It was around two o’clock in the afternoon on the eve of the Day of All Saints, October 31, 1517, when Martin Luther, hammer in hand, approached the main north door of the Schlosskirche (Castle Church) in Wittenberg and nailed up his Ninety-Five Theses protesting the abuse of indulgences in the teaching and practice of the church of his day. In remembrance of this event, millions of Christians still celebrate this day as the symbolic beginning of the Protestant Reformation. At Beeson Divinity School, for example, we do not celebrate Halloween on October 31. Instead we have a Reformation party.
But did this event really happen? Erwin Iserloh, a Catholic Reformation scholar, attributed the story of the theses-posting to later myth-making. He pointed to the fact that the story was first told by Philip Melanchthon long after Luther’s death. Other Luther scholars rushed to defend the historicity of the hammer blows of Wittenberg. In fact, the door of the Castle Church did serve as the official university bulletin board and was regularly used for exactly the kind of announcement Luther made when he called for a public disputation on indulgences.
But whether the event happened at two o’clock in the afternoon, or at all, is not the point. Copies of Luther’s theses were soon distributed by humanist scholars all over Europe. Within just a few weeks, an obscure Augustinian monk in a backwater university town had become a household name and was the subject of chatter from Lisbon to Lithuania.
It was not Luther’s intention to divide the Church, much less to start a brand new church. To the end of his life, he considered himself to be a faithful and obedient servant of the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church. Though Luther renounced his monastic vows and married a former nun, Katarina von Bora, he never forgot that he had received a doctorate in Holy Scripture. His vocation was to teach the written Word of God and to point men and women to the Lord of Scripture, Jesus Christ.
On this Reformation Day, it is good to remember that Martin Luther belongs to the entire Church, not only to Lutherans and Protestants, just as Thomas Aquinas is a treasury of Christian wisdom for faithful believers of all denominations, not simply for Dominicans and Catholics. This point was recognized several years ago by Franz-Josef Bode, the Catholic Bishop of Osnabrück in northern Germany, when he preached on Luther at an ecumenical service. “It’s fascinating,” he said, “just how radically Luther puts God at the center.”
Luther’s teaching that every human being at every moment of life stands absolutely coram deo—before God, confronted face-to-face by God—led him to confront the major misunderstanding in the church of his day that grace and forgiveness of sins could be bought and sold like wares in the market. “The focus on Christ, the Bible and the authentic Word are things that we as the Catholic church today can only underline,” Bode said. The bishop’s views have been echoed by many other Catholic theologians since the Second Vatican Council as Luther’s teachings, especially his esteem for the Word of God, has come to be appreciated in a way that would have been unthinkable a century ago.
Next year will mark the fifteenth anniversary of the Joint Declaration of Justification between the Lutheran World Federation and the Catholic Church. Like The Gift of Salvation statement issued by Evangelicals and Catholics Together in 1997, the Joint Declaration represents a measure of convergence between Catholic and Reformational understandings of that article of faith by which the Church either stands or falls, to quote a favorite Lutheran saying. For example, the Joint Declaration asserts, “We confess together: By grace alone, in faith in Christ’s saving work and not because of any merit on our part, we are accepted by God and receive the Holy Spirit, who renews our hearts while equipping and calling us to good works.”
But convergence on justification does not equal consensus on all aspects of the doctrine of salvation. The framers of the Joint Declaration itself were forced to add an annex to the document delineating unresolved differences on simul iustus et peccator, Luther’s idea that justified believers are at one and the same time sinful and righteous before God. How justification and sanctification are related in the life of the Christian still continues to be debated. On these and many other issues related to authority and ecclesiology, the way forward is not to smudge over deep differences that remain between the two traditions but to acknowledge them openly and to continue to struggle over them together in prayer and in fresh engagement with the Scriptures. The way forward is an ecumenism of conviction, not an ecumenism of accommodation.
Several years ago I was asked to endorse a book by my friend Mark Noll called Is the Reformation Over? I responded by saying that the Reformation is over only to the extent that it succeeded. In fact, in some measure, the Reformation has succeeded, and more within the Catholic Church than in certain sectors of the Protestant world. The triumph of grace in the theology of Luther was—and still is—in the service of the whole Body of Christ. Luther was not without his warts, and we can hardly imagine him canonized as a saint. (Remember: simul iustus et peccator!) But the question Karl Barth asked about him in 1933 is still worth pondering this Reformation Day: “What else was Luther than a teacher of the Christian church whom one can hardly celebrate in any other way but to listen to him?”
Timothy George is founding dean of Beeson Divinity School of Samford University, a member of the editorial board of First Things, and a theological advisor for Christianity Today. This article originally appeared in 2009.
Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.
Comments:
Some years ago I had the privilege of attending a Bible Study Fellowship seminar. It was a great and good thing to join together with three hundred and more women of Christian faith. The erudite and eloquent leader often spoke of the "Word" as the Bible text. Everyone did.
The Catholic liturgy of my childhood ended with "The Last Gospel" This was John 1: 1-14. This reading impressed itself upon my soul. "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God and the Word was God ... and the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us."
