Ads


Benedict XVI, the Great Augustinian


Not long ago, Pope Benedict XVI made a personal donation to the restoration of the Basilica of St. Augustine in Annaba, Algeria, the site of the ancient town of Hippo Regius, where the greatest theologian of the ancient church served as bishop from 395 to 430. It was here on September 26, 426, that Augustine met with his flock to name his successor as the bishop of Hippo, the presbyter Heraclitus.


Looking back over his long life of service in the church, Augustine ruminated, “How long old age may be prolonged is uncertain. . . . I came to this town—for such was the will of God—when I was in the prime of life. I was young then, but now I am old” (Ep. 213, 1). He wanted to spend the rest of his days, Augustine said, in prayer and the study of the Scriptures (Ep. 213, 6).


Popes are not allowed to choose their successor, though Benedict and his predecessor have chosen all the people who will choose his successor. However, one suspects that the precedent of Augustine’s retirement was not absent from the pope’s thinking as he considered how he could best fulfill his calling during his remaining days on earth.


Pope Benedict was once asked which two books he would take with him to read on a deserted island. His answer was the Bible and Augustine’s Confessions—precisely the two I would choose (though I would also like to sneak in Luther’s two catechisms and Calvin’s Institutes of the Christian Religion, and maybe a Baptist hymnal).


As he retires to his monastic retreat near St. Peter’s to devote himself to meditation, prayer, and reflection, the Holy Father—we can still call him that until February 28—will not be restricted to such a limited canon. With the Vatican library at his fingertips, its inventory increasingly online for the newly computer-savvy pope, Benedict will perhaps continue to serve the church by fulfilling his first calling as a theologian, a vocation he received prior to his summons to serve as bishop, cardinal, and pope.


Soon after Benedict emerged as the surprise choice of the most recent papal conclave in 2005, I wrote an essay on why Evangelical Protestants, among orthodox believers of all persuasions, should be pleased at his election. I summarized the promise of his new pontificate in five points. I emphasized that:


he takes truth seriously, an antidote to what he called on the eve of his papal election “the dictatorship of relativism”;

his theology is Bible-focused, building on the declaration of Vatican II that “easy access to sacred Scripture should be provided for all the Christian faithful”;

his message is Christocentric, boldly asserting that Jesus Christ is the divine Son of God and the only Redeemer of the world;

he is a fierce champion of the culture of life, advocating for the most vulnerable members of the human community, the children still waiting to be born.

To these four items I added a fifth: Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger is an Augustinian. Those familiar with his intellectual biography will find no surprise in this statement. As he himself noted, “I have developed my theology in a dialogue with Augustine.” His doctoral dissertation was on “The People and the House of God in Augustine’s Doctrine of the Church.” His Habilitationsschrift was on the great medieval Augustinian Bonaventure, whose theology he found more agreeable than that of Thomas Aquinas. His bent toward Augustine was early and deep, arising in part from his encounter with the thought of Martin Buber, whose personalism he found both winsome and in keeping with the gospel.


Benedict’s Augustinian orientation has led him to emphasize the triumph of grace in God’s salvific work in Jesus Christ. If St. Augustine is the doctor gratiae (doctor of grace) then Pope Benedict has been the papa gratiae par excellence. As Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Joseph Ratzinger played a key role in the historic Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification (1999), the most important ecumenical statement since Vatican II.


The Joint Declaration was a statement of differentiated consensus that left many important issues remaining to be resolved. However, for the first time since the sixteenth century, Catholics and Protestants were able to say together, “By grace alone, in faith in Christ’s saving work and not because of any merit on our part, we are accepted by God and received the Holy Spirit, who renews our hearts while equipping and calling us to good works.”


Other motifs from St. Augustine that have marked the pontificate of Benedict XVI are the priority of love (the theme of his first encyclical) and the coinherence of faith and reason. Protestants, especially those with Barthian proclivities, might want to ask whether the pope’s emphasis on reason has fully taken on board the reality of human sinfulness and the (other) Augustinian idea that concupiscence corrupts not only the body and the will but also the mind.


Theological anthropology is one of the loci on which confessional Protestants and traditional Catholics still have different emphases. But who can deny the pope’s understanding of reason as a good gift of God, something to be harnessed in the service of faith, and used to advance the common good including the stewardship of creation. The churches of the East have found a common platform with “green” Pope Benedict on this point.


