Apparently our political candidates are not being careful with their personal pronouns. This should not be too surprising, as they have other things to occupy the forefront of their minds, but the Wall Street Journal has a nice article on grammar in politics and the changing trends in American English. The best quote comes from Bryan Garner, former editor of Oxford’s Dictionary of Modern American Usage : “People who are shaky in their grammar think of ‘myself’ as a safe usage, but to a real snoot, it’s bothersome.”
When it comes to matters linguistic, myself is definitely a real snoot. But myself am also a linguistics major who remembers a bit of English syntax. I like my sentences to obey the rules of English grammar, under which reflexive pronouns (like myself ) require proper antecedents and cannot be the subject of sentences. While I won’t be voting on grammar this November, I do hope that the candidates can clean up their English, if not for the sake of the English language then for that of the voters ourselves.
While I have you, can I ask you something? I’ll be quick.
Twenty-five thousand people subscribe to First Things. Why can’t that be fifty thousand? Three million people read First Things online like you are right now. Why can’t that be four million?
Let’s stop saying “can’t.” Because it can. And your year-end gift of just $50, $100, or even $250 or more will make it possible.
How much would you give to introduce just one new person to First Things? What about ten people, or even a hundred? That’s the power of your charitable support.
Make your year-end gift now using this secure link or the button below.
