Exhibit A is this insightful bit of prose written in response to the plot of James Cameron’s Avatar :
The question is whether Nature actually deserves a religious response. Traditional theism has to wrestle with the problem of evil: if God is good, why does he allow suffering and death? But Nature is suffering and death. Its harmonies require violence. Its circle of life is really a cycle of mortality. And the human societies that hew closest to the natural order arent the shining Edens of James Camerons fond imaginings. Theyre places where existence tends to be nasty, brutish and short.
Religion exists, in part, precisely because humans arent at home amid these cruel rhythms. We stand half inside the natural world and half outside it. Were beasts with self-consciousness, predators with ethics, mortal creatures who yearn for immortality.
This is an agonized position, and if theres no escape upward or no God to take on flesh and come among us, as the Christmas story has it a deeply tragic one.
Pantheism offers a different sort of solution: a downward exit, an abandonment of our tragic self-consciousness, a re-merger with the natural world our ancestors half-escaped millennia ago.
But except as dust and ashes, Nature cannot take us back.
When, when, besides this, are the readers of the New York Times going to get a more true characterization of the Christian hope for mankind?
You can read the full column here .
We launched the First Things 2023 Year-End Campaign to keep articles like the one you just read free of charge to everyone.
Measured in dollars and cents, this doesn't make sense. But consider who is able to read First Things: pastors and priests, college students and professors, young professionals and families. Last year, we had more than three million unique readers on firstthings.com.
Informing and inspiring these people is why First Things doesn't only think in terms of dollars and cents. And it's why we urgently need your year-end support.
Will you give today?