St. Augustine is the granddaddy of us all. Pope Benedict has done the entire church a great service by inviting us to become a “traveling companion” with the most contemporary of the ancient Fathers. Benedict is the greatest theologian to become pope since the Reformation. The only other pope to come close in comparable depth and breadth is Leo XIII (1878–1903). When we become students in the school of Pope Benedict we sit at the feet of St. Augustine.


The New Evangelization to which he has called the church includes a strong focus on Christian unity, a renewed commitment to religious freedom, and the unshackled proclamation of God’s good news, news that the world is literally dying to hear afresh: that the almighty Creator of all that is has acted in space and time to reveal himself in nature and history and to redeem the world through the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. For his bold advocacy of this truth, Evangelical Christians, with all believers everywhere, must say Grazie Santità!


As Augustine lay dying in August 430, the Vandals had already reached the coasts of North Africa and were pillaging the city of Hippo. Augustine had the penitential Psalms printed in large letters, and he prayed them constantly as his eyes dimmed and his world fell apart. The world has grown old with age, he said.


This is something Augustine’s disciple, Pope Benedict, also knows. He affirmed this on Ash Wednesday by receiving the mark of the cross on his forehead, a sign of true humility and mortality—but also a confession of the deepest meaning of the paschal mystery: that if anyone is in Christ, there is a new creation (2 Cor. 5:17). In this Lenten moment, both Benedict and Augustine admonish the church, in the words of the great saint: “Do not refuse to be rejuvenated, united to Christ, even in the old world. He tells you: Do not fear, your youth will be renewed like that of the eagle” (Serm. 81, 8; Is. 40:30-31).


Timothy George is the founding dean of Beeson Divinity School of Samford University, a member of the First Things advisory council, and co-chair with Fr. Thomas Guarino of Evangelicals and Catholics Together.

Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.

Comments:

2.19.2013 | 7:36am
Amen, Dr. George, Amen. I have long admired Benedict XVI for reasons similar to your own and hope the Lord spares him long enough for research, writing, and publishing.
2.19.2013 | 10:55am
Wolf Paul says:
It is perhaps strange, but to me, the most striking part of this article is this short phrase:

"... the Holy Father—we can still call him that until February 28..."

As little as 20 years ago no Baptist or other evangelical Christian would be caught dead calling the Roman Catholic Bishop of Rome "Holy Father" ... or any clergyman "Father".

Of course we would not have found many prominent Roman Catholics either saying they aspired to be half as good a Christian as some Baptist theologian, as Robert George said in his Facebook post which sent me here.

Shows how far we have come ...
2.19.2013 | 12:49pm
Uri Brito says:
Where would I go ( a book) to get a good introduction to the theology of Benedict?
2.19.2013 | 3:13pm
Kieran says:
In answer to Uri Brito's question I think that his Introduction to Christianity is a good place to start.
2.19.2013 | 3:49pm
It is interesting that you mention his Habilitationsschrift on "The Theology of History in St. Bonaventure," as the key movement of that study was Bonaventure's rehabilitation of the more radical ecclesiologies/theologies of history put forward by a group of thinkers that Ratzinger (following Alois Dempf) termed "the German Symbolists". Their final and principal exponent, Joachim of Fiore, was the focus of the Seraphic Doctor's work that Ratzinger studied.

But an equally important member of that group of monastic theologians was our newest Doctor of the Church, St. Hildegard of Bingen. It is telling, I believe, that while Pope John Paul II refused at least twice to confirm her canonization and declare her a Doctor of the Church, it was the "German Shepherd" who chose to bestow those honors upon the "prophetissa teutonica", the "German prophetess." (I've written more extensively about the relationship between the two here: http://nathaniel-campbell.blogspot.com/2012/05/pope-and-prophetess-benedict-xvi.html )

