiping him and expressing gratitude for his visit.
From this place a desire is birthed to go out into the world to share the good news of his visit, and that he has no desire to leave.
Christians should be a little less self-satisfied and cocksure, about how perfect things already are. When they do, they look exactly like the Pharisees, after all.
The Last Word is yet to come.
I'd only add that, once we realize our calling is more simple than we might have thought, that the Lord calls us not to keep discerning what to do, but to simply be in deeper relationship with him. I may have read you wrongly, but your article's tone seems to make light of the relationship that a Christian is meant to have with the Lord. Daily discernment of spirits, of our own thoughts and desires, is, truly, perpetual, in the sense that we will always be looking at our concupiscent lives and asking God to further purify them, no matter what our larger vocation is.
Your article, although very helpful, could perhaps lead a reader to a more deistic conception of God, which is not what Augustine meant when he wrote "Love God and do what you will", this being the man who wrote such an intimate and painstaking portrait of his own discernment and relationship with God in the Confessions.
I would challenge your simplistic view of the criteria of sanctity which you contend to be weekly mass and an average catechesis topped off by loving God and doing what one wills. You may argue with this, you may not, but I believe you neglect the core wisdom of the saints by not mentioning the hinge which a good, Christian life turns upon--a personal relationship with Christ.
(Perhaps some confusion arises about these two things: 1) discernment of God's plan, which is a means to an end, and 2) relationship with Christ, beatitude, contemplation, the end in His self. You have properly simplified the first while not mentioning the second.)
That too, esp. in these latter times , when we might need to care more about what are the deepest convictions that move us !
'Honor your Mother and Father ' - one very basic one and an area that the need to consider ...The Lady of Perpetual Discernment - from The Presence of The Holy Spirit with her , that could avoid much confusion , in this regard , thus helping us to fulfill another dictate - ' rejoice always ' , knowing who we are , in her !
There is the incident, in bio of St.Faustina , may be to help us little people not to loose heart , when it comes to making decisions in a hurry ( like St.Peter , who jumped in , in the zeal of fallen human nature, to admonish The Lord and was put in his place , so that he could do so for others too, down through the centuriees ! )
She was given direct directions from The Lord , about plans for an Order of nuns she was to start - yet her superiors could not agree at the time .
She discerend the Lord's will from trusting them , inspite of the interior struggles she mentions this caused her which possibly was to earn her much , as a powerful intercessor for those who too would have to wait and wrestle , prayerfully , unless The Church has spoken clearly !
The Order of her congregation has come to exist , besides the nuns , in the form of the many laity also who too try to follow in the devotion to Divine Mercy , trusting that
exercising of our priesthood , to pray and praise , esp. in and for those areas that are in special need , is always occsion for gratitude !
May the times of Mary Immaculate help to mitigate for any lack of discernement in all our lives !
Frankly I find it interesting that Mr. Hannon sees a need to write this piece. I must be living in a very different climate of Catholicism than Mr. Hannon. None of the vocation directors I know pushes the "holier than thou" argument to discerners. It's all about self knowledge. Who am I? Who has God created me to be? Obviously the answer to this question might well be "a priest" or "a religious" but it could also be "a plumber" or "a yachtsman" if these vocations are both personally fulfilling and likewise fulfill our baptismal promises.
"And Ananias went his way, and entered into the house; and putting his hands on him said, Brother Saul, the Lord, even Jesus, that appeared unto thee in the way as thou camest, hath sent me, that thou mightest receive thy sight, and be filled with the Holy Ghost. "
Some commentators confuse this with the priestly vocation, which is a particular call. Not all single men are called to be priests, but all are called to be celibate.
(Yet while all are called by Our Lord, few are chosen--it is not a sin to marry.)
I understand your reasoning when you write, "Some commentators confuse this with the priestly vocation, which is a particular call. Not all single men are called to be priests, but all are called to be celibate."
All Christians are all called to be priests, prophets and kings, and why early on in the Church the phrase "the royal priesthood" was coined to describe every Christian. Of course there is a particular calling, the ministerial priesthood, open to men alone who are called to that particularity. But one of the great modern confusions in the Catholic Church is women who experience being called to be priests not being assisted in discerning that they are to embrace that calling, a calling every Christian can experience if open to it. And so it goes that with no understanding of the royal priesthood, many women feel slighted in not being allowed to be ministerial priests.
Does this mean we choose without prayer and being open to God's input? No. God can and will talk to people, even directly and clearly, but I've found, and my friends have found, it often happens more in the midst of doing rather than in the midst of waiting. For example, God put me on a path for a graduate degree I would never have guessed, and it did become clear not until I had already started looking at graduate school options.
Like all things spiritual, balance is necessary. Discernment is a process that requires prayer. But God also has given us great opportunities as gifts, and to ignore them out of fear (think of how often Jesus commands "Do not be afraid") that we might make a mistake can also mean refusing what God is offering. After all, as Stephen Sondheim said in "Into the Woods", not choosing is also a choice.
Our Lord and Saviour, in the Gospels of Ss. Matthew and Luke, notes to the Pharisees demanding a sign from Him that 'a wicked and adulterous generation asks for a sign' but that none will be given to such persons but the 'sign of Jonah' - that is, repent and be baptised. 'Adulterous' is an aptly revealing description of the mentality that is so easy for us humans to cultivate - a mentality that is superstitious, nail-biting, untrusting, and tinged with gnosticism. I don't say this polemically - 'me versus them' - because this is the human struggle, in which I too participate. We struggle with it, and the Israelites certainly found it difficult to avoid this sort of mentality . . . hence, their return (over and again) to the pull-lever-and-discern idolatry of Ba'al, while all the time God was asking them to trust Him and His sovereign will at work in them.
Mr. Hannon isn't 'over-simplifying' the issue, and he isn't letting us off the hook - as some have suggested here. This reveals the heart of the misunderstanding, that somehow we need to be 'doing something else' in addition to being faithful to the New Covenant. To live out God's revealed will is the most difficult task most of us will ever face, and it will consume our lives if given its propre weight. In seeking to align ourselves to this, God's revealed moral will, we will also mystically be using the prudence and other graces God offers to make our life decisions. And should He break through the clouds to walk with us in a miraculous manifestation, our hearts will be burning within us.
Knowing God, following Him, loving Him, living for Him, praying to Him and making daily serious life-altering decisions regarding His will are all complex concepts where the matrix of self-knowledge, formation, and personality, personal freedom, and tradition intersect in many different ways. You can't really do justice to the idea in the haphazard way it is addressed in this post, although I can sympathize with the frustrating, seemingly endless, self- focussed issue the author seems to be trying to discuss here. I hope this will come up again but with a more thorough treatment.


