Support First Things by turning your adblocker off or by making a  donation. Thanks!

Writing for the Atlantic , Alan Jacobs reports some insightful lessons from a study session led by Rabbi Jacob Schachter aimed at formulating a sound religious posture toward the internet. Jacobs was thrown off at first when Rabbi Schacter introduced the session by handing out a three-ring binder filled with photocopies of rabbinic legal sources regarding the proper execution of a get (a ’ get ’ is a traditional Jewish document of divorce)—a matter with no apparent relevance to the session’s supposed topic.

Jacobs recounts his initial reaction , and then eventual understanding:


This seemed a strange way to proceed, but I soon saw the sense of it, because traditionally a  get  had to be written by a  sofer  (scribe) according to a very strict protocol—and with the rise of the printing press in the sixteenth century, debates ensued among rabbis about whether a printed  get  could ever be legitimate.

Rabbi Schacter went on to explain the complex theological questions posed to traditional practice by the advent of the printing press:


Why was there no printing press in the time of the Patriarchs, or of the sages of the  Mishnah ? Were these not great and wise men—men who talked with God!—who could have invented the printing press had they thought it appropriate to do so, or had God so instructed them? And was not their failure to do so an indication that the printing press is to be shunned? Some thought so, but others replied, no, not at all: The fact that these men were great sages who knew God did not mean that they could overleap the state of their own age. Technology develops incrementally in any given culture, and even the wisest men of God have no power to escape those conditions.

Schacter’s message was that contemporary Jewish leader’s coming to terms with today’s technology will require that they, in Jacobs’ words, “think as seriously and as faithfully as their ancestors did about the printing press.” The take-away for Jacobs: “By entering into the conversation with those we admire from the past, we can practice the habits of mind we need in order to be discerning users of technology today.” A valuable lesson indeed.

Dear Reader,

While I have you, can I ask you something? I’ll be quick.

Twenty-five thousand people subscribe to First Things. Why can’t that be fifty thousand? Three million people read First Things online like you are right now. Why can’t that be four million?

Let’s stop saying “can’t.” Because it can. And your year-end gift of just $50, $100, or even $250 or more will make it possible.

How much would you give to introduce just one new person to First Things? What about ten people, or even a hundred? That’s the power of your charitable support.

Make your year-end gift now using this secure link or the button below.
GIVE NOW

Comments are visible to subscribers only. Log in or subscribe to join the conversation.

Tags

Loading...

Filter First Thoughts Posts

Related Articles