On the Intercollegiate Studies Institute ‘s website, you can find an excerpt from David Novak’s latest book, In Defense of Religious Liberty . A sample to whet your appetite:
How one justifies a public stance that is consistent with one’s theology without invoking that theology as its public authorization is a philosophical question. It requires a philosophical answer. Unfortunately, though, when it comes to raising this question, much less answering it cogently, religious communities have not been too articulate, let alone persuasive. And I suspect that their political ineptitude is largely because of their lack of philosophical clarity on this and other public claims of religious liberty they make in public. So let me be so bold as to try to help religious communities make at least a more plausible, if not more compelling, philosophical case for their public moral claims. I do this, of course, with a vested interest in the matter, myself being an active member of one such religious communitya community that could and should be more vociferous in its advocacy of certain public norms, norms that are not simply for the sake of its own particular political interests.
While I have you, can I ask you something? I’ll be quick.
Twenty-five thousand people subscribe to First Things. Why can’t that be fifty thousand? Three million people read First Things online like you are right now. Why can’t that be four million?
Let’s stop saying “can’t.” Because it can. And your year-end gift of just $50, $100, or even $250 or more will make it possible.
How much would you give to introduce just one new person to First Things? What about ten people, or even a hundred? That’s the power of your charitable support.
Make your year-end gift now using this secure link or the button below.