In his memoir Hidden: Reflections on Gay Life, AIDS, and Spiritual Desire , Richard Giannone, emeritus professor at Fordham, writes about his mothers slow decline and his care for her in her final days. Central to the story is Giannones long-time partner Frank. After Giannones mothers death, as Giannone begins immediately to care for his aging sister, he becomes more keenly aware of all the ways his life is intertwined with his partners. For instance:
When Frank and I returned early evening that Saturday to our apartment in the Village, I was still shaken. By 2003 Frank had been with me for twenty-two years. Our partnership was repeatedly tested in the fire of social defiance and in the emergency room with family members and each other. Characteristically, Frank spoke not a word. He put down the bags with clean laundry, pulled me against him, and held me tight. Franks grip was so firm that his Parkinsons got his arms wedged hugging me. We were caught, locked, immovable. We laughed. The sinews of our attached muscles held the love that bound us through the tight spot with Marie [Giannones sister].
I was home. I was in my faithful friend and partners shelter.
I chose this excerpt almost at random. Virtually every chapter is filled with similarly tender moments of quiet intimacy.
Its these kind of glimpses into gay life (among other things) that make it hard for many Christians today to imagine that there could be anything wrong with being gay. You cant read a memoir like Giannones and easily draw evidence that having a long-time sexual partner of the same sex diminishes ones life. On the contrary, Giannones partnership with Frank was precisely what enabled him to care for his dying mother and sister, and what sustained him when they were lost.
And this is the reason comparisons of homosexuality to other sinful behaviors often ring so false. Homosexuality is like racism ? If thats the case, then why are the fruitshatred and alienation in the latter case, humanizing care and love in the formerso obviously different?
The traditional Christian proscription of same-sex sexual partnerships does not require us to draw such specious comparisons or to say that there is nothing good at all in gay partnerships. On the contrary, even Karl Barth, who uncompromisingly rejects homosexual partnerships as out of step with the Creators intention, writes that such unions are often redolent of sanctity ( Church Dogmatics III/4, p. 166) because they are about the struggle to give and receive love. In his essay for First Things yesterday, Aaron Taylor made this point very effectively .
I also think here of the passage from C. S. Lewis Surprised by Joy in which he reflects on the homosexuality he witnessed at his boarding school in his adolescence.
People commonly talk as if every other evil were more tolerable than this. But why? . . . If those of us who have known a school like Wyvern dared to speak the truth, we should have to say that [homosexuality] was, in that time and place, the only foothold or cranny left for certain good things. It was the only counterpoise to the social struggle; the one oasis . . . in the burning desert of competitive ambition. In his unnatural love-affairs, and perhaps only there, the Blood went a little out of himself, forgot for a few hours that he was One of the Most Important People There Are. It softens the picture.
According to Lewis, a misdirected expression of eros may still be seen as a seeking after truth, goodness, and beauty. And Christian faith can and must acknowledge that, even as it seeks to point eros to its real fulfillment in Christ.
(Cross-posted at Spiritual Friendship )