I believe that fundamentally, Ratzinger's own ecclesiology owes a debt to those medieval thinkers and their dynamic understanding of the Body of Christ animated by the Holy Spirit. And that, of course, brings us right back to St. Augustine, for at its root, it is a thoroughly sacramental understanding, not merely in the sense of the Sacraments themselves but in the broader perception of the Church as a physical channel of grace and the People of God as the instruments of that grace.
2.19.2013 | 4:14pm
Don Roberto says:
Try "Introduction to Christianity" (2nd Ed.), Uri. A modern interpretation of the foundations of Christianity using the Apostle's Creed as its starting place.
2.19.2013 | 4:49pm
Nancy D. says:
Pope Benedict appears to be an Augustinian, which is why I find it strange that The Filioque was left out of The Creed in Dominus Iesus, and have often wondered if this was intentional, or was The Filioque simply lost in translation?
2.19.2013 | 6:13pm
D. B. Riker says:
Thanks, dean George, for this fine article! One thing that I did greatly respect in Benedict XVI was his commitment to truth: he had no interest for ecumenism based on "common grounds". On morals he, likewise, was no compromiser. Praise God for his example!
2.21.2013 | 11:19am
Such a beautiful, beautiful article! Thank you, Dr. George. I am also a great admirer of Pope Benedict and have read his books on JESUS OF NAZARETH as well as his encyclicals. History will show him to have been on of the greatest of the Popes. God be praised for His gift of Benedict to the world!
2.21.2013 | 4:00pm
Heidi says:
Uri, if you're looking for a book about Benedict's theology rather than a book written by him, Tracey Rowland's "Ratzinger's Faith" is excellent in content, well written and more accessible than the classic account by Aidain Nichols. Among Benedict's own output I would highly recommend the several collections of his Cathechesis on important persons in Church history, beginning with the New testament. Ignatius press have nice versions.
2.26.2013 | 10:36am
@Wolf Paul - I admire Pope Benedict but I'm not comfortable referring to him as "Holy Father." It seems to be a title that should be reserved for God. So, I'd go with Brother Benedict.
2.26.2013 | 11:40am
Thank you, Dr. George, for praising Christian leadership, and servant-hood, that "takes truth seriously"; is "...Bible-focused", "...Christo-centric" and "...a fierce champion of the culture of life".

Your description notably paints a sharp contrast to the "of-the-world leadership" wearing the microphone in many American pulpits.

Sad, but strikingly obvious; it's time to read, sign, and live the Manhattan Declaration.

P.S. Thank you, Dr. George, for your service, and leadership, with The Manhattan Declaration.
2.26.2013 | 1:20pm
Dr. George, This was a wonderful article and tribute. You are certainly a member of the catholic (small "c") Church. As St. Augustine wrote, apt for the world today, "Dicebant veritas et veritas, et veritas non erat in eis".
2.26.2013 | 2:41pm
Dan C says:
George (not the author), I could not help but relate your comments to those who today say "Jesus was a good man, but ..."
Read your Bible a bit closer, Saint Paul refers to himself as his follower's "Father". (1st Cor.) Please don't waste your time replying about not calling any man "Father", I already know and understand that faulty teaching.
Use of the title "Father" and the "Holy Father" go back to the beginning when Jesus founded his Church and declared that the gates of hell would not prevail against it. Study the Early Church Fathers writings, like Ignatius of Antioch. He was a direct student of at least 2 of the Apostles. He should know what they taught better than anyone today.
2.26.2013 | 3:26pm
Barry Bishop says:
I'm all about giving credit where credit is due but wish Baptist theologians like George would not commend the Pope. To me it shows a growing ecumenism not based on the Bible. I have people in my (Baptist) church that are considering "swimming the Tiber" because they have a Catholic upbringing and no longer see the divide between Protestant and Catholic theology thanks in part to squishy attitudes like these between theological differences. How is the Pope not an antichrist? He is called the Vicar of Christ--he puts himself in the place of Christ. He is viewed as a mediator between God and man when Scripture makes it clear that there is "only one mediator between men and God, the man Christ Jesus." Scripture plus Holy Tradition = another Gospel (and no Gospel.) We take the cults to task when they have a leader who invests all authority in himself, why don't we do this with world religions as well, like Roman Catholicism? 1John 2:18 "Children, it is the last hour, and as you have heard that antichrist is coming, so now many antichrists have come. Therefore we know that it is the last hour."
2.26.2013 | 4:40pm
James says:
As a Catholic admirer of Pope Benedict XVI's theology brillance and St. Augustine's magnificient writings and philosophy, I could not help but marvel at the fact that a Southern Baptist Evangelical Theologian wrote so eloquently about Pope Benedict. Thank you Dr. George.
2.26.2013 | 4:53pm
After reading this narrative, I have but one word, "Outstanding!"

