Over on Postmodern Conservative, Helen Rittelmeyer provides a reply to my criticisms of her proposal for a bioethics of love. In her original essay I was in agreement (mostly) with her basic premiselove should be the foundational principle of bioethicsbut disagreed with her conclusion. In her latest post, I disagree (mostly) with her new premiseSometimes we get closer to God by striving for perfection; sometimes we do it by turning our imperfections up to eleven: fasting, asceticism, bodily mortifications, drunkenness, etc.”but agree with the conclusion (see her last paragraph).
There are some writers that are enjoyable to read because you agree with them and they help you understand what you already believe; others because you disagree with them and they help you understand another point of view. Helen almost always does bothoften in the same articleand yet does so in a way that you would never expect. (Drunkenness as a helpful metaphor for the kingdom of heaven? Never saw that one coming.) She is a truly original thinker whose writing is always worth your time. Be sure to check out her post and encourage her to contribute more often at PomoCon.
We launched the First Things 2023 Year-End Campaign to keep articles like the one you just read free of charge to everyone.
Measured in dollars and cents, this doesn't make sense. But consider who is able to read First Things: pastors and priests, college students and professors, young professionals and families. Last year, we had more than three million unique readers on firstthings.com.
Informing and inspiring these people is why First Things doesn't only think in terms of dollars and cents. And it's why we urgently need your year-end support.
Will you give today?