Ads


How Would St. Germanus Site Your Church?

In recent years, much work has been done to restore the traditional principles of church design; one principle, however, is still often overlooked: siting. St. Germanus is brief and clear on the subject, as always. In the final section of Ecclesiastical History and Mystical Contemplation, which deals directly with architectural matters, he says:


Praying toward the East is handed down by the holy apostles, as is everything else. This is because the comprehensible sun of righteousness, Christ our God, appeared on earth in those regions of the East where the perceptible sun rises, as the prophet says: "Orient is his name" (Zech 6:12); and "Bow before the Lord, all the earth, who ascended to the heaven of heavens in the East" (cf Ps 67:34); and "Let us prostrate ourselves in the place where his feet stood" (cf Ps 67:34); and again, "The feet of the Lord shall stand upon the Mount of Olives in the East" (Zech 14:4). The prophets also speak thus because of our fervent hope of receiving again the paradise in Eden, as well as the brightness of the second coming of Christ our God, from the East.

For St. Germanus, praying toward the east meant that at Mass, the priest and assembly were both on the same side of the altar. The priest was not facing the people; all faced God together. Likewise, church buildings, including St. Germanus’ Hagia Sophia, were commonly orientated, that is, the front doors were located toward the west and the sanctuary was located toward the east.

Note in his last sentence St. Germanus mentions two goals: Eden and the Second Coming. Thus one's movement through the church building, from west to east, darkness to light, front door to Sanctuary, is a metaphor for the personal Christian life: conception in original sin; baptism and life in sanctifying grace; increasing sanctifying grace through a life of virtue assisted by the sacraments; and finally, death, judgment, and (we hope) the Beatific Vision, that is, Eden. This structural orientation is also a metaphor for all of salvation history: from the Old Testament age of prophecy, to the New Testament age of grace, to the Second Coming and the end of the world.

There is a prominent exception to this basic rule for church siting. The earliest church buildings in Rome, built centuries before St. Germanus was born, were oriented in the exact reverse direction, that is, with the doors to the east and the sanctuary to the west. The priest in these churches stood on the west side of the altar and effectively faced the people on the other side. Liturgical scholars tell us that, at a certain point in the Mass, the assembly turned around, the church doors were opened, and all faced the rising sun in the east.

So far as I know, we can only speculate as to why these basilicas were sited this way. Three reasons are commonly offered: first, it may have been to accommodate the confessio, the tomb of a saint located underneath the high altar, often with steps leading down to it (as at St. Peter's Basilica in Rome), or the sanctuary and altar can be raised up a few steps so that the confessio is at the same level as the nave (as at San Clemente, for example). Either way, a small, simple confessio prevents the celebrant from standing on the same side of the altar as the congregation. Second, it may have been an attempt to imitate the Temple at Jerusalem, whose doors were to the east, and Holy of Holies to the west. Finally, some claim the orientation was intended to imitate synagogues, which pointed toward the Temple at Jerusalem.



The confessio below the high altar at Santa Maria in Trastevere
makes it impossible to say Mass from the assembly's side of the altar.

St. Germanus' explanation of the symbolism of the parts—that the sanctuary is Christ's tomb; and that the apse is the cave in which He was buried; and that the altar is the spot in the tomb in which Christ was placed suggests a fourth possible reason: as one moves from east to west, from light to darkness, one joins Christ's Passion, death, and burial. When one turns around part way through the liturgy and moves from west to east, one is joined to his resurrection and ascension, and is ready to greet him when he comes again.

As beautiful as the architectural symbolism of this reverse orientation is, it strikes most people as a rather awkward arrangement for liturgy. Yet the orientation of church buildings was considered so important that people were willing to live with unusual siting in order to get it. The result sometimes produces churches like Saint Agnes Outside the Walls in Rome, where the front door is not located on the main road (the Via Nomentana) but rather near the apse. To gain access from this side, a small portico just to the north of the apse leads to the side aisle mezzanine, the ancient matroneum. This was a difficult architectural problem. On the other hand, it is just this sort of problem which sets the stage for an original and memorable solution.




A contemporary view from the Via Nomentana.


After the Middle Ages, Christians gradually stopped insisting on orientated churches. Nevertheless, we continue to refer to the sanctuary as "liturgical east" whether it is truly east or not. Of course, the orientation of our church buildings is wrapped up in liturgical questions which are beyond the scope of the architect, to be sure. But so far as this profession is concerned, a recovery of the practice would be most welcome. For a church which prays toward the east is architecturally, if not necessarily spiritually, richer for it.

