The functions of the family and church, says Douglas Farrow, are being replaced by the state :
When I speak of the audacity of the state, the kind of state I have in mind is what we may call the savior state. The main characteristic of the savior state is that it presents itself as the peoples guardian, as the guarantor of the citizens well-being. The savior state is the paternal state, which not only sees to the security of its territory and the enforcement of its laws but also promises to feed, clothe, house, educate, monitor, medicate, and in general to care for its people. Some prefer to call it the nanny state, but that label fails to reckon with its inherently religious character. The savior state does have a religious character, precisely in its paternalism, and may even be comfortable with religious rhetoric.
We are familiar with such rhetoric from ancient times. Was Caesar not soter? Did his coinage not mark him out as divi filius and pontifex maximus? This, this is he, says Anchises in Virgils Aeneid, the one youve been waiting forthe man you have heard promised to you so often, Augustus Caesar, son of a god, who will once again establish the Golden Age in Latium, in the region once ruled by Saturn.
We are familiar with it from modern times too. The savior state is the kind of state that Hobbes envisioned, or that Louis Du Moulin had in mind when he said that the Commonwealth is a visible church. It is the kind of state that emerges when it is assumed, as Herbert Thorndike pointed out in objection to both Hobbism and Independency, that a man may be heir to Christs kingdom and endowed with Christs Spirit without being, or before he be, a member of Gods church. It is the kind of state that Obama had in mind when, during the presidential campaign, he invited a Christian audience in South Carolina to see him as an instrument of God and to help him create a Kingdom right here on Earth.
Read more . . .
(Via: Acton Institute Power Blog )