Chaplain Robert Mercado, M.A., M.Div.
United States Navy
2.26.2013 | 5:39pm
Barbara says:
Thank you for this wonderful article. After all...we are all one body.
2.26.2013 | 6:48pm
I agree, in essence with Barry Bishop. Credit where credit is due, but there is still much of real and salvific substance to protest and this article gushes a little too much. The Protestant Reformation was not an old musty bit of misunderstanding. If the Catholic Church doesn't need the scriptures to defend such a large part of its theology and practices (I would say Scripture and/or Holy Tradition and/or The Pope Said So = Another Gospel) we don't yet have enough common ground. Debating Papal Authority, the necromancy of actually asking favors of dead saints, and their fanciful Marian mythologies with the Catholic Church (and these things should not be left unchallenged) is fruitless if one of the arguing sides does not need the Scriptures. Those who "swim the Tiber" have something other than sound theology ferrying them across, and articles like this do not help the discussion.
2.26.2013 | 7:13pm
I congratulate Dr. George on his article and being a Catholic, I can say that our Holy Father is everything that has been stated there. From the beginning he had no desire to take up the mantle of Papal responsibility. He would have preferred to have continued teaching and studying the Bible and praying as he has already indicated he will return to, cum February 28th. But when he was called, he answered "Here I am Lord, I come to do yor will". Now he feels that he is physically and mentally unable to do justice to the calling, in all humility he has put the Church first and is handing over the responsibilities to someone who could carry them out. The decision took courage, and all Catholics should be prepared to accept his rationale and pray for the successor. God bless Benedict!
2.26.2013 | 9:46pm
Barry,
If I may, you are at risk of staining at the gnat while swallowing an entire bee-hive. Of course the Pope is the "Vicar of Christ", as are we all, the title is only capitalized because of his office. More important by far is how the Popes style themselves,"Servus servi Christi", the Servant of the Servants of Christ. It is further odd in the extreme that you seem to maintain the fallacious idea of "Sola Scriptura". Without the "Holy Tradition" you mention, there would have been no New Testament, the Council at Nicaea defined Christianity for all time without benefit of the New Testament as we have it. The Canon was formed by circulating a list of possible candidates for inclusion and accepting those that best matched the "Holy Tradition" of the Church. Perhaps a course in Church history would temper you vitriol and lead you to a better understanding of the efforts of the last three Popes.
2.26.2013 | 11:24pm
Greg Bussey says:
Barry & Shawne, God bless your great zeal! Clearly the Catholic church must be promoting "Another Gospel." Just wondering, though, with at least 8,196 different Protestant denominations, don't at least 8,195 of them have to be promoting "Another Gospel" too?
2.27.2013 | 9:29am
Helga Bracke says:
Pope Benedict served the Catholic with great love and humility. He knows, that to lead the Holy Catholic Church requires someone with energy and stamina. At 86 years of age, these attributes are no longer there. Most people retire by the age of 65 to 70 years. Pope Benedict served the church well in all he did, wrote, preached and led. I will continue to pray for him and for his coming soon successor that we will have another great pope.
Thank you Dr. George for your wonderful article on our Holy Father.
We continue to pray that some day we may all be one. That was Jesus's prayer.
May continue to bless you.
Helga Bracke
2.27.2013 | 7:46pm
Greg, thank you for the blessings, truly. Paul anticipated that other gospels could be preached; there can, potentially, be as many other gospels as there are churches, denominations, or preachers (Catholic or otherwise, the bent toward rebellion is still a part of this world and not even the Catholic church is immune). However, there is one true Gospel that can be preached by just as many and is preached by those faithful to the scriptures. The number of denominations is an opportunity to preach that one true Gospel far and wide. With opportunity comes the risk that some will go off the tracks, something Paul also dealt with in his epistles. The fact that some preach one of the others, does nothing to sully the one true, nor the ability for all to potentially preach the one true. My point is that if you no longer need the scriptures to appeal to in order to define the Gospel, you can make rank additions (the Book of Mormon) or rearrange and leave out what you like (The Roman Catholic Womenpriests). Catholic or Protestant, we must all appeal to the scriptures for matters of faith and practice. Don't deliberately miss my point because you think the sheer number of denominations is a bad thing and in itself a vindication of Catholic teachings. Blessings.
2.28.2013 | 3:16pm
Michael Ward says:
God bless my Protestant brothers and sisters. Somehow, they seem to think that before Jesus ascended from the earth, Jesus handed them the New Testament Bible told them to preach only from this book. Please remember that it was the Catholic Church that decided what writings would be in the Bible. This was done under the authority that Christ had given to His Church on earth. If Christ didn't give this authority to his Church on earth, why did he ask Saint Paul "why are you persecuting Me?" Saint Paul did not write anything until Christ fully instructed him, just as Christ instructed His disciples. Christ didn't send out the 70 with a New Testament Bible. To paraphrase, the Bible teaches us that if everything that Christ taught was written, there wouldn't be enough material in the world upon which to write it all down. If the Catholic Church teaches error, then the Bible is in error since the Catholic Church decided which books should be written down. They also have the authority to interpret it for the faithful. It just doesn't make sense that Jesus would allow His church to teach error on faith and morals for 1500 years until Martin Luther decided he knew better than Justin, Augustine and many other Church "fathers" including Benedict the XVI.
2.28.2013 | 3:24pm
Barry Bishop says:
Lee Roy Miles,
thank you for bringing up two tired arguments from Roman Catholics about canon and church History. I do not deny all tradition. Obviously, when the word "Trinity" is used it is a traditional term that defines something clearly taught in Scripture. It also summarizes a debate that lasted centuries in church history as Christians struggled to accurately describe the nature of God and of Jesus and the Holy Spirit and clarify who were the heretics (according to Scripture). However, I fail to see what this has to do with the later RCC traditions such as the Assumption of Mary or adding the Apocrypha during the counter-Reformation. Are you telling me that because the canon was recognized officially by early councils of what was then the catholic church (not the Roman Catholic church) that later Popes and Councils are then able to authoritatively contradict Scripture? In other words they (catholic) gave the canon so that they (later RCC Popes and Councils) are also able to change, add to or contradict Scripture? Has the RCC replaced the Holy Spirit on earth? This would be implied if you say that they "gave" the canon rather than "recognized" the canon of Scripture. Has the Pope replaced the authority of Jesus on earth with his own authority? This is implied by the RCC by the Pope speaking infallibly ex cathedra. Additional divine revelation through one man today other than Jesus contradicts Heb. 1:2. It again places the Pope in the place of Jesus and this would be the definition of an antichrist.
2.28.2013 | 9:42pm
God Be Praised, in Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Holy Trinity, and in the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. Many thanks also to you, Mr. George, for this wonderful synopsis of your inspiration (Divine, methinks, but not to say that you are preaching a new Gospel and no longer in need of Sacred Scripture, of course) to present Pope Benedict XVI as a a true Servant of God. Mr. Bishop (if you've read this far, would you please give specific examples of how any ACTUAL teaching of doctrine or dogma of the Roman Catholic Church either contradicts or presumes to trump or supersede the teachings, doctrine, or dogmas of Our Lord Jesus Christ in Sacred Scriptures? How would the belief that Mary, the mother of Jesus Christ, was assumed body and soul into Heaven contradict or conflict in any way with Christian Doctrine that is 'solely' Scripture-based? And do you not know that Sacred Tradition is how the new Testament was derived? ( more credibly stated by previous commentors)
I pray that you surrender to the Holy Spirit your appetite for mis-guided, mal-formed, and mis-understood 'knowledge' of the Catholic Church and the Catholic Faith. The the bitterness of vitriol will be replaced by the sweetness of Truth. God Bless you, my Brother in Christ.
3.2.2013 | 3:56pm
Barry Bishop,