Dino Marcantonio is an architect practicing in New York City, a co-founder of the Catholic Artists Society, and a board member of the Society for Catholic Liturgy. He has taught at the Yale School of Architecture and the University of Notre Dame. His Twitter account is @DinoMarcantonio.

Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.

Comments:

2.3.2012 | 4:36am
Michael PS says:
The bishop’s throne was always on the South side, on account of the words “In caelum conscendam super astra Dei exaltabo solium meum sedebo in monte testamenti in lateribus aquilonis” [I will exalt my throne above the stars of God, and I will sit upon the mount of assembly, in the recesses of the north] – Is 14:13
2.3.2012 | 4:41am
Grigoris says:
Another indication of how important orientation was to the early Church is that the many pagan temples that were converted into churches had to be refitted. Since most Greek temples had their doors to the east, this meant tearing out a new door on the back wall and building an apse where the previous doors had been. It may be that this architectural polemic, in addition to the scriptural and theological reasons, helped solidify the Christian's insistence on praying ad orientem.
2.3.2012 | 4:19pm
Phil Brandt says:
Mr Marcantonio mentions the inherited tradition of the temple and synagogue as one possible reason for the ancient practice and another posting individual mentions the orientation of pagan temples. I was taught some years ago that this was a matter of significant import for the Jewish community. The hebrew word for repent "shub" literally means turn around. When the prophets called upon the ancient Israelites to repent of their idolatry, it would have literally meant a turning about, from the eastern facing pagan altars to the western facing Jewish altar.

i wonder if the earliest Christian communities, even in Rome, which would have included Jewish Christians did not retain some of that idea that eastern facing altars were just too "pagan" in their minds. Was it only generations later when the Jewish Christian population was proportionally much smaller that the gentile Christian church would theologize the eastern facing altar.

Which of course puts all this into the realm of a discussion about what is fruitful and healthy, not what is necessary or prescribed. God surely heard the prayers spoken by my former parishioners whose "east" wall was actually due south.
2.3.2012 | 4:46pm
Imdb says:
In the first three centuries of the Early Christian Church, the practice of Christianity was illegal and few churches were constructed. In the beginning Christians worshipped along with Jews in synagogues and in private houses. After the separation of Jews and Christians the latter continued to worship in people's houses, known as house churches. These were often the homes of the wealthier members of the faith.
2.4.2012 | 5:48am
Mark VA says:
My recently built church is orientated. May I mention that in addition to the theological reasons for continuing this practice, which the author so wonderfully outlined, there is also one striking visual benefit - the stained glass window over the altar is illuminated with sublime light during the morning Mass.
2.4.2012 | 10:45am
Peg says:
There is much food for thought in this essay and in the contributions of the people commenting on it. Speaking of food, I am reminded of the works of Margaret Visser, best known for her examination of the rituals, history, and symbolism of meals and food. However, she is also the author of a fascinating book on the meaning of churches, called "The Geometry of Love: Space, Time, Mystery, and Meaning in an Ordinary Church". She could have chosen any church for her discussion of the "intentionally meaningful" aspects of church architecture, but she happened to pick St. Agnes Outside the Walls, mentioned in Dino Marcantonio's article above.

Ms. Visser goes from the entrance to the narthex, nave, altar, apse,etc., and includes historical, anthropological, liturgical and theological explanations. She discusses the forms, purposes, and symbolism of the structure. Her purpose was to learn how we should "read" a church building, "how to interpret what it does and says, whether we are of any faith or none". She is a devout Christian so there is that additional insight that is so often missing in works by agnostics or atheists.
2.4.2012 | 12:32pm
There is poignance in Dino Marcantonio's final comment---the recognition that architectural richness can exist in isolation from spiritual richness. I think of my own local parish where no architectural grace would change the sensibilities at play between priest and congregation. Set aside the boiler plate sermons that rarely, if ever, touch on the historical significance of the readings or any moral issue other than racism (on the assumption that a predominantly white suburban parish is riddled with bigotry). Take simply the manners of the liturgical performance. Each Sunday brings another off-the-cuff attempt to amuse, to be "relevant" with references to the Super Bowl, to Tim Tebow's latest game, or whatever sports event is in the news. Then there is that spasm of glad-handing called "the kiss of peace." There is clapping for the music at the end, as if Mass were a lounge act. The orientation on display derives from the world of entertainment, not of worship. Whether we face east or not, we are a congregation no longer. We have dwindled into an audience.
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact