An interesting post from Felix Salmon, in which he writes :
an entire generation of Americans started working and saving and buying a house in the early 1970s—and millions of them hit the trifecta, becoming successful in their careers even as their stocks rose and the value of their real-estate soared. I doubt that particular combination is going to happen again in the U.S., but the experience of that generation is so powerful as to give a lot of people a lot of hope. Even if that hope isn’t particularly rational.
Megan McArdle considers it and concludes, “If you’re saving a little bit in the expectation that your 401(k) will boom, your house will appreciate, and Social Security will support you, you may well end up in big trouble.”
Which may well be true, but it ignores the eventual factor of inheritance from that privileged generation, even if their property is diminished in value. But that, then, locks in wealth to certain classes.
We’ve seen this before in American history—with, for instance, the perpetuated upper and middle classes of Massachusetts in the nineteenth century. The privileged little boys and girls who, with just enough money not to have to work, worked so hard at abolition, and literature, and Unitarianism.
What will this new generation do, so far from the puritans who were still at the root of the old Adams and Lowells and Alcotts?
While I have you, can I ask you something? I’ll be quick.
Twenty-five thousand people subscribe to First Things. Why can’t that be fifty thousand? Three million people read First Things online like you are right now. Why can’t that be four million?
Let’s stop saying “can’t.” Because it can. And your year-end gift of just $50, $100, or even $250 or more will make it possible.
How much would you give to introduce just one new person to First Things? What about ten people, or even a hundred? That’s the power of your charitable support.
Make your year-end gift now using this secure link or the button below.
