A First Thoughts post on Tuesday highlighting resentment of Baby Boomers by directionless Millennials generated some strong criticisms of todays youth and their propensity to blame their elders for our current economic and moral breakdown. But lest anyone conclude its only whining, hapless 20-somethings condemning their elders, consider the rhetoric in Catholic screenwriter Barbara Nicolosis piece on the need for Boomer repentance, published last year at Patheos and recently re-published with commentary by John-Henry Westen at LifeSiteNews.
Among many strongly polemical observations, Nicolosi suggests that Christian churches ought to exert pressure on our aging citizens and call them to account for the way they self-righteously sacrificed all others in pursuit of material comfort. But perhaps her most explosive point comes when she argues that Baby Boomers must now reckon with the consequences of their own philosophy on bioethical issues. Having placed expediency, choice, and personal comfort at the center of the abortion debate, Nicolosi wonders how this generation can credibly protest should todays youth consider euthanizing vast swaths of their generation. After all, she notes:
the Entitled Generation will quickly morph into the Expensive Generation as they and Millennials are bent low under the weight of social programs that were strapped on their backs without their consent. [ . . . ] History is devastatingly cyclical. The Boomers made the case that they should end their marriages and abort their children for the God Expediency. Their children, stripped of any attachment to a moral framework, will eye the old grey hairs, drooling and in diapersbut certainly still sneeringand consider expedient Death with Dignity to be a sensible and pragmatic policy.
Its not clear if Nicolosi is being facetious, quasi-facetious, or wholly serious, but this kind of panegyriceven if intended as a thought experimentseems to undermine her earlier message of forgiveness and repentance. While the gap in Boomer logic she points out is very real, its doubtful that this kind of hypothetical will result in anything but entrenching existing positions and heightening distrust. Nevertheless, the strength of the sentiments expressed in this article expose the expanding generation war and hint at the enormity of the nastiness on both sides of the age gap.
But does Nicolosi have a case that religious institutions might, through the curious, perhaps-novel act of summoning the elderly away from their wrongdoing, be able to mediate this divide?
We launched the First Things 2023 Year-End Campaign to keep articles like the one you just read free of charge to everyone.
Measured in dollars and cents, this doesn't make sense. But consider who is able to read First Things: pastors and priests, college students and professors, young professionals and families. Last year, we had more than three million unique readers on firstthings.com.
Informing and inspiring these people is why First Things doesn't only think in terms of dollars and cents. And it's why we urgently need your year-end support.
Will you give today?