Support First Things by turning your adblocker off or by making a  donation. Thanks!

Ryan Lizza’s profile of Bachmann is designed to produce guffaws from the New Yorker’s readership, but I was impressed by the discipline and focus of Bachmann’s campaign.  They know that the public cares more about the economy and government spending than which Founder fought how hard against slavery, and that most of the people who wanted to continue the argument didn’t wish her well.  Bachmann also showed class by refusing to engage with Tina Brown’s attempt to turn Newsweek into the Keith Olbermann of glossy newsweeklies.  She isn’t running to sell books or earn valuable victim points.  She is running to win votes for the office of President of the United States.

I don’t think she should be President (she is at best my fourth choice among Republicans either running or looking likely to run), but critics like Lizza are doing more to scarify upper middle-class liberals than undermine or even explain Bachmann’s appeal.  That means spending less time on what she did or didn’t do at Oral Roberts University and more time looking at the combination of rhetorical vagueness and rhetorical radicalism that characterizes some of her comments on economic issues.

00 Days
00 Hours
00 Minutes
00 Seconds
Dear Reader,

Your charitable support for First Things is urgently needed before the clock above hits zero.

First Things is proud to be a reader-supported enterprise, and the Spring Campaign is one of only two major reader giving drives each year. It ends on June 30 at 11:59 p.m.

Your gift will fortify First Things to speak boldly on behalf of religious voices in the public square ahead of a pivotal season for our nation and the church.

Please give now.

Make My Gift
More on: Politics

Comments are visible to subscribers only. Log in or subscribe to join the conversation.



Filter First Thoughts Posts

Related Articles