The Pope is called the Vicar of Christ because he is the successor of Peter (and, yes, Apostolic succession is completely Scriptural), to whom Christ gave the keys of the Kingdom, saying to him and his Apostles (the Magisterium of the Chuch) "whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in Heaven, whatever you loose on Earth shall be loosed in Heaven," and, most notably, "he who hears you hears me; he who rejects you rejects me." From Jesus' own lips, we hear Peter (in communion with the Apostles) being made Christ's vicar on Earth.
3.2.2013 | 11:36pm
Barry Bishop says:
Mary's perpetual virginity is one of many examples of the Roman Catholic tradition contradicting scripture.
See http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/resources/mary/main-marian-documents-of-the-church/perpetual-virginity-catechism-of-the-catholic-church/

And compare to Matt 1:24-25, 13:55-56, John 2:12

You might think that Mary's perpetual virginity is a minor issue however there's also the issue of relics, praying to the saints, Purgatory, Limbo, indulgences, 7 sacraments rather than the 2 specifically commanded by Jesus in Scripture, etc, etc. Mary as mediatrix and co-redemptrix (contra 1Tim 2:5)

The divide is wide which is why I commented initially to chide Dr. George (a Baptist) for gushing over the pope emeritus.
3.3.2013 | 11:23am
Brian says:
Dr. George, your words of admiration for the (now former) Holy Father are touching. The comments here by Barry Bishop and Shawne Randlett only serve to show that you have a long way to go to dispel ignorant notions about the Holy Catholic Church which obviously still exist in your ecclesial communities. It's a shame when real theologians are scolded for their charitable words by armchair theologians who have no clue as to what they are criticizing.

May Jesus Christ be praised now and forever.
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact