Support First Things by turning your adblocker off or by making a  donation. Thanks!

“The plot is a mishmash of disparate narratives; the expository opening scene, when soldiers on the night watch recount the tensions between Denmark and Norway, is deadening; and Shakespeare’s need to get Hamlet back to Denmark after his exile to England forces the playwright to resort to the preposterous expedient of having Hamlet’s ship be boarded by a subspecies of men previously unknown to history,  well-intentioned pirates , who helpfully spirit the prince back to Elsinore without even demanding a ransom,” notes Fr. Edward Oakes in today’s “On the Square” article, The Suffering, Abominable Hamlet .

That, he continues, is not the real problem T. S. Eliot complained about that about ninety years ago:

It has never been clear to the audience, he claimed, exactly  why Hamlet did not seek revenge for his father’s murder after promising his father’s ghost that he would do so. Indeed, no sooner has the ghost of his father returned to his place of punishment than Hamlet tells Horatio that he plans to “put an antic disposition on.” Why?

Fr. Oakes has an answer.

Dear Reader,

Your charitable support for First Things is urgently needed before July 1.

First Things is a proudly reader-supported enterprise. The gifts of readers like you— often of $50, $100, or $250—make articles like the one you just read possible.

This Spring Campaign—one of our two annual reader giving drives—comes at a pivotal season for America and the church. With your support, many more people will turn to First Things for thoughtful religious perspectives on pressing issues of politics, culture, and public life.

All thanks to you. Will you answer the call?

Make My Gift



Filter First Thoughts Posts

Related Articles