Jesus himself, in his person, is the Word of God. We know about him through the record in the Scriptures, in the apostolic teaching of the successors of the apostles. By the power of the Holy Spirit, we receive him in the Eucharist.
Thank you for taking the time to pen this fine piece.
"On these and many other issues related to authority and ecclesiology, the way forward is not to smudge over deep differences that remain between the two traditions but to acknowledge them openly and to continue to struggle over them together in prayer and in fresh engagement with the Scriptures. The way forward is an ecumenism of conviction, not an ecumenism of accommodation."
Amen! We must love, speak hard words in gentleness and respect, and love some more....
"On this Reformation Day, it is good to remember that Martin Luther belongs to the entire Church, not only to Lutherans and Protestants, just as Thomas Aquinas is a treasury of Christian wisdom for faithful believers of all denominations, not simply for Dominicans and Catholics."
Exactly! But not a RC saint? Why not? There have been other saints whose flaws have been quite obvious as well!
+Nathan Rinne
Thank you for your fine post. A big "amen" to the bit about the need for us to honestly deal with our differences and the point that Martin Luther belongs to the whole church.
+Nathan
Regarding the "Luther as saint" thing, I just started a series this morning called "The coming vindication of Martin Luther" - http://wp.me/psYq5-pR
+Nathan
To say, justifying Faith is not static, is to say justifying Faith requires Faith and Works, which Luther denied.
As valuable as it may be to seek deeper understanding of the manner in which we are justified & sanctified, it still seems that the far more fundamental issue remains that of authority. Even were every other issue to be resolved, as long as the question of authority remains unsettled, the wound of division in the Body of Christ will not be healed. Conversely however, once the question of authority is settled, every single other dispute is thereby put to rest by virtue of that same authority. After all, if we cannot agree on how the Word of God comes to us, then no satisfactory consensus on what the meaning of that Word is will be remotely feasible. But if mode in which God speaks to us is mutually recognized (and heeded), then the Word itself will adjudicate what human argumentation is quite impotent to settle. Hence, any dialogue that aims for a true solution to the scandal of division will focus on this one issue, upon which every other issue ultimately depends.
I wonder if Dennis has considered that, whenever Jesus spoke, what proceeded from His mouth was nothing other than the Word of God. Hence, the Word was oral before it was written (remembering of course that the fullness of that Word subsists in the very Person of Christ). How did the first believers become believers when there was as yet no (written) New Testament? Was it not by virtue of that Apostolic authority which Christ explicitly conveyed in saying, “Whoever listens to you, listens to me, and whoever rejects you, rejects me and the One who sent me”? Do Protestants really consider the implications of rejecting the inheritors of that same Apostolic authority, the Catholic Bishops? Are you taking Christ at His Word here? Why is it that Scripture itself, in naming the “pillar and foundation of truth,” identifies the Church? If the Church is the Mystical Body of He Who is “the Way, the Truth and the Life,” can the Church fail to share in the charism of Truth while possessing so great a Head? How do you know that the so-called Gospel of Judas is a fraud and that M, M, L & J are inspired, if not because the canon of Scripture was received from the Church? In short, why is sola scriptura so remarkably unscriptural?
Finally, if, as you suggest, Catholics can recognize truth in some of what Luther wrote, then it would seem there is no reason why Protestants cannot be reunited with the Church and continue to appreciate all that was valid in what he had to say. Indeed, if he never meant to separate, wouldn’t it be more true to his intention to reunite?
Respectfully in Christ,
Br. Timothy
Matthew 7:16
Scripture does condemns human tradition: “See to it that no one makes a prey of you by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition... and not according to Christ”, Colossians 2:8.
Scripture does NOT condemn traditions of apostolic teaching: “So then, brethren, stand firm and hold to THE TRADITIONS WHICH YOU WERE TAUGHT BY US, either by WORD OF MOUTH or by letter”, 2 Thessalonians 2:15. “I commend you because you remember me in everything and MAINTAIN THE TRADITIONS EVEN AS I DELIVERED THEM TO YOU”, 1 Corinthians 11:2; and “Now we command you, brethren, in the Name of the Lord Jesus Christ, that you keep away from brethren who is living in idleness and not in accord with THE TRADITIONS THAT YOU RECEIVED FROM US” 2 Thessalonians 3:6.
Scripture supports the authority of St. Peter and the other apostles: “I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven”, Matthew 16:19; 18:18.
Just because some modern evangelical translations remove the word “tradition” from these passages does not remove that word from the Greek manuscripts.
I too used to believe that Luther/Protestantism saved the Church. They did not! Luther’s rebellion divided the Body of Christ to his utter shame. Protestants, based on their individual papal authority, have continued to fragment the Body of Christ into tens-of-thousands of contradictory denominations in direct opposition to our Lord’s request in prayer: “I do not pray for these only (the apostles), but also for those who believe in me through their word (all the rest of us), THAT THEY (all the rest of us) MAY BE ONE; even as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they may also be in us, SO THAT THE WORLD MAY BELIEVE THAT THOU HAST SENT ME” John 17:20-21.
Because of Luther et al., the world sees division and hatred in direct contradiction to the teaching of Christ. There is nothing to celebrate about the Protestant revolt. Thank God for the one, true, holy, catholic and apostolic Church.
Some of the comments here point to the fact that reaffirming the work of the Holy Spirit in the Reformation of God’s church continues to be of primary importance.
For example, Br. Timothy’s admonition about the spoken words of Christ being “oral” before they were written shows a neo-Marcionism that is greatly to be avoided. What Christ did is to affirm the written Scriptures of the Old Testament down to the smallest “jot and tittle”. (Matt. 5:17-21) And the Old Testament is replete with instruction to “write it down” (Exodus 17:14, 34:1; Deuteronomy 17:18, 31:9; Isaiah 30:8; Jeremiah 30:2, etc.) And Jesus used the written Scriptures as an example of their primacy even to identify Himself after His resurrection(Luke 24:27); a situation where He could very easily have communicated orally. All of which is foundational to the Apostolic admonition to “Do not go beyond what is written”. (1 Corinthians 4:6)
And NewCatholico8 thinks this is all a matter of personal opinion. Here is where the recovery of the Doctrine of God by the Reformers performs its best service. For the question, in NC8’s schema still remains, what is the genesis of personal opinion? In the Roman Catholic world the answer is an autonomous choice by an autonomous agent. But, just as with Br. Timothy, we see here an ignorance of the Old Testament Scriptures which Jesus and His Apostles so vigorously affirmed. God speaking through the prophet Isaiah says, “I make known the end from the beginning, from ancient times, what is still to come…I will do all that I please” (Isaiah 46:10). The writer of Lamentations builds on that idea by writing, “Who can speak and have it happen, if the Lord has not decreed it?” (Lam 3:37) So the idea of God’s being sovereign over His creation was excavated by the Reformers. Man is a derivative being and not an autonomous agent. Even personal opinion falls under God’s sovereign decree. (See also, Philippians 2:13.)
So the idea of Sola Scriptura is not that God speaks and maybe man will hear. But rather, God speaks through His written Word, inspiring and opening the hearts of His chosen so that His word will not return empty. He is the beginning and the end of this process. Which is why the glory belongs solely to Him and we exclaim with the Reformers, Soli Deo Gloria!
Peace.
Here it is:
"I want to make a confession on your program here that I have never said before publicly. You know, I love Luther, and I love Calvin, and I probably would say even now, I am closer to Calvin than to Luther on most things. But, as I have gotten older and read more of both of them, I find myself drawn more and more back to Luther because I think Luther was the one great geniuses of the reformation. Calvin and others certainly built upon and extended and in some ways solidified his views. That is why if anything, you are right to say, “I tilt my head to Luther more than anybody else.” I think we probably have more to learn from him than anybody else."
I recently posted this and more here: http://wp.me/psYq5-ql
The precedence of oral tradition is hardly limited to the time following the Incarnation. Simply consider the people listed in the 1st part of Hebrews 11. Abel, Enoch, Noah, Abraham & Sarah – how is it that they exercised faith when there was as yet no Pentateuch? When Abraham believed, “and it was credited to him as righteousness,” was it a written word that he believed? Clearly not. Hebrews begins by noting that “in times past God SPOKE in many & varied ways through the prophets.” Notice it doesn’t say that God wrote to us through scribes (although He did do this as well). But what the sacred authors of Scripture wrote, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, was what the prophets had first transmitted orally. Do you suppose that Moses was not inspired when delivering his magnificent speeches before entering the promised land, but that these only became inspired when they were later recorded in Deuteronomy? The precise thing Deuteronomy tells us is that Moses spoke these very words we are now reading. So if you believe the Old Testament Scriptures at all, then you believe that the speeches recorded therein were given orally prior to their being recorded.
Apostolic Tradition refers more specifically to the teaching of Christ handed on by the Apostles and their Successors the Bishops, but the sequence of oral tradition preceding written tradition is seen just as clearly in God’s dealings with humanity before the Incarnation as it is after the Incarnation.
The Catholic Church embraces all of the Old and New Testament teaching plus the necessity of a teaching authority to interpret how Scripture applies to the new issues confronted by modern society (e.g., notice that the Catholic Church has always taught against the sin of abortion; Protestants ignored abortion for many years; many now support abortion; some have just begun to recognize the murderous sin of abortion for what it is).
My criticism of Protestantism can be no more clearly supported than by pointing to the thirty to forty thousand contradictory denomination, some of which do not accept the basic doctrines of the Trinity or the nature of Christ. Some hold to no doctrines. Protestantism’s unholy trinity of sola Scriptura, sola fide and perspicuity of Scripture have led to the creation of tens of thousands of existential, personal, private opinion based systems of belief. One needs only to read all of Luther’s material in depth to discover the arrogance and ungodliness of his driving motives. He brags that he came to many of his Scriptural understands while “sitting on the toilet”. I guess that makes his “throne” just as authoritative as the “chair of Peter”.



Without a final authority, there can be no cohesiveness of belief. Without a cohesiveness of belief, there can be no cohesiveness of Faith. That which separates us, is that which keeps us from being in communion.